Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Microsoft iPhone app ships broken and proprietary. Expectations met.

Microsoft certainly isn't making it difficult for its detractors to criticize their foray into iPhone Apps.  The company's first product, which shipped this weekend and is dubbed Seadragon Mobile, is fundamentally broken – or so they say in the iTunes description and on the company's website.

A very important feature – the ability to browse Photosynth libraries – doesn't work:

The 'Browse Photosynth' functionality broke right after we submitted the app to the AppStore. Hopefully we'll get a new version with this fixed submitted to Apple in the next few days. Photosynth search and adding a user to view their Synths still works. Sorry!

There is a fix if you want to be able to use this functionality.  I'd try it except I don't want to waste 5 minutes entering in a huge URL that I'll probably mess up. Supposedly the app will be updated in a week.

All of that being said, it is a pretty cool app for what it does, and that is zooming in on incredibly large image files over and over again.  And it is pretty quick.  I'd say about on par with zooming in on a Google Map.  Speaking of Maps, it does GPS functionality on map overlays which mimicks the Google Earth/Maps functionality somewhat. 

Of the other examples given, I am a huge fan of the Library of Congress maps and documents.  Any history buff will enjoy having these available on their iPhone.

The application itself is a pretty big event for the two companies.  Microsoft Live Labs seems to have some admiration for Apple's iPhone.  Alex Daley, group product manager for Microsoft Live Labs, gave the iPhone high praise:

"The iPhone is the most widely distributed phone with a [graphics processing unit]. Most phones out today don’t have accelerated graphics in them. The iPhone does and so it enabled us to do something that has been previously difficult to do. I couldn’t just pick up a BlackBerry or a Nokia off the shelf and build Seadragon for it without GPU support."

The thing that I don't like about Seadragon and Photosynth in general is the way that Microsoft uses a proprietary file format for its images and basically locks any interoperability with other companies' products.

If I upload my pictures, I can never have them back in a format of my choice.  If I want to look at them, I need the Photosynth browser (unless I misunderstand the way this application works).  It also doesn't work on my Mac.  So the barrier for me to enter this ecosystem fully is too high. 

But I guess this is just Microsoft being Microsoft.

 

What People Are Saying

It is working really good

It is working really good for me, and as proprietary applications, software and hardware Apple got them all in its grip. I still like OS that do not need a user manuals to download an application (I'm talking about Linux) One day might be good but I for now I love my Mac, but you have to give some credit to Microsoft for trying and doing a good job.

Proprietary does not sound

Proprietary does not sound good when you are talking about Apple or iPhone Apps where they (Apple) have their hands deeper in the mud.
When it comes to proprietary applications, software and hardware Apple fails worse than Microsoft.

Microsoft being

Microsoft being Microsoft?
How about this?

"Apple ships iPhone broken and proprietary. Expectations met."

Apple always wanted to be a monopoly - that's why they locked everything - from Mac hardware production, to the iPod and iPhone.

Where's you're complaint about Apple taking a 30% cut of the price of iPhone apps? Imagine if Microsoft had an "AppStore" for Windows and did that! You are a total hypocrite.

Microsoft being......uh, what is that again?

hhhmmmm....must be a microsoft employee. I can say that because I used to work there. Drink some more koolaid from the Redmond keg why don't ya. You evidently didn't listen as Ballmer outlined the strategy for the next 5 years....to become an advertising company. Talk about providing a service no one wants. I wonder why so many msft employees walk around campus with iphones and a macbook. I wonder.

Microsoft Employee

These boards are teeming with folks who take a paycheck (indirectly) from Microsoft to do "ground level" advertising. The way it works is this: you and I read these posts by people who go by anonymous handles and who tend to have just signed in the same day as the submission of their post. Please don't argue with them; their job is to give the impression that "real people" love Microsoft, don't mind paying premium prices for buggy and poorly prepared software and hardware, etc.

If there are really people out there who love downloading bug fixes, security patches, OS updates, application repairs, trojan horse spyware and viruses - more power to them.

My iPod didn't crash tonight. My iPhone worked properly out of the Box. My Leopard OS is tight and in 12 years I've never contracted a virus on my Mac. And I don't own or use anti-virus software. Suckers.

Apple takes 30% for server

Apple takes 30% for server and distribution costs. You have no point, because it is completely justified. All the developer has to do is upload their app, and let the good times roll.

Good troll, though.

Disagree

There is a distinct difference between "trying to monopolize the market" and "making products that are whole and complete (read: hardware AND software)". There's also a huge difference between being a monopoly and using your share to kill off competitors.

This doesn't mean Apple doesn't make dumb decisions; they do. But this incident here reeks of typical MS.

Microsoft still doesn't get it

I initially viewed this application as a positive sign that Microsoft might finally be starting to embrace change and may now be starting to build innovative/quality software that people on any platform would want to buy/use.

Then I read this in the article:

"Microsoft uses a proprietary file format for its images and basically locks any interoperability with other companies' products."

This just demonstrates again that Microsoft still doesn't get it.

It's just JPEG.

The images are just JPEG, nothing proprietary about that.

There's some XML-like wrappers which tell the viewer which JPEG images to load at which resolution levels. It's documented, not sure if one would call that proprietary. There's at least one third-party Python tool to build these.

The viewer puts these together with a UI which automatically grabs images at the right resolution and zooms up/down nicely to give the illusion of a single image. Not exactly revolutionary, but a nice touch.

Let me get this straight...

Microsoft wrote a program to...zoom in on images?

Haha...no wonder windows is failing. And the fact that Mac & Microsoft are loving their conglomeration over...zooming in on images...is more than hilarious.

Linux will take over all computers some day - not because its better, or because its free. But because linux users don't waste time building a seperate resource hog to zoom in on images. Instead - its streamlined into other apps that are actually usefull.