Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

I want a real Linux and Mac version of Chrome

CodeWeavers, best known for making its CrossOver programs that use WINE to run many popular Windows applications on Linux and Mac OS, has just released a proof-of-concept version of Chrome that runs on Linux and Mac systems.

The free CrossOver version of Chrome, CrossOver Chrome, is based on Google's open-source Chromium code. It's not, however, an actual port of Chrome to Linux or Mac OS X. Instead, using their expertise in bringing Windows applications to other operating systems, the CrossOver developers have ported the Windows version of Chrome to Linux and Mac.

It's a neat trick, and it does work. While others at ComputerWorld got it to work on Mac OS X, albeit with fits and starts, I've been running it for over a day now on one of my openSUSE 11 PCs without a hitch. That said, as the CrossOver Chrome FAQ says to the question: "Should I run CrossOver Chromium as my main browser? Absolutely not! This is just a proof of concept, for fun, and to showcase what Wine can do."

So, just because it's working for me, don't assume for a second that it's going to work well for you. This version of Chrome is an experiment and a demonstration of what you can do with WINE. It's not a native Linux or Mac OS X version of Chrome. And, that annoys me.

I really, really like Chrome. I've found it to be faster than blazes and its design to make the most out of Web-based applications. Heck, even running with WINE on my openSUSE machine it's SunSpider JavaScript score was 1,811.6ms, handily beating Firefox 3.01's 3,131.2 score on the same machine: an HP A6040N Pavilion Desktop PC with a1.86 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo E6320 dual-core processor and 2GB of RAM and 320 GB of SATA hard drive.

Since Chrome is open source, it shouldn't take much to bring a native version to either Linux or Mac OS X. Or, to be more specific, to bring it to Mac's Aqua interface or Linux's KDE or GNOME interfaces. Chrome's core code can be used on any platform. The troublesome part is that Chrome's open-source interface code is Windows-specific. So, Google, or someone, needs to get to work on getting Chrome to look good on the other platforms.

That's a hint folks. I want real Chrome on Linux and Mac OS and I want it Now. Come on, how hard can it be? CrossOver pulled bringing the Windows version over a few weeks, I know Google, or some open-source developers who know their way around a GUI can give us a native Chrome. So, how's about it? Can we get Chrome over to Linux and Mac OS by say mid-October? I think it's doable. Do you?

What People Are Saying

What?!

From your article it seems you like chrome foremost because he's fast. Well, that the engine, not the GUI. That engine is available on mac more or less 1:1, and with a few rough corners on linux.

That engine is WebKit, which powers Safari, and is a fork of KHTML, the engine that powers Konqueror, the KDE Browser.

Those are avalible since forever..

I'll wait for a native Linux version

I gave the CrossOver Chromium version a try, and then went on my way using my normal browser, SeaMonkey, plus the other 12 or 13 browsers I have around for the hell of it. There was nothing so compelling about Chromium that I felt I just couldn't live without it!

Once there's a native Linux version of Chrome, I'll give that a try, but I don't imagine it'll replace SeaMonkey for me, as I use it not only for its browser but also for its mail/newsgroup clients.

"Since Chrome is open

"Since Chrome is open source, it shouldn't take much to bring a native version to either Linux or Mac OS X."

Ah yes, of course. Just a small matter of programming, as usual. I'm not sure what annoys me more, ignorant non-tech types or ignorant tech-types who really should know better.

Open source != easy or effortless.

Google better release a Mac and Linux version soon

Mozilla is revving up to release Firefox 3.1, which has a far faster Javascript engine than Chrome. Firefox 3.1 is easily faster than Chrome. If Google doesn't release Chrome for Linux or Mac soon, they will lose any speed advantage Chrome has.

Working cross-over on 64bit Intel

Under Ubuntu 8.04 64bit the crossover works well.

Booting WinXP 64bit on same hardware, Google's Chrome crashes alarmingly often and is unusable.

I say "Top Drawer" & "Good Show" to CodeWeaver!

Google IS working on Mac and Linux versions

From what I've heard, they've been working on all 3 concurrently. It's just that the Windows version is the first to come to a stable enough state that they could release a public Beta of the browser.

On the other hand, it does seem that the Linux and Mac versions are getting less attention by the google developers than the Windows version (which is evident from the fact that we already have the Windows version).

I do hope that they have beta releases of the Linux and Mac versions out before the Full release of the Windows version.

I want a real Linux and Mac version of Chrome

Google programmers are beginning to look high and mighty, arrogant, youngster-stupid or just plain lazy. I will probably never run Applesauce and just haven't gotten around to Linux but I am getting there. They seem to have been brainwashed by the "other side" that only XP and Vista exist. I have built or upgraded several family/friend computers with XP but I still happen to like W2000. From what I have seen, most software that runs on XP will also run on 2000 and if it doesn't.....no big deal. Google doesn't give us the option to try, you can't even load it! This also applies to most of the "Google Pack", or worse, you can't even download it with less than XP. I understand them ignoring 3.1 and 95 but the rest are not dead by a long shot. They need to learn that they are writing software for users/customers, whether they are running Linux, Apple, or some version of Windows that predates their college experience.

Chrome

Don't know what all the fuss is about. I installed this and it's slower than Firefox on my dual AMD 2 gig machine. I'll be dumping it.

Ha, already beat you to it,

Ha, already beat you to it, Big Joe. I mean, seriously, what a sorry excuse for a browser. And that this author actually likes it speaks volumes to his taste in user interface. "If you like Linux, you'll LOVE Chrome!" I'm sure I would. But I don't. Prolly never will, neither.

Chrome

Big Joe says,"Don't know what all the fuss is about. I installed this and it's slower than Firefox on my dual AMD 2 gig machine."

Besides which you have to put up with horrible moving adverts on Chrome because it has no adblocking plugin.

I haven't found Chrome faster the Firefox either, on two machines similar to Big Joe's. If there was a measurable difference, it wasn't noticeable in real-world browsing.