Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Author: IT isn't like construction, and ROI doesn't work for IT

Michael Gentle -- a former Computerworld columnist -- has a new book out titled, "IT Success! Towards a new model for information technology," and it's full of provocative ideas.

First, the construction analogy. Gentle says:

"The fundamental error of reasoning in the traditional IT business model is to assume software can be conceived upfront like a house, and subsequently scoped, spec'd and signed off for commitment by both client and vendor -- and that the documented business benefits will start flowing once the solution has been delivered."

Gentle says nothing could be farther from the truth. IT projects are full of risks from the get-go. The business is constantly moving, so user requirements are constantly changing and can't be cast in stone at the outset. IT systems have to be continually reworked. And there's no guarantee the expected benefits will happen.

The construction industry, he says, works with standard products and components, standard categories of labor and standard costs. In IT, those things are anything but standard.

Gentle also takes on the whole ROI movement. He says that "software investments are not the same as physical investments like plant, property and equipment, which can be analyzed in isolation for ROI." IT systems aren't standalone things; "they are integrated parts of an enterprise whole, linking in one way or another the demand and supply chains, from marketing and sales through order management and customer service." The benefits are multi-faceted, too. And that all makes ROI for IT so extremely difficult to calculate.

Gentle goes further, saying that IT investments shouldn't have to go head-to-head with other business investments in the competition for funding. Because they're just different!

"From a purely financial perspective, an IT project is arguably one of the worst investments you could make," Gentle says. As IT investment manager John Spanenberg at ING Bank put it:

"In terms of gambling, first there is horse racing, then there is poker, and then comes software development."

Gentle writes approvingly of author/consultant Harwell Thrasher's views on ROI (from a Computerworld interview here). Thrasher says a high-ROI project could actually make a company more rigid, not more flexible. And people who write ROI proposals tend to overstate the return, understate the costs, and neglect risk. Thrasher put it this way:

"[T]he project with the highest ROI on paper tends to be the one with the most creative proposal writer."

------------
Related:
CRM: Get Sales Chiefs on Your Side, by Michael Gentle
CRM: Ready or Not?, by Michael Gentle
IT benefits too intangible to measure? Balderdash!

What People Are Saying

ROI is no good as we dont know what we are doing?

The problem with putting a value on IT project is the metric and not that it is an IT project. ROI has flaws when the cash flows change signs. So why bother with that metric. The best method so far, has been the Net Present Value (NPV) approach and evaluating for a long term say five years. Couple that with the rigor of project selection based on Asset Allocation model used in Finance, there would be a whittling down of junk estimates by the gifted writer and estimator of the value of the IT project.

And, you do not need to have the whole design defined and signed off for an IT project to be successful. Where have you been these past 20 years? did yu not come up against Prototyping?

Actually the author is all for prototyping

Amin,

Of course Mitch couldn't cover the whole book in one post, but having read it, the author is all for prototyping (or iterative development as he calls it).

You're so right.

Very true: The book author is all for prototyping (I just didn't happen to mention it in my focus on the more thought-provoking parts of the book). Thanks for the accurate comment!
--- Mitch

More ...ROI is no good as we dont know what we are doing?

In the old ComputerWorld of the 1980s there was a very good piece about evaluating projects using Linear Algebra. Fir the life of me, I can not recall the author. The method even allowed for the CEO pet project to not usurp the funding. What we now lack are C* people who are willing to take a stand against ideas akin to "going to Tokyo by bicycle in the winter across northern Canada".

Time to make that different

IT has become a commodity. If it weren't, if IT were still special, the jobs wouldn't be being performed in OOMPA-LOOMPA or wherever they are being done today.

I'd say to all IT managers... get you head out of the bit bucket and learn how to practice and preach ROI. Figure out how to become a profit center, a resource to the company. Otherwise, Stefan will be doing your work remotely from his home in Siberia very soon.