Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

It's time for Microsoft to kill Vista Home Basic

It's been well over a year since Microsoft launched Vista, and it's time for Microsoft to finally pull the plug on Vista Home Basic. Retailers hate it, users are annoyed and frustrated with it, and it's outgrown any initial purpose it may have had.

It's a bit unclear why Microsoft created Vista Home Basic in the first place. It doesn't include Aero, Windows Media Center, or Windows DVD Maker. You can easily make the argument that is isn't Windows Vista at all. At least some Microsoft execs seem to agree. In an August 10, 2005 email Microsoft Director Rajesh Srinivasan refers to Vista Home Basic as "Windows 2006," a clear indication that he didn't consider it Vista.

It appears that Microsoft create Vista Home Basic so that people buying less powerful PCs could still run Vista. But retailers, who you would expect to be happy about the plan to create Vista Basic because it could help them sell more PCs, were unanimous in wishing Vista Home Basic had never been created. In a February 2006 email, here's what Microsoft exec Robin Leonard had to say about Wal-Mart's unhappiness with Vista Home Basic:

They are extremely disappointed in the fact that standards were lowered and feel like customer confusion will ensure...They also went so far as to say that they wished Windows Vista Home Basic was not even in the sku line up.

Wal-Mart wasn't alone. Office Depot felt just as strongly. Following are excerpts from a February 1, 2006 email from Microsoft exec Troy Nelson about a meeting he had with Office Depot:

  • We created confusion with the Home vs Pro with XP launch. Channel was looking forward to the next major OS release to make it better. Concerned that we made it more confusing not less. They pointed out that Apple has 1 OS, not multiple.
  • Home Basic will not possess the major feature sets that MS is focusing on, such as Aero & Flip. Concerned that we advertise "Vista" with these features, but there will be cust dissatisfation & returns when they buy Home Basic & don't get those features.
  • They would have preferred that MS not have a Home Basic. They see this Vista variant as selling down. But since we are releasing it & they know their competitors will carry it, they will be forced to assort to maintain competitive offering.

Consumers, as we know, are unhappy with Vista Home Basic, and that unhappiness is at the core of the the lawsuit against Microsoft for a marketing scheme in which people claim that Microsoft misled consumers into buying the Windows Vista Capable PCs, even though the PCs couldn't run the most important features of Vista.

Given all that, it's time to finally pull the plug. Fewer and fewer PCs sold today can handle Aero, and they're at the very bottom of any PC maker's lineup. If a PC can't handle real Vista, Microsoft should allow it to be shipped with XP. Over time, there will be fewer of those PCs sold anyway.

Even back during Vista's launch, when there were far more computers that couldn't handle true Vista, Home Basic was on a minority of PCs sold. According to the Current Analysis Web site, for example, for the week ending February 3, 2007, only 33% of desktops and 16% of laptops came with Vista Home Basic. You can be sure that the numbers are far lower today.

Microsoft is most likely hoping that Vista Home Basic will die a slow death. But as long as it's being sold, it will annoy and mislead consumers, so it's time to go.

[Like this blog? Subscribe to the RSS feed here!]

What People Are Saying

Poorly written

On top of the false claim that Aero and Microsoft DVD maker are the most important features of Vista, this blog is poorly written.

"Fewer and Fewer computers today can handle aero"

He menat fewer can't handle aero, which is a bit of a double negative. There were many other typos. He should have read over his blog.

Let me also note that Home Basic doesn't have the most NOTICEABLE features of Vista Home Premium. I have home basic, and am getting a computer with premium tomorrow. I still fail to see what the hype is all about. It's prettier than XP but you better be ready to pay for the hardware.

vista BASIC

I want vista basic!!! I do not want my computer loaded down with a system that takes a gig just to turn on! Media center sucks don't want it! Not a movie making or photo journalist wanna be.
Want my computer to do what I want. Do not need it loaded down with garbage vista basic needs 512 memory to turn on. thats all I need to make me happy. Some of us want to put on our own software and not have to deal with bloated opp crap.

Vista Home Basic

I disagree with the premise that Home Basic is useless, since I believe that, while poorly executed from a marketing standpoint, until every manufacturer ships every PC with at least 2 GB of RAM, Vista Home Basic should be an option so that the computer is usable with 1 GB of RAM while still getting some of the benefits of Vista, such as the new firewall, UI theme, UAC and the ability to upgrade, hassle-free, at a later date, to name a few benefits present in Home Basic, none of which are present in XP.

The more consumer-friendly way to market Vista Home Basic, which still serves a purpose, though not as great a purpose as it did when RTM came out since more machines now come with 2 GB of RAM, would be to have two standards - "Vista capable" and "Vista Lite capable". Vista Home Basic should have been clearly identified as a lite version of Vista, and PCs should have been designated either of the aforementioned, lite or regular.

Microsoft's marketing department would not have been as happy with those terms, but their legal eagles would not be as busy as they are now as a result of the confusion, nor would Microsoft have lost all that good will by people who simply wanted a functional computer and were mislead by confusing nomenclature.

Incidentally, this blog post has a number of errors.
1. "It appears that Microsoft create Vista Home Basic " should probably read "created".
2. "Fewer and fewer PCs sold today can handle Aero". Huh? You mean they "cannot".

Again, I disagree with the premise that Vista Home Basic is pointless, though once 2 GB RAM is the absolute minimum supplied with a system, there would, then, be a legitimate case to discontinue Home Basic.

Microsoft made such a big

Microsoft made such a big mistake with Vista Home Basic that i think they should be forced to offer Basic users a free update to Premium. i am on basic now and i am quite dissapointed with the features it has, its like XP with a new GUI and a couple of extra features like enhanced security and readyboost.

You're clueless

Vista Basic has all the important updates, security, superfetch, readyboost, better multi-threading etc. etc. No, it doesn't have Aero Glass, but does have Aero Basic. If you want to know the difference, go to non-aero basic interace. It supports Desktop Windows Manager, just like the other versions. Best of all, it runs on the same hardware XP runs on.

Okay, it doesn't have the applets, who cares? Most people's computers come with their own software that do the same things. It's amazing to me that everyone gripes about the Bloat in Vista, but then say that Basic sucks, when it is exactly the stripped down version people keep saying they want.

If you ask me they should keep Basic, kill Ultimate, and add shadow copy and image backup to all the versions that remain.

Basic helped me save money

I for one was happy M$ had Vista Basic. I intended to put Linux on my laptop anyway (This was before Lenovo officially offered pre-loaded Linux.), and so I got Basic on my T61 which was actually $50 cheaper than the next lowest configuration (XP Pro or Vista Premium).

In fact the Lenovo salesperson also said the same! Hey, saving $50 was good enough for me, thanks to Vista Basic. :)

Of course, for those wanting Windows, it probably couldn't be worse, as my Vista Basic crashed three times in the first hour - at which time I installed Fedora on it!

Vista Home basic premium and so on

Why not make 1 vista, and when you install you can chose for Home use or Business or all, 1 price, easy to sell, easy to handle in shops, no sold out of that model because if you have 1 you have them all on stock, support would be easy to, you do not have to ask about version, and I think it would be cheaper in production to, then the price cheaper too.

Claus C

Microsoft Does make 1 DVD

Microsoft Does make 1 DVD with ALL versions available on it. The Key you use to install the OS determines your version. You are right that it should be available to the public. I don't know why it is. I am an MSDN Volume License subscriber, which is how I came to get a hold of the DVD.

Vista Basic

Well, I may be one of the very few users who actually find Vista Basic an improvement on XP.
The security seems better. The GUI is better (even though it's not Aero). I upgraded without any real problem. It runs all my current software. It recognises all my peripheral hardware. It seems stable and reliable. While it is not a vast improvement on XP, it has enough new features to make it a better buy on a new "low end" PC.

Legalized handcuffs

Given the on-going lawsuit, wouldn't any change to the Windows line-up be used against Microsoft? Seems like businesses and consumers are going to have to wait to get what they want until the suit has played out.