Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

HP buys EDS: You fools! You fools!

Does any major technology company have a worse record when it comes to buying other companies than HP? I mean come on. Do you recall how well the Compaq buy out went? Come to think of it, where is fired CEO, the genius behind that deal, Carly Fiorina working now anyway?

Sure Compaq may have worked out in the long run, but people who argue this seem to skip answering the questions: "Did HP really get anything from buying Compaq?" and "Couldn't HP have developed its hybrid PC sales model without Compaq?" Seems to me, HP just wasted 25-billion big ones on Compaq.

I find it really hard to understand the logic of HP buying EDS in the first place. Yes, I get it, HP wants to more of the services biz, but EDS, while a monster company -- $22-billion in revenue, has been treading water for years.

EDS' stock in trade is infrastructure management and custom application services. Wait, doesn't HP already do infrastructure management? Is this deal really going to expand HP's service offerings?

Besides to do these kinds of services well, you need experts. Kids with their freshly HP ink-jet printed diplomas aren't exactly ready to pull together custom application bundles for Fortune 500 companies. So, what does Mark Hurd, HP's CEO say? He says things like "squeeze costs" and "If we do get the cost synergies done-and we will-we think this thing has tremendous opportunity." Hurd doesn't want smart staffers he wants automation.

Meanwhile, over in EDS land, a friend of mine passed me a memo from their CEO, Ron Rittenmeyer, which included the phrase, "Obviously, this news means major changes for everyone involved. There are many questions to be answered and decisions to be made in the coming months."

Let me translate that for those of you who aren't familiar with corporate executive double-talk: "We're going to fire your asses." EDS staffers -- ah, there's another one on my IM now -- know exactly what this jargon means and they're already looking for new jobs.

By the time, this deal closes in the second half of 2008, what's already a questionable buyout by HP, will have become a complete waste of money. EDS staffers with real skills will already be out the door. Afterwards, it will be Mark Hurd's turn to try to explain to the board exactly what went wrong this time. I hope you have better luck than Carly did Mark, but I doubt you'll be able to make a better case for keeping your job than she did.

RSS feed icon Like this stuff? Subscribe to the RSS feed.

What People Are Saying

The HP/Compaq merger was not

The HP/Compaq merger was not the complete failure that you talking heads would have everyone believing. You also have to stop thinking in terms of just PCs. Carly had a fairly good vision, she just couldn't execute, especially fast enough for the "give me my money back this quarter" mentality of Wall Street. Proof of that is that Hurd came in and really didn't substantially change the strategy or structure of the company. He just knew how to execute with what was there. There have been tweaks and adjustments in the time he has been at the helm to adjust to the changing market but there are still the same 3 major business divisions of the company as when Carly left.

Hurd isn't the dummy you claim he is. Your EDS buddies have to take care of themselves and do what they think is best for their individual situations. However, if they take a "wait and see" attitude, they might find that it's not all completely bad and might even find some new opportunities they didn't have before.

EDS currently has a

EDS currently has a certified multi-billion dollar cash cow in the NMCI (Navy Marine Corps Intranet) contract, but that contract/concept is up for review/rebid in 2010. Ask the people who use the NMCI system daily and the vast majority will agree that it's a disaster. I've never used a more user-hostile system. There's a special place in Hell for the DOD/DON people who signed/approved that initial contract. IMHO, the writing's on the wall; the USMC has already decided to opt out and the Navy's considering which parts (if not all) of the currently contracted functions to bring back in-house. So this EDS cash stream will probably dry up shortly. Then whatcha gonna do, HP?

I wouldn't say that a

I wouldn't say that a company that is second only to IBM in their core mission (services) as, "treading water". HP currently grosses about $16B in services. EDS is around $22B. The purchase would more than double HP's capacity in that arena. And they're getting it for just over half a year's revenue. And you don't understand the logic of this?

bean counter school.....

We see the logic of this clearly Mr. MBA bean counter.... Rape Rape Rape employees. I hope management gets nothing out of it but red faces..Remember when HP family members had to come in and paddle top management last time? (Carly?).

None of you understand business from a customer relationship standpoint. Joe Technician who's been on site at a Navy base for 10 years (who the customer likes and has confidence in) IS EDS to the customer! Now he can't answer any of their questions as to what will happen. All this is is the same crap over and over...Customer be dammed. Customer will take a hike.

You cannot merge yourself into a profit !!!!!!!!
I haven't seen it happen yet. (I don't count IBM anymore because they are a shell company that outsources and runs phony employment ads for every city around the country).

Fire Hurd Today!!!! before they spend 18 billion for what?

Wrong side of the bed?

If you can't figure out what HP got from Compaq it's hard to understand how you are qualified to comment on the industry. Oh wait - the press doesn't have to be qualified or know anything to write words do they?

Easy to sit on the sidelines and be negative.

I agree

I think you hit the nail directly on the head! I have seen the same thing played out on a smaller scale.

I am for free enterprise and capitalism. I think it is the best system with the most opportunities, however it only works with strong ethics and moral character. If companies continue to abuse employees we will have no recourse but to be ruled by the government.

I have to admit I am so tired of seeing thousands of employees being fired and their only crime is building a company worth buying. I'm almost in favor of a law that would protect the employee as an asset of the company by requiring at least five years compensation to any employee who is displaced in the transaction. In addition all employees of the purchased company should be compensated with stock in the new company based on their tenure.

Actually

while you may not recall but HP got the assets of DEC in the Compaq deal ...

and while it's understandable that a PC centric world would not understand the value of that it is huge ...

DEC engineers did (and still do) understand TRUE enterprise computing at an EXTREME quality level ... something that the folk in Round Rock and Redmond have still to understand ... let alone master ...

so while I will withhold my analysis of the EDS deal I will say that pairing the former Computing Engineers of DEC with the Engineers at HP was a very good thing for those of us who care about QUALITY computing ... stuff that 1) doesn't break, 2) doesn't need constant patching/maintenance, and 3) is supremely secure ... stuff you would like to bet your company, life, and/or way of life on ... and not currently on the PC top 100 list

and MS. Carly ??? heard she's in politics where style over substance is unfortunatly too much of a way of life

Agreed. DEC engineers, from

Agreed. DEC engineers, from everything I've heard, were much happier and more productive working with HP than they had been when they had to deal with Compaq.

Steven

DEC engineers?

And how many of those are still employed? Like many companies that do mergers and acquisitions, HP has laid
off those engineers. The people who were the glue who made the products work. The few that are left get paid well. But they aren't developing anything new. They are just hoping they can keep the job long enough to retire.

HP has market share. That is the only thing keeping them alive. They don't have crap as far innovation.

There are still more of them

There are still more of them around than you think, working on new and interesting stuff. Yes, many of them are gone through layoffs, early retirement packages and attrition. The same can be said for folks that made up all of the pre-merger companies (HP, Compaq, DEC, Tandem and so many others that have been folded in over the years).