Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Google's interest in Twitter is all about the consciousness search

Why would Google want to buy Twitter? They have yet to properly monetize Youtube, another company they've recently purchased for what some think was way over value.

Sure, Google has lots and lots of money to spend. But there isn't much to Twitter that Google couldn't recreate itself with its vast internal resources. So why spend a billion dollars on something so (relatively) simple?

For one, Twitter is already running at full speed. Google can't recreate the buzz and the excitement in the rapidly growing Twitter community.

I got a Twitter account over a year ago. Initially it was pretty boring in there. Only a few people of any interest were posting material and there was no really good way to follow it.

In July, Twitter made the move of the century by acquiring the Twitter search engine called Summize. (If Google were really smart, they would have bought Summize last year.) Summize is the engine that searches Twitter and perhaps just as importantly, pulls trends from all of the millions of Twits. In a blog post at the time, Twitterers said:

Summize is a popular service for searching Twitter and keeping up with emerging trends in real-time. Like Twitter, Summize offers an API so other products and services can filter the constant queue of updates in a variety of ways. The Summize service and API will be merged with our own and integrated under the Twitter brand.

There is an undeniable need to search, filter, and otherwise interact with the volumes of news and information being transmitted to Twitter every second. We will be adding search and its related features to the core offering of Twitter in the very near future. In the meantime, everyone is welcome to access search.twitter.com—there’s no need for a Twitter account.

They were right. Over the past year, Twitter has become a totally different tool. While I get a kick out of seeing what my friends are doing and like to update them with neat things that I observe, the real value for me in Twitter is the real-time search and trending.

Yesterday's North Korean missile launch is a great example. Before any of the news sites could put anything up (I think most of the original info was provided by a BBC report), Twitter's trends reported "North Korea launches Missle." When I switched over to Google news, nothing was there yet on the missile launch. I had to find the story through the Tweets.

If I am looking for information about a hot technology topic, Twitter is the best place to find up-to-the-second information. Technorati and Google Blog search are just a little too slow.

This is why Google wants Twitter. Twitter has enticed people to share news, events, and nothing short of their consciousness with the rest of the world. At the same time it is able to harvest that information into a valuable product to consumers. Google can't make this. They must buy it (either wholesale or as a service).

What People Are Saying

How Google and Yahoo view Twitter

There was a shown down between twitter, Google and Yahoo at last week's SF Jelly talks. Google and Yahoo each place Twitter in different contexts--Google views twitter as valuable source of URL's to add to its algorithm. Yahoo see's twitter as a way of adding fresh content to breaking news sites.

But really twitter can be worth so much more. It can be our source of mobilizing learning and resources much faster than ever before.

To read more on all this please visit: http://bit.ly/cmbG3

20 reasons why Twitter will fail

I have written an article about why I think Twitter will fail.

http://www.flexewebs.com/semantix/levels/visionary/20-reasons-why-twitter-will-fail/

I am not sure that Google will buy Twitter, but it could well happen.

If it does happen, Google will change Twitter quite a lot more than likely in order to integrate it into its own app suite.

Twitter will replace newspapers

Not only is it consciousness search, it's also a way to explore consciousness. I believe that twitter with the help of some URL shortening services will replace newspapers. Faster news and better coverage. Here's a blog post on the topic:
http://www.robvio.us/twitter-url-shortening-services-the-future-of-newspapers

jaiku

Google did have their own Twitter, called Jaiku which they bought and have since scrapped (i think it is still being worked on as a side project by google employees)

Twiiter is growing fast

Twitter is great. It is very flexible and effective.
No wonder google showing their interest now:

Twitter On The Verge Of Killing RSS
http://techunits.com/content/list_all/87/twitter

Twitter

Sorry, but can't help thinking Twitter is a storm in a tea cup. A bit pointless for everyone other than internet marketers.

no way. twitter is the wave

no way. twitter is the wave of the future dude! the faster we can get our information, the more likely that service is to thrive. twitter is THE FASTEST at the moment. it's what blogging was 3 years ago.

Nah read this article

If you read the article you would see what its "great" for. A lot of news stories are on twitter before they even reach the news room. Some tweets are even coming from the people involved in the story. Did you read the ones from the airplane river landing in New York? It's not twitter that's important anymore. It's search.twitter.com that is worth the money.

Twitseek

The search features that Twitter already has are very powerful especially when accessed through the Search API. This also allows extra features to be created such as implemented in Twitseek which makes Twitter Search look like Google Search.

Twitter search features aren't that strong

I don't agree. It seems like the only thing twitseek is doing is not returning a long column of retweets that twitter's own search does. If twitter integrates some concepts from third party apps it can be a true game changer. See the bottom of this post for some ideas of how http://bit.ly/cmbG3