Ads by TechWords
Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

iPod Classic: One step forward, two steps back

Back in 2005, when I was connived into buying a fourth-generation iPod, I wasn't sure what use I'd find for it. As it turned out, plenty: I now subscribe to dozens of podcasts that a few years ago I had no means to enjoy. So I was dismayed when I booted up the iPod this past Thanksgiving and was presented with the sad Mac icon.

Connecting it to my laptop or an AC adaptor wouldn't charge it, so the situation seemed grave indeed. A trip to the Genius Bar confirmed that the hard drive was likely at fault and beyond simple repairs. The Genius recommended I send the iPod to iResQ, but no free evaluations are to be found at that firm, and I didn't wish to pay good money to be told what I already knew: it's dead, Jim. Rather than recycle the iPod at the store in exchange for 10% off a new player, I bought an iPod Classic bundle at an online dealer.

Big mistake -- not the online dealer, but the iPod Classic. This sixth-generation iPod's operating system has some significant changes from my older iPod Photo, and they're not for the better:

  1. The interface now takes up only half the inbuilt display screen. The right half is dedicated to a Ken Burns effect of my album art, which is gratuitous and unnecessary. Disabling album art eliminates this feature, but doing so also prevents art from being shown while listening to individual songs or albums. It's an all-or-nothing deal.
  2. Navigating the menus is a slower process. My stopwatch tells me that the time between clicking on a menu item and the next submenu appearing can be as much as five seconds. Why?
  3. Even navigating a single menu is tedious, due to an overload of information. Whereas previously only a single line of data -- song title, album name, genre, artist, or playlist -- would be listed, now the iPod crams as much data as possible for each selection. Do I really need to know how many songs compose a playlist? I used to be able to see 8-10 song titles per page; now it's down to 4-5, slowing down my selection process.
  4. This one's the killer: the clicking sound played over the iPod's inbuilt speaker now plays over the line-out jack as well. This means scrolling through the menu causes my car's entire sound system to click loudly. Internal vs. external clicking options are not "one or the other", but "both or neither" -- and disabling it altogether eliminates an aural feedback I need to navigate the menus without taking my eyes off the road.

Neither Linux nor Rockbox nor Rockbox support the iPod Classic, and I'm told neither of those alternative iPod operating systems supports the playing of DRM songs anyway, so either would've precluded me from 15% of my iTunes library anyway. It seemed alternative hardware was the only solution. When a co-worker lent me his fifth-gen iPod Video for examination, I found that, though the first three faults listed above had not yet been introduced by that point in the MP3 player's evolution, the dual clicking noise was both present and intolerable.  I had to go further back.

I related this conundrum to a friend who was with me when I bought my iPod two years ago. He'd bought his iPod at the same time, and after a recent battery replacement, it was still working beautifully. Despite my above complaints, he's willing to trade my new iPod Classic for his like-new iPod Photo -- an offer I'll gladly take. The fewer functions a tool serves, the better it does them, and my simple needs don't include mobile videos anyway. Had my iPod Photo not broken, it would've continued to satisfy me indefinitely, so I'm happy to return to that older generation.

What People Are Saying

Rate this
Rated +37
261 Votes

Rockbox on ipod

I think you can play DRM files through the Rockbox firmware. You still have access to the itunes database; it just sounds crap compared to the FLAC files you can easily drag and drop onto your machine.

Anyway, screw apple. When my 5th gen dies I'll get an iaudio and have format freedom built in. itunes was a great innovation and ipod was wonderful in its day but apple's vista moment can't be far off, judging by the iphone and the macbook air. Too expensive; too smug; too inflexible: they were products for good economic times.

Rate this
Rated +52
348 Votes

since when has rockbox

since when has rockbox worked on any mp3 player at the time of release? It usually takes months if not years of development to get rockbox working on a mp3 player. If you think that these Corporations support or condole the use of third party "hacked" firmware on their hardware then you are truly mistaken. Why would they want you to install rockbox and not use itunes drmed music that you buy from them? they will do everything in their power to make sure that rockbox/third party firmwares don't work on their devices for one simple reason: THEY LOSE MONEY!!! While i disagree with the total lock down of hardware with checksums on firmware, if you were apple would you want people to use an alternative firmware and have your company potentially lose millions or dollars of revenue from people buying itunes music? Think about that. All they care about is money. while this is wrong, it is human nature so don't expect them to put out ipods that can be hacked days or even weeks after the are released. And giving the ipod classic a bad review because of this is simply stupid. I guess if you have been living on the dark side of the moon for the last 10 years and don't know about ipods or apple's marketing strategies then you are justified in being pissed off at them for locking down the player, but that simply is not true. GET A FREAKIN CLUE SHERLOCK!!

Rate this
Rated +23
199 Votes

Learn to read

giving the ipod classic a bad review because of this is simply stupid.

Please show me where this happened, and I'll eat my iPod.

Rate this
Rated -6
528 Votes

iPod Classic: One step forward, two steps back

Stop being so neg! if its so bad why get one??? Why dont you make something better? Everything has there faults thats why newer models come out. Maybe your in the wrong industry??

If you dont like Ipod's dont get one full stop. If your scene you'll have or 2 maybe. Its like having betamax in a world of dvd due to Blu-ray.

Rate this
Rated +34
516 Votes

the clicking problem

Hi Alan.

I just bought an iPod Classic myself and was also very annoyed by the clicking noise the iPod makes while scrolling through menus being played through the jack line. However this noise can be easily turned off in the settings menu on the iPod.

I still agree that it should be possible to turn off all the information the ipod gives in the menus though. Maybe not including that would stop it freezing while scrolling through menus.

We should keep in mind that this iPod is still a new model and maybe Apple will sort these things out in future software updates, alternatively the geek-made operating systems will probably catch up soon enough.

Joss

Rate this
Rated +25
623 Votes

Software Update

There was a software update that took care of the unresponsiveness problem.

Although I hate to throw rocks and won't question your intelligence, this was a very poor article, review or whatever you want to call it.

Rate this
Rated -30
566 Votes

Elaborate?

I gave you my reasons; could you give me yours?

FYI, iTunes had downloaded to my Classic the most recent iPod software update available at the time. It did not change my experience.

Rate this
Rated -38
628 Votes

Alternate iPod Operating Systems?

So some geek's efforts to 'do better' by breaking the product aren't supported by the latest one and that's a product fault?

You are truly a moron - though your points about unresponsiveness are quite valid, this has been cropping up in various Apple products of late. Too many high-level design decisions being made by low-level technical people. It doesn't bode well.

McD

Rate this
Rated +17
441 Votes

wrong

Their goal isn't to break it. installing Linux on an ipod is just that, Linux on an ipod. It's not like Linux on an ipod=breaking your hard drive. Just because people take initiative to make something better doesn't make them destructive. I love how you say: "you are truly a moron - Because you are right about everything you posted."

I feel Apple really did take steps back with the classic, and I feel you are truly a moron for not accepting his valid opinion.

Rate this
Rated +25
573 Votes

No fault

I said only that Linux and Rockbox were incompatible with the iPod Classic. Why would you interpret that fact as a condemnation? Perhaps you'd rather I'd tried to install their software on unsupported hardware anyway?