Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Is Microsoft getting ready to kill Windows?

No, I'm not talking about killing Vista. Microsoft is already burying that living dead operating system as fast it can. I'm talking about killing Windows itself. That's the conclusion I've drawn from David Worthington's story about Microsoft's plans for Midori, a next generation operating system.

According to Worthington, who managed to get his hands on Microsoft's internal documents, "Midori is an offshoot of Microsoft Research's Singularity [a limited open-source] operating system, the tools and libraries of which are completely managed code. Midori is designed to run directly on native hardware (x86, x64 and ARM), be hosted on the Windows Hyper-V hypervisor, or even be hosted by a Windows process."

Microsoft's objective for Midori, writes Worthington, is no less than replacing Windows. "Microsoft is carefully mapping out migration strategies to move customers from Windows to Midori, its planned legacy-free operating environment, virtualization, and a composite application model that permits applications to be hosted by both OSes, are key to the strategy."

It's about time!

Windows, for all its popularity, has been outdated trash almost since its beginnings. Its chief twin problems, from where I sit, have always been that it's a single user operating system in a multi-user networked world and its programming model that can't tell the difference between data and code. Put them together and you get such useful, but totally insecure, program interfaces as DDE (Dynamic Data Exchange), OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) and ActiveX.

The result is an operating system where it's easy to exchange date between programs like Excel and Word, and just as easy to infect systems with malware via Internet Explorer. Windows was insecure from day one and nothing, Nothing, will ever change that. Its insecurity is built in. Is it any wonder that 16,000 Web sites a day are being compromised to bring malware to Windows systems? With Windows as the most popular desktop operating system, it's like shooting fish in a barrel.

Midori, on the other hand, is being "from the ground up to be connected." That's key. If they do that, then they might have something worth using.

"Microsoft [also] intends for Midori to be componentized from the beginning to achieve performance and security benefits." That's also good news. I have to say that I like the sound of Midori.

The sooner Microsoft kills off Windows and moves to Midori the better as far as I'm concerned. There's only one thing they need to do to make it perfect. Singularity is already sort of open source, how about making Midori really open source?

Now, Microsoft will never go with the GPL. That just isn't going to happen. But why couldn't Microsoft use a version of the Mozilla license or Sun's variant on it, the CDDL (Common Development and Distribution License)? That way, Microsoft still gets to call the shots, but they also get the potential advantage of open-source developer support.

Yes, it would be a radical change. Yes, I know some people, like blogger and former Microsoftie Robert Scoble,dismiss the idea of Windows being replaced out of hand. But, doesn't Microsoft need a revolution?

Vista's going no-where. Linux and Mac are both gaining on the desktop. And, Windows 7 may yet turn out to be just Vista SP2, since I note that now the plan is for Windows 7 to remain a 32-bit operating system. If I were in charge of Microsoft, I wouldn't be thrilled with any of this.

Unfortunately, Ballmer is at Microsoft's controls. Ugh.

I doubt that he has the vision to see that Microsoft needs to reinvent itself for the 21st century. Still, just the fact that Eric Rudder, senior vice president for technical strategy at Microsoft, is in charge of Midori gives me some hope that something may come of it. Come to think of it, there was a time when Rudder was considered as someone who might take Microsoft's helm. Now if Ballmer were to be fired and Rudder took charge... hmmm...

What People Are Saying

end of windoZ means THE End!

APPLE was the pioneer in EVERYTHING. Bill Gates was brilliant in his marketing and promotion strategies. That's all.
APPLE was and is the BEST COMPUTER COMPANY.
Mac is a real computer for real people.
Apple is worth more than Google now.
I'm sure it won't stop there and will be worth more than Microsoft as well.
Whatever Microsoft is trying, is waste of their efforts.
By the time midori is out, APPLE will have at least 30% of the market, with an even better and brilliant OS - Leopard Snow or Leopard Spring/Summer or even a newer one.

Apple is not just growing. It's growing at a jet speed.
ALL Apple products are the most innovative and most popular:
iPod, iPhone, QuickTime, MacAir...
21st century belongs to Apple.
Microsoft is a living dead.

I like Apple but...!

Easy there champ. I run an all-Apple network, it's great but like any platform/movement it has its shortcomings. Also remember that companies tend to get lazy and unscrupulous as their market shares grow, so what we should be aiming for is a diverse OS offering for the 21st century.

Uh, no. Apple was just about

Uh, no. Apple was just about as bad as Microsoft at copying stuff. GUIs? Personal Computers? UNIX? That and Apple is too much of a form over function company to produce any serious computers.

DO NOT GET ME WRONG. Microsoft is garbage, this is why I'm a Linux user, so I'm actually using something better than Windows and Mac.

Of course, you're probably not reading this the second I disagreed with you, since you write like the typical Apple fanboy, thinking Apple actually created things rather than copying or buying them like Microsoft does.

You know it is really funny...

As a certified Microsoft Towel Boy... (It pays the bills)

Microsoft wanted to do years ago what IBM did with OS/2... have a nice operating system with smooth lines and fast UI. But it took them till XP to make it because they kept trying Corvette engines in a Ugo body! Cummon guys!!! START OVER!

I have been working with systems since 486's and Win3 and I'm tired of MS "trying" to get where people want it. My new system is a MacBook Pro. I've not been friendly with the Macs ever but since they moved to X86 and Leopard they've really made some strides toward a good OS.

Yeah they screwed up with iTunes/Safari/Quicktime but MS has been getting away with that crap for years. At least Apple has quickly moved to allow you to not download it after a large public outcry. Like it or not competition is good and may move us farther forward with technology.

Need to get simple

I'm not sure how, but computing needs to get back to the UNIX concept of SIMPLE SINGLE FUNCTION modules that can be connected to perform more complex tasks.

Why, if I want (or need) to watch a quicktime movie I have to load a ton of crap from apple including Safari and Itunes. (I know I am exaggerating a bit, I don't HAVE to load all that, but they will TRY to get me to!).

Same for a PDF file, load 30Megs of Adobe junk! (I know there are alternatives to this too. But, not for 98% of the computing public).

More often than not some new vulnerability is for some "feature" in an application that I've never even heard of let alone need.

And, of course there is Vista. I'm sure that much less than 1% of the code you get with Vista could really be considered the OS. The rest are applications.

Simple is only good for simple tasks

Does anyone still sit around piping stuff through those silly little trivial, and often inconsistent, UNIX programs?

Every Day

If you don't understand the power of bash or a decent shell, I pity you.

RE: Is M$ getting ready to kill Windoze??

[sarcasm mode="extreme"]

Really!!!! When?????

M$ could not kill Windoze fast enough for me.

BTW, M$ and Innovation - two concepts that are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE!

Just like SCO, someone needs to kill the M$ "vampire" with a silver stake!

To me, Windoze is the equivalent of pestilence, and as a virulent infection, it must be wiped from the face of the Earth.

[/sarcasm]

Arguing with the "We Hate

Arguing with the "We Hate Microsoft" crowd is like discussing politics with a Republican: both groups have all the answers - to EVERYTHING - and woe be it to anyone who would dare say otherwise.

Are you saying there is an

Are you saying there is an answer to Windows woeful security?