Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

Linux can save us

In case you haven't noticed, the economy is collapsing.

You can't afford to drive anywhere, and, even if you could, you may not have a GM car to drive there for much longer. Some of you may be losing your houses, and the mortgage companies that gave you that mortgage in the first place? IndyMac went down late last week and now the question of the day is which major national bank will follow it down.

What does this have to do with Linux? Everything.

With both people and companies having to squeeze a nickel's worth of good out of every penny, how long do you think people will be paying Microsoft for its imperfect operating systems and office suites? Vista Business SP1 'upgrade' has a list price of $199.95. Office 2007 Professional is $329.95. That's $529.90, or as much as a new low-end PC. Or, I could go with Ubuntu Linux for zero money down. if I wanted big business support, I could buy SLED (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop) 10 SP 2 from Novell for $50. SLED, like any desktop Linux, includes OpenOffice 2.4 for free.

Which one would you buy when your IT budget is going to be cut to the bone?

Your job may also be at stake. Do you want to keep buying Windows when according to the SANS Institute's ISC (Internet Storm Center), an unprotected Windows system will last "less than five minutes" before being hacked? Five minutes!?

Of course, not all experts think Windows is that insecure. Why some security pros believe that a vanilla copy of Windows could make it as long as 16-hours. Isn't that reassuring?

You can prevent that from happening. All you have to do is to keep your patches up to date. To do that, of course, you'll need to hope that the patches themselves won't blow up; the patches actually work and that Microsoft won't make it impossible for you to download those patches in the first place.... again. But, other than that what do you have to worry about?

Oh wait, there is all that malware out there. Well, you can always buy anti-viral software. So, if we go with the cheapest, most basic anti-virus program from Symantec, Norton Antivirus 2008 for one user has a list price of $39.99 per year.

Let's add this up. I can pay $569.89 for the operating system and software for my PC or I can pay $50. Oh, and if I pay the big bucks, I have a system that won't last a day on the Internet unless I'm constantly on my guard and Microsoft doesn't foul up again.

Gosh, which one do you think is the better deal?

Yes, I could use open OpenOffice, or its corporate big brother IBM Symphony, on Windows as well. That would save some money, but I'm still running Windows with all its other up-front and on-going security costs.

It's time to give up our Microsoft habit. We used to be able to afford to pay the Microsoft tax. Those days are done.

The hard days ahead are the days when we need to make the most of what we have and that means Linux. If we, and our businesses, are to make it through the great depression of the 21st century, we must start moving to Linux today.

What People Are Saying

An incorrect analysis

For an average office worker who makes at least 30-40$/hr, a loss of even a few hours in trying to figure out how to apply a driver or how to install a program makes free expensive. Windows/ Office will still sell because it saves the companies these unproductive hours. Linux is fine for afterhours when I'm in the mood to be geeky, where I write my own drivers or go through long installation scripts, but for office, let me pass Linux, I've got work to do.

An incorrect comment

That comment that you will lose a few work hours to learn Linux, so it costs money, IS SO LAME. How many hours do you lose doing full system scans for viruses/spyware/trojan, how many hours will you lose to learn vista and how many hours due to crashes and hdd formats and reinstalls??
Linux will also give A LOT OF ADDED VALUE to any company, as employees will become more IT advanced everyday.

Get Real...

You're justification is not the advantages of Linux, but rather the price? Are you not an IT professional with a degree and a salary? What's your problem?

If you are so underpaid that you can't afford the difference, then perhaps it's time that you strengthen your skills in Microsoft software and make some real money, unless you're not up to the intellectual challenge...

Linux is so... second-rate...

Pretty much...

Pretty much every time when a manager goes shopping for software, hardware, desks or whatever *for his staff* then its the price that counts - if he can shave $5 off per unit by going with a smaller screen and he doesn't think anyone *needs* a bigger screen (after all, he surfs for pr0... I mean does his business critical computing on a 800x600 display, and it doesn't hurt him none) when he will go for the cheaper option, and pride himself on getting "value for money" and "optimizing his budget" - so price is a primary driver when selling the scheme to management.

of course, the increased stability, larger share of resources available, improved security and control, inherent secure remote administration etc etc etc are "nice" from an IT professionals point of view, but from a manager's point of view that comes under the heading of "makes life easier for the IT Staff" or worse yet, "can reduce the number of IT staff" - where the former isn't a large motivator and the latter is one to be avoided unless you *like* innovating yourself out of a job... At least microsoft platforms give job security and the illusion of active use of skills (until they replace you with a school leaver with no practical experience but a newly minted MCSE, of course)

Linux oeprating system

Hi
I am a software engineer working in a multinational company and I am also using Linux operating system and I had not face any problem in that. I also hear lot of people having problems with Linux operating system. I thought Linux operating system user friendly and ultimate software.
================================================

Danny
http://orkut.com - http://orkut.com

Really

Redally, I have to pay for a Vista fix, by way of Vista SP1? This just beggers belief!!

Why should I have to pay for something that has problems. If there were no problems then why does SP1 have to be released? Or is the fix andother Windows 98SE trick, adda feature and sell it for big bucks?

If my car has a brake problem in warranty it is fixed free of charge. Even with recalls many years later. Why should software be any different? Anything you buy has a warranty, it has any sort of problem, software related or hardware related it is fixed free of charge. Again I ask why should Microsoft be any different?

Everyone who has a registered copy of Vista should be given all service packs free of charge as a warranty issue. Not to do so, in my view, means the product was sold with no warranty. I think in a number of countries that is illegal.

I guess at the end of the day who cares about the client!

grs

Wha...?

No, no, not really. Are you seriously asking this question? Did you Google it before you posted on a public comment board? You don't have to pay for SP1. You misunderstood what he was saying. The author was saying you can buy Vista, and it now includes SP1 when you buy it new.

Microsoft never charged for service packs (as far as I know). This was at least true with Win 2000, XP, Office 2000/2003, etc. All free downloads from the MS website. And how did this ignorant comment get such a high positive rating? I thought people who read this web site new something about computers and software.

Linux and energy effciency

I just built a Linux computer for home used. The mother board, processor, power supply unit, hard drive were all chosen for energy efficiency but still be responsive and able to do everything I wanted to do. People are concern about saving power.Linux which runs on more hardware than any other operating system is very good at saving energy as well as money. I agree with the author. Yes hard times can be good for Linux.

Save Energy save the world. No kidding.

First a disclaimer. I've looked at the available research materials. There is little or no proof that Global Warming is true. Before you try to argue with me take a look at the data.

Linux can reduce power consumption saving millions of barrels of oil. SAVING THE US.

Now I've been looking for an energy efficient laptop for several years. I've alway known, if they wanted to, the manufacturers could come up with a much lighter and cheaper laptops with much longer battery life. Linux can help also.

Lets face it the Microsoft's empire is based on ever fancier graphical desktops. Faster and faster processors. Bigger and more bloated programs. You need a faster computer just to run the program. The hardware companies empires are based on faster and faster computers to replace the ones that will no longer support the current Microsoft software.

I supported business applications in DOS 15 to 20 years ago. You know spread sheets. Word processor. Accounting software. etc. etc. They got the job done. Quite frankly none of the modern versions of these programs run all that much faster on modern processors and Microsoft's latest. Run those older programs in DOS today and experience much faster speeds.

What I'm thinking of is a Linux based laptop. Optimized for speed, energy savings and costs.

To reduce initial costs. Standardize on some parts, Display, CD-rom, battery, etc., increase reliability and save on mass production.

Manufactures should work with Intel/AMD to implement new energy saving features. Optimizing Linux OS for specific Laptops should allow for much longer battery life.

Existing battery technologies would allow for Linux laptops that could run for up to 8 to 12 hours without charging. What could they do with the new technologies.

The real kicker would be the OS and programs. Lightweight Desktop and programs that were optimized and smaller would lead to large savings. Smaller efficient GUI programs would be more like those older now extremely fast DOS programs than Microsoft's bloated VISTA behemoth. Or Microsoft equally bloated Office.

Note: Open Document Format also would seem to save time. It obvious that something you can't easily share slows you down. Something that 10 years from now you can't open at all stops you!

Hey, you've got two computers. Both working on the same documents on the network server.

1. A Linux computer that runs twelve hours on (battery A) for example.

2. A Microsoft computer that runs four hours on the same (battery A).

Which is saving energy.

Linux is using 1/3 the energy. Saving us from Global Warming and other energy woes...

1. A Linux computer that

1. A Linux computer that runs twelve hours on (battery A) for example.
2. A Microsoft computer that runs four hours on the same (battery A).

What do you win when you lie? And another question to other linux advocates. What do you do when someone is lying to support your cause?