The long-awaited upgrade to Microsofts search engine will soon make its debut. ... The company is expected to demonstrate it at our D: All Things Digital conference next week.
Code-named Kumo, the search engine is a major effort by Microsoft (MSFT) to raise its hand to table stakes in the battle for search market share with Google (GOOG)something it desperately needs to do.
It appears likely to ... launch ... within the next week or two. ... Ballmer might show some of the features of the new Kumo service and potentially finally unveil Microsofts new brand. Then [Microsoft's Dr. Qi] Lu might announce that the service is actually live for anyone to use, a week later ... [at the] SMX Advanced search marketing conference.
I doubt Kumo will be the new name. After being used in testing, any thunder with that name is kind of gone. ... Bing.com resolves to a blank page, is registered to Microsoft and uses Microsofts name servers.
In the U.S., Google sites held 64.2 percent of the search market in April, a strong lead over Yahoo!, which holds 20.4 percent market share, and Microsoft, which follows with 8.2 percent, according to comScore Inc. data. The Ask Network held 3.8 percent and AOL held 3.4 percent.
Month to month, Google's market share gained a half percentage point, while Microsoft's share lost by .1 percentage points.
Lipstick on a pig, anyone? Microsoft does somethings well. Working with software developers, the Xbox 360, Surface. But unfortunately Search is just not an area Microsoft is getting it. To me, the idea behind Kumo seems completely unneeded.
Say it with me - relevancy. Not more, tired clever presentation of the same old data, but relevancy that has way to actually out do Google is what it will take for MS to have a prayer.
The company discussed the latest enhancements to its search technology at an early afternoon Chalk Talk event today, displaying a new way of delivering results thats both simpler and more complex than the old way.
[It] points toward Yahoos strategy of integrating data culled from multiple sources into results centering on web objects, clustering information around the likely intended result of a users query. Searches for athletes or musicians, for example, will deliver results with pictures, streaming music, or fantasy baseball stats, rather than 10 results in the familiar link-and-teaser model. The idea is to anticipate the users intent.
Its the Webs biggest straw man, and it keeps getting built up, torn down, then built up again. I speak of the idea that a startup is a potential Google killer.
Its usage consistently follows the same cycle: At first, pundits thoughtfully wonder if a promising new service might be a Google killer and then, once its clear its an unlikely scenario, they cockily explain why it wont come to pass. ...If anyone compares your Internet startup to Google, its time to panicits more of a curse than a compliment.