Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
Angela Gunn's picture
Angela Gunn

Pushing Buttons

Hiring hackers: Safety in numbers?

Sometimes A Great Notion Dept.: Your Kevin Mitnicks, your Frank Abagnales, your Jérôme Kerviels -- what are we supposed to do with our hackers and crackers and social engineers, especially once they've done their time?

Mitnick and Abagnale, both of whom have paid their debt to society (whatever that means these days), have parleyed their knowledge into security work and public speaking, at which both excel for pretty much the same reasons they were good at what they did to get themselves a reputation. Now Kerviel, who's accused of circumventing risk controls at Société Générale (his then-employer) to disguise billions of dollars in bad trading decisions, is doing the consulting thing.

Which seems reasonable to me -- obviously better to involve this guy in computers than finance, based on his track record. (Did I mention billions of dollars?) On the other hand, I wonder if there isn't a fantastic job-placement opportunity for someone out there to job-place hackers in pairs. It's the Vegas model as explained by Ace Rothstein: Everybody's gotta watch everybody else. If I were in the market to hire a reformed hacker or social engineer and was slightly paranoid about it, I think I'd want to get another one and make sure they're on opposite sides of a zero-sum situation.

What do you think -- million-dollar human-resources idea or what?

What People Are Saying

Hiring ExCons

As the resident "living fossil" in many of these discussions, I have a "long view" on many issues. I believe that we, as a society, need to do a better job of handling our ex-convicts. The moral lessons which used to be taught at home and in school are no longer being taught, except in Sunday School. For most modern young people, that is not enough. In my experience working with young people, most crimes are "crimes of opportunity" and the smarter they are, the more opportunities they see. Without the moral compass to give them pause, they just "go for it." Most are not truly evil, at least when they go into prison. When they get out of prison, they need a way to get on with their lives in a meaningful way. They need jobs where their knowledge and skills can be utilized. If we lock them out of the ability to advance themselves educationally, financially and socially, we force them back into criminal behaviour, just to get by. It would be wise, however, to require them to undergo continuing counseling and increased supervision for several years as a condition of their employment. Sort of like when you have the fox guarding the henhouse, make sure you have someone watching over the fox.

one potential problem...

Hire 2 or more very smart guys with past that shows more than the usual level of ethical flexibility in mutually adversarial roles, and they just may resent it, and perhaps choose to work together in a big score.

There's a name for this...

Can you say, "Moral hazard"?