Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Here's why Microsoft has got its mojo back

Ever since the release of Vista, Microsoft has been on the defensive on every front, from operating systems to the Internet, and even to Office. No longer. Given the solid betas of Windows 7 and Office, and the release of Bing, it looks as if Microsoft finally has its mojo back. Here's why.

First, let's look at all the good news Microsoft has had within the last several months. The Windows 7 beta is not only apparently ahead of schedule, but has been very well received. And, as I've recently written, pre-sales are through the roof. As I write this, it is still number 4 on the Amazon best-seller list, even though it's months away from release.

The just-released beta of Office 2010 is a solid piece of work, but more important is that Office will finally be available as a Web-based application. This will likely be enough to fend off Google Apps, because there is no client version of Google Apps, and Google has yet to show Google Apps will be widely accepted in the workplace.

With Bing, Microsoft for the first time has a Web-based search that can rival Google's. There's not a chance it will every overtake Google, but it's already gaining market share, and maybe that's all Microsoft expects from it.

Finally, with the Laptop Hunters ads, Microsoft has put Apple on the defensive, so much so that Apple lawyers called Microsoft to pressure the company into pulling the ads. Microsoft, as you may imagine, declined --- and then exulted.

So what's happened to Microsoft? Why is it that the company floundered for so long, and only now is hitting its stride again?

The primary reason, I believe, is cultural. Microsoft was always at its best when it felt it was an underdog, even if in fact it was an alpha dog. In earlier days of the company, Bill Gates was excellent at creating that underdog culture, but in his later years, one had the sense that his attention had wandered. And once he left, the company culture was adrift.

So why has the company culture changed? Because for the first time in a very, very long time, Microsoft has in fact been an underdog. Google has been on top of Internet search and services, Apple got all the buzz for its new products, and Vista was widely reviled.

I think Microsoft finally recognized that it couldn't just sit on a pot of cash and giant market share. If it didn't start releasing solid products and rethink its Internet strategy, Google over time could even own the desktop.

In short, the company got its hunger back. And the results are starting to show.

That's not to say that the company is perfect --- far from it. It needs to more aggressively Web-enable its applications, it needs to slim down Windows and possibly release it as a series of constantly upgraded mix-and-match components, and it needs to develop breakthrough products in the way that Apple has done.

It's hard to know whether that's possible. But for now, at least, Microsoft has got its mojo back.

What People Are Saying

Microsoft never had mojo, so

Microsoft never had mojo, so it cannot get it back. I think Bing does the same job as Google while being slower in presenting the results. The pre-sales for Windows 7 are through the roof, because the Vista users want to ditch Vista as fast as they can with some XP users in need of a new Windows version (some hardware vendors no longer provide XP drivers) rather go with Windows 7 than even bother with Vista.
And Office 2010? They still got the dreadful ribbon in there and stuffed even more features in it, that the vast majority of people doesn't want to use. At the same time they continue to ignore standards, especially when it comes to HTML rendering. And the online versions are just the answer to what Google and others are doing for years. Microsoft is again too late in the game doing too little for too few.
Add to that the still insane price structure, the shoddy quality, and the lack of interest in end-users and Microsoft is just doing what it always did. The only difference is that they now had a bunch of releases at the same time.
There is nothing, not a single thing, absolutely no piece that isn't already done and established by someone else. There is nothing wrong with copying others, but then at least make it better. Microsoft does not do that.
The Gralla blog is again nothing more than BS glorifying whatever crud Microsoft throws at the market.

MS Mojo?

A recent survey indicated that less than 6% of American enterprises are considering updating to Windows 7. Yes they have finally done Vista properly but they have built something that no one really wants right now.

Still haven't recovered from Windows 2004

Microsoft missed a whole version of Windows in 2004. They are never going to recover from that. They let the Windows market fragment and it's not going back together, it's getting further fragmented. For example, the latest Palm does not run Windows Mobile, it runs a Unix core OS, HTML 5 browser, and ISO MPEG-4 audio video like every other mobile except Microsoft, and just like Macs. Even if those Palm users all have a Windows PC, they cannot be inside Microsoft's vendor lock-in. They need HTML 5 Web apps, they need MPEG-4 media, and they need the Unix-compatible Internet. Microsoft only has the Microsoft versions of these things. Unless you have 100% Microsoft products, you have no use for Windows Media.

Microsoft didn't offer users an upgrade for Windows XP for over 5 years! Think about how long 5 years is in I-T! When Windows XP was released, Google was 3 years old! Mac OS X had just been released after a year long public beta. There was no iPod. That is the time where most of Microsoft's users still live. Upgrading to today will be very hard and very expensive and take a lot of training. So what they move to needs to be very modern and very simplified and very cheap. Windows 7 and Office 2010 are not any of those. You need a fleet of I-T guys just to sit at the Microsoft table.

Microsoft has been making their stuff deliberately incompatible with the rest of the world for so long. Even the Internet and Web has not changed their way of thinking. The Web will turn 20 next year and Microsoft has still not adapted to it except to try and slow it down.

Apple verses MS

I could never get comfortable with an Apple computer at first, after they went to a normal PC, or now.

Just because they are underdogs in market share doesn't make them any different that any other corp. out there.

If they had MS's share. They would be the Co. being called the Darth Vader of that market.

All these word games do not make that animal any different from the rest.

It's all about the Money. Fuzzy words don't guard against a byte.

I've copied this column

so when Win7 disintegrates into virii hell, I can quote you accurately.

CW ran articles that Apple had taken a sales "hit" due to the recession! Huh? Read today's headlines?

The best PC to run Windows is a MacBook Pro. No, you can't have one for $400. But, then, have you actually touched a $400 PC?

Time to bathe.

PR rehash from Redmond should not be proffered as news. That's how the work "hack" came into being.

Microsoft, as you may imagine

"so much so that Apple lawyers called Microsoft to pressure the company into pulling the ads. Microsoft, as you may imagine, declined --- and then exulted."

This is fast becoming an urban legend. One guy at Microsoft posts this in his blog and it's picked up and relayed around the world like it's gospel. And yet not one shred of proof that Apple ever called. Knowing Apple's lawyers, I would at least think that the idiot would be able to point to a "cease and desist" order.

Wait an minute... Microsoft's lawyers just called me and told me to stop doubting this story or they'll take me to court.

Huh?

The comment you posted has been flagged as potential spam. It will not be visible until the site administrator has a chance to review it

Huh? (Back At Ya')

Hey Anonymous:

"..comment you posted..."? Which comment?

Having recently read many of your comments. I appreciate, in general, your wit and brevity. However, it's often really tough to follow what the h*** you're talking about. Please take an extra breath and make sure that you've made your case. Otherwise, I, for one, will just skip "Anonymous".

Thank you.

Err...

Don't you mean the article?

;-) just kidding, Preston, I love ya, man!

What's Going to Happen to 800M XP Machines?

Many of them are quite healthy. I believe after end-of-support for XP, many will migrate to GNU/Linux just for the support. It does not make sense to put "7" on many of these because the labour+licence is far more than the value of the machines. Even older machines can run as thin clients.

The postulated sales are overblown.