Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


IT Blogwatch's picture
IT Blogwatch

A Daily Digest of IT Blogs from Richi Jennings

Mythbuster Adam Savage fights $11,000 AT&T bill with Twitter army

Mythbuster Adam Savage just got socked with an enormous AT&T (T) bill: $11,000 for roaming in Canada. In IT Blogwatch, bloggers blog their disgust for AT&T and wonder what might have happened if Savage wasn't famous.

By Richi Jennings -- your humble blogwatcher -- who  selected these bloggy morsels for your enjoyment. Not to mention muffins...

Adam "@donttrythis" Savage tweets his disgust at AT&T:

AT&T is attempting to charge me 11k for a few hours of web surfing in Canada ... they've turned off my phone until I pay. ... They're claiming I uploaded/downloaded 9 million kilobytes (9 gigs) while in Canada. Frakking impossible.
...
There's movement! Apparently I'll be getting a call soon ... Just got off the phone with AT&T and they've taken care of everything to my great satisfaction. ... AT&T guy on the phone with me:" apparently you've got enough Twitter followers to get our attention." me: "50,000". Him: "wow" ... [but]  it shouldn't just work for me. The data carriers MUST stop thinking in kilobytes and start thinking in customers.more


Kim LaCapria wonders:

Adam Savage has invoked the wrath of 50,000 Twitter followers in the general direction of telecommunications giant AT&T due to a $11,000 phone bill incurred while Savage was in Canada. Savage says he surfed the web on a mobile modem for “a few hours,” inadvertently cha-chinging up a bill that could keep any sane person in hookers and blow for at least a month.
...
Savage soon updated that AT&T was quick to quash the spurious charges after the fast and furious backlash. ... But would any of us have received the same quick and painless resolution?more


Pete Cashmore has a similar idea:

Normally those suffering the extortionate roaming fees charged by the carriers suffer in silence, or go through the endless phone systems to try and reach a more modest sum. But Savage has more than 50,000 Twitter followers, many of whom appear equally disgruntled about high roaming fees. His message has spread so fast that AT&T is now the second most discussed topic on Twitter, second only to Michael Jackson.
...
Best of luck if you end up in the same predicament and don’t have a Twitter army behind you.more


Jason Kincaid does the math:

What’s worse, the customer service rep Savage was dealing with was apparently a bit loose with their decimal points, telling Savage that “data is charged at .015 cents, or a penny and a half, per kb”. Read that again — there’s a couple orders of magnitude difference there.
...
It’s clear that AT&T needs to work on letting its customers know when they’re spending exorbitant amounts of money on data charges. An AT&T spokesman says that any phone taken abroad that begins racking up excessive charges will automatically receive an SMS alert, [and] that it often Emails the account on record and sometimes calls the account.more


But Karl Bode's seen it all before:

It's been a few months since the last time a mobile broadband user received a roaming bandwidth bill that required a second mortgage, so we were clearly overdue ... $11,000 [is] actually low compared to other stories. ... This endless stream of stories about insane bills is only going to get worse as carriers start offering subsidized netbooks with 3G connections to consumers unfamiliar with caps and overages (or even what a gigabyte is).
...
Clearly there's a disconnect happening somewhere in the customer education and alert process that needs fixing. ... Ultimately, carriers might want to do something about helping consumers through this process before an Attorney General in a state with tough consumer protection laws picks this up as his or her pet project.more


So what's your take?
Get involved: leave a comment.



Previously in IT Blogwatch:

Don't miss out on IT Blogwatch:


And finally...

Richi Jennings is an independent analyst/consultant, specializing in blogging, email, and spam. A 24 year, cross-functional IT veteran, he is also an analyst at Ferris Research. You can follow him as @richi on Twitter or richij on FriendFeed, pretend to be Richi's friend on Facebook, or just use good old email: itblogwatch@richij.com.

What People Are Saying

cell phone charges

Having read something on Yahoo about the situation that Adam found himself in, I told my daughter about it. We were preparing for a trip to Canada and decided to leave our cell phones at home. No phone contact no texting no downloading to the phone. OMG. Thought we were going to lose our minds... Met some people from Ohio who were clueless about the situation and after telling them what we knew, they shut down their cell phone. Hope their bill wasn't too big. There should be some kind of information to cell phone users in the US about this without the need to call your carrier to find out what the scoop is. When I went to get on AOL through the hotel, I received information that they were going to charge me more money than my regular charges, so I backed up and went in through Explorer, FREE. This is getting to be ridiculous....

AT&T wants to charge me $75

AT&T wants to charge me $75 for "unbundling" their services. Several orders of magnitude less than the estimable Mr. Savage's billing issue, which is precisely why AT&T believes they will continue to get away with charging exorbitant fees for poor-to-no service. (NOTE: Any fee they charge is exorbitant, so I'm guilty of redundancy.) Didn't see the savings they claimed I would by bundling, either.

AT&T Wireless needs love too

I'm starting to wonder if anyone has anything nice to say about AT&T Wireless.

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

9 gigabytes is a huge

9 gigabytes is a huge amount! it would seem impossible that Savage could have used that much data if we was just surfing a couple hours!

9GB? 750MB? Who knows?

Adam Savage was later reported to have said it was actually 750MB.

No idea whether it was AT&T that made the error or Savage.

Welcome to Canada

In Canada we pay a lot for any kind of phone plan, in fact, there is no notion of a fixed rate plan, so technically one can actually get such a bill from a local cell phone service provider for using a PDA. In fact that happened not too long ago. Welcome to Canada and Telecom Monopolies. Enjoy!

9 Gigs? that's imposable.

9 Gigs? that's imposable. I've had my blackberry for 2 1/2 years now and have only used maybe 1! and I use web browsing a LOT! 9 gigs... at mobile connection speeds, that would take a month of CONTINUOUS downloading. Either Adam's got a really bad porn habit or AT&T is full of sh**! I think the later!

ATT Charges illegally on taxes

ATT has long found ways to screw over the consumers. One of the latest is that it has been illegally charging taxes on smart phone internet access. Under US and State laws, it is illegal to charge taxes for internet usage - The cable companies don't do it, Verizon doesn't do it on it's cell data plans, but ATT tries to hide and bundles it's services in such a way that they somehow are 'getting away' with charging taxes on internet access even though they can easily and legally not bill people for them. A class action is brewing on this, but ATT has quashed many individuals who have complained about this practice. They need to be taken off their high horse and stop screwing people over.

A very great story by Philip

A very great story by Philip Ling of Canwest News Service in Canada. Looks like he got an interview with Adam Savage. Look at this reaction!

Check it out:
http://www.canada.com/Technology/MythBuster+uses+Twitter+fight+phone+bill/1740546/story.html

MythBuster uses Twitter to fight $11,000 phone bill
By Philip Ling, Canwest News Service

“Any notion that social media can’t effect real change has just been dispelled by a man who makes a living shedding light on half-truths.

Adam Savage, the co-host of the popular TV show MythBusters, has solved the problem of the unfathomable $11,000 cellphone bill he got while travelling Canada.

This time, instead of using science to find the truth, Savage turned to his Twitter account…”

Disagree

Sadly, Ling falls into the trap of quoting that ridiculous "study" by Srinivasan Keshav without any balancing comment.

Sure, text messaging is almost incrementally-free to provide, so why should we pay a dime per message? The problem is, you can extend that argument to the phone calls themselves.

And then how would carriers make a return on the investment required to build, expand, and maintain the network?

Many academics simply don't understand how capitalism works. Keshav seems to be one of them.