Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Macs, Windows 7, and Linux

As I write this, the new Mac news is coming out and Microsoft just decided to back down from limiting Windows 7 Starter Edition to no more than three applications. So, why do I think you may want to buy a Linux desktop instead? Easy: Price.

The Macbook still starts at $999. The new 13.3" display. MacBook Pros starts at $1,199. That's great! If you've got that kind of money to spend…

Let me be the first to say that you do get what you pay for with a Mac. I like them a lot and I own three myself. But, they aren't cheap and for me they're business expenses so at the end of the tax year they don't cost me as much as they do most people.

If you've got the money, and you can live with Apple's proprietary lock-down approach, go ahead and get a Mac. But, if you can't afford one, and you want some freedom in your software choices, look elsewhere.

Microsoft, in its recent TV ads, wants you to look at them for the low-cost alternative. Please. Can anyone who's ever put up with misery that is Vista feel anything but sorry for someone who'd buy a Windows laptop today?

Windows continues, as always, to be an insecure mess that requires constant fixes to say safe and functional. And, of course, you need to add other security software to it to keep it working for you and not for a Nigerian spammer.

Given a choice between a Mac and Windows, I know which one I'll buy. The Mac may cost me more at first, but in the long run I'll save money with it.

You can, of course, wait for Windows 7, which is better than Vista, but it's not going to be cheap either. But, let's say in today's hard times all you can afford is a netbook? What then?

Well, you're out of luck. Let's see what Brandon LeBlanc, Microsoft's Windows Communications Manager himself had to say about Windows 7 Starter Edition. It won't come with:

*Aero Glass, meaning you can only use the "Windows Basic" or other opaque themes. It also means you do not get Taskbar Previews or Aero Peek.

* Personalization features for changing desktop backgrounds, window colors, or sound schemes.

* The ability to switch between users without having to log off.

* Multi-monitor support.

* DVD playback.

* Windows Media Center for watching recorded TV or other media.

* Remote Media Streaming for streaming your music, videos, and recorded TV from your home computer.

* Domain support for business customers.

* XP Mode for those that want the ability to run older Windows XP programs on Windows 7.

Now my compadre, Preston Gralla, thinks that those are, "For netbooks… fairly minor features." I disagree.

You see, I can get those kinds of features on any modern Linux distribution on a netbook. In addition, Microsoft won't let you get a better version of Windows on a netbook. If it has a big screen, more than a gigabyte of RAM, etc. you're stuck with Windows 7 Starter Edition. Linux says, to borrow an old ad phrase, "Have it your way."

And, I must add, have it your way at a price almost anyone can afford. The new Linux netbooks will crowd the $100 price barrier. And, as Dell just showed with its Inspiron 15n and Ubuntu Linux you can have a full-powered Linux laptop for $299.

Or, as some of my readers have pointed out, you can jazz it up and still be under $500. "I bumped it up to a core 2 duo 2.0GHz processor and 4GB RAM for $459. Now that's a pretty sweet laptop for under $500."

Exactly.

And that's why, if you want to save money and still have a great computer, you'll want to consider Linux. For the price, you simply can't beat it.

What People Are Saying

Move back to Linux on netbooks? A vain hope.

I have a Asus Linux netbook myself and it's been very useable since I got rid of the Xandros/Asus kludge and replaced it with Eeebuntu. But I'm not kidding myself that many other people are prepared to give Linux netbooks the time of day any more. They'll stay with Windows, even if it has to be stripped-down Windows 7.

My hunch on this was bolstered by a trip last week to Seoul, Korea, where I visited the enormous Yongsan electronics market, which is reputed to be bigger than the Tokyo and Hong Kong markets combined. There were probably thousands of laptops running in the dozens of electronics shops.

100 percent of those laptops were running Windows. That includes the netbooks, which were very numerous - at a guess they were between 30-40% of the laptops on show.

Essentially, Linux has totally lost momentum in the netbook market - in Asia at least. From what I read, it's the same elsewhere in the world. Frankly, I can't see Linux rising from the ashes - even if it deserves to.

Linux had a great opportunity in netbooks, being first off the blocks. It's blown that opportunity, big-time.

Vain Hope

I see around 30% of netbooks being sold in Thailand with Linux preinstalled, and I saw a few on recent trips to Malaysia also. This is Asia.

Are you, perchance, one of those dudes employed by Microsoft to post FUD in Forums?

South korea is a bit special

South korea is a bit special as rather then wait for SSL, they introduced a national security solution for online banking and similar. And guess what, its based on activex.

So basically, if you want to do any kind of online banking there, you need IE, and that means windows...

Windows 7 is the most impressive OS so far

Owning a macbook pro (last gen) an iphone and a windows 7 laptop, I actually feel sorry for anyone who thinks of going the Apple way. ALL THAT APPLE CAN DO IS SHOW YOU LOTS OF EYE CANDIES. THAT'S IT. Absolutely nothing useful, well thought, let alone smart. I'm not saying MS is way much better, but with Windows 7, after seeing it perform, let me tell you that apple can't reach MS ankle with leopard. Tons and tons and tons of retarded functionalities in both leopard and iphone os. I have to admint that I love the iphone, I actually love the idea. If only a german company could have made it....if only.

What?

Since when do you "get what you pay for" with a Mac? They're obviously overpriced for the hardware you get and have very limited options for software and upgrades. What, exactly, is the price for style and cliquishness? Also, as a current article by Preston Gralla on this site articulates, Macs have their security vulnerabilities too.

When I see someone with a Mac, I see a fool.

What???

lol -- spoken like someone who's not used a Mac running OS X! "overpriced hardware" -- that falls in line with Windows-capable hardware pricing. "limited... software", on a UNIX-based system with more open-source software on it out of the box than a typical Windows system has proprietary software! (e.g., Apache, PHP, Perl, Ruby, X-Windows, SSH, gcc, VNC, NFS, ... need I go on? Because I certainly can -- all this and more is on a standard OS X install!)

Ignorant people make me laugh...

Irelevant software

In the business market, MS keeps a Windows dominance because of inertia -- end user training and support, and the cost of porting custom applications.

In the consumer market, MS will keep its dominance as slong as Intuit refuses to port Quicken and TurboTax to Linux. (Don't flame me about 'comparable' software. I don't like Intuit either, and don't use their software, but they anchor MS and raise the barriers to exit from Windows.)

The number of people who use the software you mention -- or even know what they do -- is too smal to move the market around.

Changing the name of Netbooks

Microsoft really hates Netbooks. The company want's to change the name of 'Netbooks' to 'low cost small notebook PCs'. Why? Because 'Netbooks' are notebooks designed primarily for accessing the Internet, and they do such a good job at it that Microsoft can't fault them. To change them to a 'small notebook PC' means that Microsoft can attack the fact that they don't offer all of the other applications most people want from a PC/laptop.

MS hates Netbooks

Sure - MS must destroy the netbook concept. Fast flash (silent running) albeit with small storage space, a mobile processor - halfway between a mobile phone and a PC - and a screen not over 10"

If Netbooks are to stay in this domain, then Windows just isn't any use. Linux is coming up with solutions - the Ubuntu interface (maximumise for windows, no window borders required..) is one example.

Microsoft are incapable of innovation, they simply cannot compete in this area. They are getting very very scared by the Android mobile platform. Symbian and Windows always sucked on mobiles, Android will be like using an iPhone on acid.

Who's going to do video editing on a netbook? They're for portable computing. For people who realise that a Laptop is a pretty expensive toy, and when they think about what they really use it for they think it's just not worth paying that much.

Netbooks aren't for doing computing at home - they are a mobile device for people who already have a desktop at home.

yes, more Microsoft newspeak

"...Microsoft can attack the fact that they [netbooks] don't offer all of the other applications most people want from a PC/laptop."

It's really just Microsoft's version of the netbook that can't offer all of the other applications people want from a PC/laptop. A netbook running linux will support the productivity software included a typical desktop distro.