Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Microsoft: We're targeting all Vista activation hacks

If you've been using one of two common hacks to run Windows Vista without going through activation, Microsoft has you in its cross-hairs. It's rolling out patches, through Vista SP1 and Windows Update, that will recognize those hacks on your PC. That's the bad news. The good news is that the much-reviled Windows Geniune Advantage continues to get weaker, as I'll show you in a series of screenshots.

Microsoft, in its Windows Genuine Advantage blog, said yesterday that "in SP1 we will disable two of the most common exploits to our product activation technology. This means that users who have the exploits loaded on their systems will find those exploits disabled by SP1, and they will be asked to activate their copy of Windows Vista."

The company will also roll out a patch, via Windows Updates, that will do the same thing. There are two hacks involved, the OEM BIOS and Grace Timer exploits. In the OEM BIOS hack, Vista is tricked into thinking it's an OEM version. In the Grace Timer hack, Registry changes are made that tells Vista not to check for activation until a very distant time in the future.

When SP1 or the new patch finds one of those hacks, it displays the following screenshot:

Note the scary-sounding wording here --- it claims that you need to "repair Windows," as if Vista is damaged in some way. Of course, that's not the case; the operating system merely has one of the two activation hacks on it.

If you want to turn off one of the hacks, click the link on the screen, and you'll be sent to a Web page telling you how to do it. You'll then have to activate Vista.

It's hard to imagine anyone actually clicking the link to find out how to deactivate the hack --- after all, they hacked Vista in the first place. But Microsoft can wish, can't it?

Microsoft won't actually deactivate either of the hacks on its own. It's leaving it up to you to do that, although in the future, the company says that it will have a scheme that will deactivate them.

As I've written about previously, SP1 also does away with the dreaded Kill Switch that would in essence make Vista unusable unless you activate your copy of Windows. With SP1, you'll get the following notice if you don't activate Vista after a certain grace period.

The screen vamooses after 15 seconds if you don't activate Vista. If you don't activate after you see the screen, when you log into Vista, here's what happens according to the WGA blog:

The background wallpaper color will be set to black. This setting will be confirmed and reset every hour meaning that a user can change the wallpaper to a favorite image but each hour after being logged in, the system will reset the desktop background to black. When that happens, a system tray balloon notification will advise the customer to activate their copy of Windows.

Here's a screenshot of that balloon notification:

This is mildly annoying, but not as bad as deactivating Windows, which in essence used to happen under Vista. So at least Microsoft is moving in the right direction. Of course, the real answer is to do away with WGA completely.

What People Are Saying

Still a BIG slap to hearing impaired users

It started with XP, and Vista makes it worse... Every time you're forced to use phone activation, & you can't use the phone system because YOU CAN"T HEAR, it's a kick in the groin by whichever bigots at MS came up with this BS!

vista is too hard to pirate

I think that Vista failed because it was too hard to pirate. Most computer purchases are controlled by guys like me who have 6 computers in their house. We either work in companies as IT techs or we work independently.

I bought a new computer in anticipation of Vista. Actually, I bought the parts and assembled, from the motherboard to the cpu to the power supply etc. It did not include a license and I never intended to buy one.

I kept waiting for a decent vista activation hack to come out. Grace time and activation hack both seemed a bit dodgy to me. Customers started asking me what I thought about Vista. I told them I didn't have it.

A recent notebook purchase gave me a legal copy of Windows Vista Home Premium. It ran slow on a dual-core cpu with 2gb of ram. I tried everything to optimize it. After 2 weeks, I re-formatted with xp pro.

even with the reduced steps they take, vista anti-piracy features killed the product more than its suckiness.

My guess is that the market will skip vista and wait for windows 7. That better have no copy protection at all. Otherwise, I'm going to be even more negative about it.

All my customers would have legit licenses of Vista right now if it were not so hard for me to use Vista without a license.

If it weren't for a few apps like photoshop and tvunetworks I would have switched to Ubuntu by now. I've already switched to openoffice.org so that I am less dependent on MS and will be ready to switch to linux as soon as decent photoshop and tvunetworks client support are available.

Are you for real? Maybe all

Are you for real? Maybe all software makers should give their software away free, heck do away with licensing altogether. Do you allow your customer to choose whether they pay you or not?

Buy yourself a MSDN or Technet subscription and you can run copies of all MS software..

Too hard to pirate

I understand that point very well. I have had same thoughts my self too..
I also have thought that MS could prevent pirate versions if they would but this is the reason why they want to keep it in certain level -not impossible.

It's called promotion. I also suspect that "illegal" prebeta versions of 7 leaked out on purpose.
Just to get more people involved and hooked.

Seeing the writing on the wall

MS is seeing the light. They got where they are largely by means of piracy. The vast majority of Windows sales are via new systems. Letting people "steal" their OS's over the years for upgardes and reinstalls is what has made them the overwhelming leader in desktop systems. It may have technically been good for the bottom line to make life hell on the pirates, but it's better for them in the long run to let them get away with running and profligating Windows to others. Otherwise, the masses might give Linux a try and see how far it's come since the old days.

Eventually, look for only the lightest nags to activate.

You never have to activate

You never have to activate Ubuntu, SUSE, (name any other flavor of Linux you like).