Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Laptop buyers: We don't want Windows machines

Microsoft may have a stranglehold on the PC market, but there are some worrying signs: At top online retailers the best-selling laptops are overwhelmingly Linux-based or Macs. And that could spell trouble for Microsoft down the road.

Here's one example. At the price-comparison site PriceGrabber, only five of top 15 most popular laptops are Windows-based. The top seller is a Linux-based Asus Eee PC. In fact, three versions of that Linux notebook are in the top 15 sellers. And in the top 15 sellers there are a total of seven --- yes, that's right seven -- different sizes and configurations of MacBooks. HP, Toshiba, and Sony are the only manufacturers of Windows-based laptops in the top 15.

This isn't only happening on just PriceGrabber. Over on Amazon, things are even worse for Windows laptops. The nine top best-selling laptops are either Asus Eee PC Notebooks running Linux or Macbooks. Of the top 15, only three are Windows-based, made by Toshib and HP.

Now, keep in mind that these numbers are quite skewed. Online retailers don't take into account direct sales like Dell, or corporate sales --- and those numbers are quite large. There's no doubt that when those numbers are taken into account, Windows-based laptops far outsell Linux and Mac machines.

Still, these numbers should scare Microsoft. It shows that Web-savvy consumers are turning away from Windows-based laptops. They tend to be influencers, so where they go, others will most likely follow.

You can make the argument that this trend has nothing to do with Microsoft's actions. Above all, these laptop buyers seem to be making their choices based on price, size, and overall design. Microsoft doesn't make the hardware, so you can argue that Microsoft isn't to blame for design, size, and price.

You certainly can make that argument, but you'd be wrong. Take a look at the buyers that Microsoft is losing. The Asus and MacBooks represent two different types. The Asus laptops appeal to those who want very light laptops, as well as bargain hunters and techies. Linux can run quite well without high-end hardware, so very light, inexpensive laptops can be built around it. In addition, manufacturers don't have to pay Microsoft for Windows, keeping the laptops cheap.

MacBooks represent a different end of the spectrum. They certainly aren't cheap, and generally cost more than their Windows-based counterparts. But they are beautifully designed, and because both OS and hardware come from the same vendor, don't have the same kind of hardware woes that affect Windows-based laptops.

For both types of buyers, Windows is at least part of the reason why buyers are flocking to Asus and the MacBook. Vista is a hardware hog, and so you simply can't design a workable, inexpensive, ultralight laptop that runs it. It requires higher-end processors and graphics cards, and a relatively capacious hard disk. So for those who want laptops that are both light and cheap, the Asus is the only way to go.

Those who are willing to pay, on the other hand, choose MacBooks because they feel Mac OS X is superior to Vista. Once again, then, Windows is to blame.

Microsoft can't compete on the low-and-cheap end because Windows has too many heavy requirements for it to be able to run on cheap, light hardware. It can certainly run on light hardware, but you have to pay through the nose for light. And it can run on cheap hardware as well, but then you'll be lugging around a laptop with too much weight.

As for the MacBook, the only way Microsoft can compete is with a better operating system than Vista.

Increasingly, people are buying laptops rather than desktops for their primary machines. Unless Microsoft can figure out a way with Windows 7 to compete at both the high and low ends, it may be in for trouble.

[Like this blog? Subscribe to the RSS feed here!]

What People Are Saying

Vista

I bought a new Sony laptop with Vista installed I have had so many problems with it I installed XP on the hard drive. Sony needs to provide more drivers the selection is terrible. I also installed Ubuntu on half the hard drive, it runs great, it found all the hardware and I was up and running without looking for drivers. My wife saw the problems I had with Vista and said no way do I want Vista. We just bought a Mac G4 online it runs better and faster than the "new" Vista laptop. The cash cow for Richmond is Office but with Open Office you get a great product free and for my use it has replaced MS Office. For the Mac I bought I-works and again for what my wife needs it covers everything and at less than $100 it is not priced too high, oh and that is for upto 5 computers.

Mac iWork

> For the Mac I bought I-works and
> again for what my wife needs it
> covers everything and at less than
> $100 it is not priced too high, oh
> and that is for upto 5 computers.

Maybe you didn't know this? OO.o 2.4.0 is also available for MacOS X in both Intel and PPC flavors. US English and several Euro languages are supported for the Mac:
http://download.openoffice.org/other.html

In addition, there is

In addition, there is NeoOffice: essentially OpenOffice with Mac O.S. X features and integration. More Mac-ey, less O.O. Windows-ey.

Apple v Ubuntu v Windows

I've had no experience with either Mac or Linux until this month (March 2008), when I installed Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon on a P4 2.6 based LCDPC from Cervo(?) and installed the latest iMAC with a 24" screen for a friend.

Ubuntu almost worked 100% out of the box, and I wish I could afford the $(NZ)2,795.00 for the iMAC.

I was an early adopter from 1989 until Vista appeared, but won't be going down that track at all. When I can afford the iMAC, I'M GONNA CHANGE!!! ( Most people I know who have their Windows based system to Macs have commented on gow good it is to be able to use the machine to work, rather than have to mess around trying to fix some small issue that appears every so often on Windows. My experience with my friend's iMAC has left me feeling a bit like a poor cousin. It was the most impressive computer experience I've had for a while.)

Ubuntu will stay on my wife's PC for the forseeable future. My third OS will be XP until it dies,gets buried, drowned, etc.

I will NOT change to Vista. Why should I have to buy a new PC just to run some piece of software that costs the earth, and requires a high-end PC.

I've fixed some issues on Vista machines - both laptops and desktop - and I wasn't impressed with the experience.

I'm afraid my Microsoft loyalty and experience will stop after XP ceases to be useful to me: unless they get their a-into-g and do something better than the "total increased cost OS experience".

Hooray for Microcenter

Just a couple months ago, I bought a great laptop. Under $700 and it runs Windows just fine. See, it's a Lenovo and it's still loaded with XP Pro. And just last night I bought a new server to replace my old one. This one for less than $800 and it runs Windows just fine - Windows XP Pro, that is. Thank the FSM that Microcenter is still listening to their customers and are selling XP machines - retail. These 2 nice machines that run all my current software just fine would be impossible to use with Vista. I'm putting my "Upgrade to Vista Business" disk that came with my new server in the trash.

Maybe with version 7, MS will re-discover the definition of an OPERATING SYSTEM and ship us something that doesn't require all that hardware just to boot. A real OS - kinda like the what you get with Linux. Something that loads on 200mb of hard drive and not 4gb.

Because Vista runs like a dog on laptops....

And just about all you can get now on a retail laptop is Vista. Vista requires a dedicated mid-high end GPU with GRAPHICS MEMORY, not these abortions of laptops that use integrated GPUs and use system memory or even the hybrids that have 128MB on a weak GPU and use anything they need more than 128MB from system RAM.

There are laptops out there that fit the bill but basically why would I shell out 3-5 grand for a laptop to run an inferior OS like Vista.

Microsoft had better get a desktop version of Server 2008 with Multimedia out the door or they are going lose more and more desktop space too.

Yes you can be right and say that MS is to blame

People that say that Microsft's dominance in the market has warped what a computer would otherwise be with out them would be correct. Microsoft is branding and marketing period. The author seems to say as much but half denies his own point.

However MS had better do something truly innovative and do it in house for once or they will make me very very happy.

Did you mean to say "very

Did you mean to say "very very UNhappy"?

Mac

My vote is for Mac..........I'm sick and tired of dealing with Microsoft

I wonder where the economy figures into this

Some will buy cheap machines from Best Buy where they can get an underpowered and slow piece of junk with Vista on it for $399. Meanwhile, MS pays the big box retailers not to stock alternatives. This in turn starts a cycle where the next time someone needs a new computer, they are going to go online to do it. And they are going to avoid MS and the big box store because the last purchase was just cheap garbage. Thank-you MS.
Your own monopolistic marketing tactics to sell junk are coming back to bite you in the butt. A $1200 Macbook
boots up in a tenth of the time it takes a $2000 Windows machine. A $400 Linux machine boots up in a tenth of the time it takes a $2000 Windows machine to do so. For
every MS machine sold today, 20% will never ever buy another tomorrow. Sooner or later, the crapware, bloatware and destruction caused by MS Updates and patches will drive customers to alternatives. It's happening now. In 10 years MS will be lucky to have 50% of the market and Bill the old man won't care because he's rich.

As the economy gets tighter, people are looking more for value. There is no value in an MS machine. Why waste your money in it?