Is this hardware for real? Prove it!
- TAGS:government, hardware, real, vendors
- IT TOPICS:Security
I can understand how the government is seeking to have vendors verify that the equipment they’re selling the government is authentic. According to Gautham Nagesh’s article, hundreds of pieces of hardware being used by the government (and later seized) was in fact, counterfeit. Those products are usually inferior and can wind up being very costly – especially when they result in network failures and data loss. Nagesh notes for example, that the FBI seized over 400 pieces of bogus Cisco network hardware.
Right now government agencies are weighing in on whether or not vendors should be required to authenticate the hardware and software they’re selling to the government and failing to do so would make them liable. The current situation doesn’t require that sort of verification, and obviously counterfeit pieces are finding their way into our government agencies and networks.
I’m just not sure it’s going to be feasible to have vendors comply with the added burden of authentication regulations. Says Nagesh, "The contracting community is likely to be split on the issue, with original equipment manufactures predisposed to some sort of safeguards, while resellers, which might have a harder time assessing that the equipment they buy is original, are likely to oppose the additional liability."
I’m guessing that legitimate vendors will find it preferable to authenticate their products rather than risk losing sales or having their products counterfeited.



