Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Dan Tynan's picture
Dan Tynan

Culture Crash

Macworld is dead; is CES next?

OK, technically Macworld Expo isn't dead; it's still happening next January 5 to 9 in San Francisco. And Apple will still be there -- but sans Steve Jobs.

The patron saint of Cupertino has confirmed he will not be giving the keynote address at this year's show for the first time since The Second Coming (that is, Jobs regaining the CEO job in 1997). And next year Apple Inc. won't be there at all.

(Filling in for Jobs: Apple veep Phil Schiller, who must feel a little like the guy who replaced Michael Jordan for the Chicago Bulls.)

Why? Your guess is as good as those of the 3 million other bloggers who are madly speculating about this right now. As for me, I'm leaning toward Infoworld's Robert X. Cringely, who suspects a spat between Apple and Macworld's sponsor, IDG World Expo, is to blame.

(Full disclosure: IDG World Expo's parent company, International Data Group, publishes Computerworld, Infoworld, PC World, and nearly every other tech magazine with the word "World' in the title.)

Every year, the tech journos I knew would grumble about having to cover both the Jobs keynote at Macworld in SF and the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, which have often been scheduled for the same week (as they are this year). Now they don't have that problem.

And before long they may not have to worry about CES either.

Oh sure. There will still be enormous crowds in Vegas when the show starts on January 8. Vendors will go to extremes to get peoples' attention. The parties will be excessive, the cab lines insane.

But it will be quieter than it has been in the past. And as for the future, well, remember COMDEX? That show went from over 150,000 attendees to dead in less than three years. My crystal ball tells me CES is on a similar track.

I did an informal poll of folks I know who typically attend CES and a lot of them are sitting it out this year (including yours truly). Part of it is the down economy and the high costs of the show. Part of it is a feeling that these enormous shows have outlived their usefulness. They're fine if you're in the electronics biz and want to schmooze with suppliers and distributors, but as a source of actual product news, CES hasn't been relevant for a coon's age.

PR maven and blackbelt trendspotter Richard Laermer thinks CES is already pushing up daisies:

It was dead last year. People go there flogging products that are vaporware and we're the former attendees who know hype when we smell it. The truth is: the world moves too quickly for show and tell now. Anything you got - show me, don't tell me about it.

On the other hand, colleague and Computerworld contributor Becky Waring counters:

No way... THE best show of the year where you can see everything/everyone. Yes, it's huge and hard to get around but still essential. Where else can you see all this stuff, pray tell?

Personally, my money's on Laermer. Blogging, social networking, and smaller more focused shows like Demo and All Things D are where the news actually happens. Macworld and CES are like artifacts of a bygone era -- three ring circuses in the age of streaming media.

What do you think -- are trade shows dying? Weigh in below or email me: dan (at) dantynan (dot) com.

When not not attending trade shows, Dan Tynan tends to tend his blogs, Culture Crash and Tynan on Tech.

 

Related news and opinion

What People Are Saying

Trade shows started dying

Trade shows started dying off a long time ago. All the small regional ones went away years ago, it's just now spreading to the big ones. I don't expect them to survive too many more years. They just don't offer what people need. The Internet is more useful than a trade show.

Steve unplugged the life support

After reading the press release from MacWorld's pr bot I had a flashback to Enron's Ken Lay encouraging employees to buy the stock a couple of weeks before the house of cards collapsed. A patient doesn't usually die the moment their breathing machine in unplugged, but make no mistake, Steve just walked in and kicked MacWorld's plug out of the wall. At his point they are reduced to trying to convince people the MacWorld BSOD is a feature not a bug.

and now a word from the Macworld Expo PR department...

(this just arrived in my inbox - dt)

Just curious how you came to the conclusion that Macworld is dead after this year? Can you substantiate that claim? Weโ€™re quite unaware of that to be honest. In fact, weโ€™re looking at producing a great show this year, as well as in the years to come. Please educate yourself with the following official statement from Paul Kent, our Vice president and General Manager for Macworld Conference & Expo:

"While we are obviously disappointed by Appleโ€™s decision not to participate in Macworld 2010, we are on track for a terrific show this year, with strong attendance numbers and nearly 500 exhibitors showcasing their products at the January event. Macworld Conference & Expo has thrived for 25 years due to the strong support of tens of thousands of members of the Mac community worldwide who use Macworld as way to find great products, partake in professional development training, and cultivate their personal and professional networks. We are committed to continuing to serve their interests at Moscone Center, January 4 โ€“ 8, 2010. Future events will continue to provide quality education, dynamic product viewing and will additionally focus on the amazing ways people are putting Apple products to work across all endeavors, from desktops to iPhones to games to music. We look forward to many more successful years of Macworld to come."

I would ask that you update your inaccurate and unsubstantiated story.

Regards,

Charlotte A. McCormack
Public Relations Manager
IDG World Expo

MacWorld will live another 1 or 2 years....

With Steve Jobs gone the press is gone and so are some of the very hardcore Apple Zealots.

With Apple entirely gone there go some more of the lesser Zealots. At this stage there is very little difference between the CES and MacWorld since the root draw (Apple & Steve Jobs) will not be there.

The prediction of the CES demise may be a bit mature since the vendors that display their new products at both shows will (IMHO) go with CES since their will be a more diverse vendor and audience base there.

I actually think that the move by Apple could extend the life of the CES, by it's slow collapse.

I wonder how many thumbs

I wonder how many thumbs down that comment will receive. For anyone who's not a Mac zealot the driving force to even think about Mac world is what could Apple be releasing this year?

With Apple gone it's pretty much a waste of time to type anym...

CES is strong

Now more than, industry tradeshows like CES are the best way to generate news business, network with partners and make deals. The average CES attendee has 12 meetings, with the who's who of the global tech industry. 300 new exhibitors are joining a total of 2700 exhibitors at the upcoming 2009 Int'l CES. Preregistration is strong and this show is shaping up to be the must- attend event of the year for the tech industry.

I somewhat agree with Tara....

Face to Face personal networking is still the best means of REALLY knowing the vendor, their product roadmaps, and their personality (and beleive me the latter is important).

One caviat to the above statement is that one has to do a lot of walking and sometimes getting "tagged" by a vendor they are NOT interested in and in this day and age of Internet communications ALL of these conferences are becoming marginalized.

thanks tara

for those of you who don't know tara, she's a senior PR person for the consumer electronics association, the folks who put on CES.

cheers,

dt

Not so fast there, Dan

One point you didn't distinguish is that Macworld is a CONSUMER show, selling lots of product on the show floor, whereas CES specifically excludes the public and sells nothing. Macworld will die because with no Apple, other big vendors will drop out too, and there will no longer be any excitement to attract the public.

But CES is for store buyers and other pros (journalists a surprisingly small part of that) to get their hands on the goods and see what's coming down the pike. Whether it remains a news springboard is a different question and not essential to the show's relevance. For me, being able to meet these people once a year and maintain relationships is especially important since I'm freelance and not getting in-house demos, as PC World editors do.

Comdex was completely different still... attracting mostly IT people and techies. The exhibitors were all siphoned off by more relevant smaller shows, such as CTIA, Interop, E3, Infocomm, PMA, Siggraph, and even CES and NAB, which kept adding computer stuff as media/computing converged.

I go to all of these pretty regularly, and have not missed a Macworld, whether SF, Boston or NYC, since the first in 1985.

Just saying there's loads more to the story than you talk about, and it's not so simple.

thanks becky

I have to respectfully disagree with you on a few things. I went to my first Comdex in the late 1980s and my first CES in the mid 1990s. They were different shows back then, but gradually Comdex kind of blended into CES. Over the last few years I've been hard pressed to see much difference between the old Comdex and the current CES, save that the gadgets at CES are less nerdy. I'm not alone in this.

Last year I had a distinct 'jumped the shark' sensation at CES (I'm also not alone in that.) It felt similar to how Comdex felt in 1999. A number of the vendors I talked to last year said they probably wouldn't return. And I've certainly gotten much less pre-show email this year than last year. I haven't seen any figures released by the CEA on show registrations, but I'd be highly surprised if the numbers weren't down.

cheers,

Dan Tynan
Tynan on Tech
dantynan.com