Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Mike Elgan's picture
Mike Elgan

The World Is My Office

Netbooks killing PC and notebook sales? It's a myth.

The conventional wisdom in many industry circles is that tiny netbooks, although great for some users, represent a disaster for the PC-and-notebook industry.

Some claim that people are choosing netbooks as an alternative to larger systems. Another complaint is that ultra low-cost netbooks are driving down the prices vendors can command for otherwise higher-margin desktop PCs and full-size notebooks.

Microsoft blames netbook sales on lower revenue for client software. Specifically, they say they've had to lower their price for Windows XP and Windows Vista for netbook systems to compete with very low-cost Linux alternatives.

The idea that netbooks are damaging the industry is totally wrong. In fact, the industry should love netbooks. Here's why.

I believe there are four powerful forces conspiring to drive down desktop PC sales:

1. The economic meltdown. People aren't buying anything nowadays. Car sales are down. Luxury goods of all types are in the toilet. Desktop PCs are particularly vulnerable because most people already own functioning systems, and consider upgrading simply for better performance to be a needless and costly luxury.

2. A long-running trend from desktops to notebooks. As notebooks have increased in power and declined in price over the past decade, their relative sales have risen compared with desktops.

3. Windows 7. Microsoft has been far more vocal about Windows 7, and many people are waiting for it now.

4. A lack of innovation generally. Desktop PCs are the least innovative areas of consumer technology. For the average user, literally nothing compelling has happened in the desktop PC space since flat-screen LCDs. One WIRED blog suggests that netbooks are "killing PC innovation." I think the opposite is true. I think PC vendors aren't innovating, and that's contributing to the general public apathy toward PCs.

And items 1 and 3 above are also impacting full-size notebook sales.

Meanwhile, there's little to no evidence that most people buying netbooks are doing so instead of, rather than as a supplement to, desktop PCs or netbooks. My observation is that from road warriors to soccer moms to college, high school and even middle school students are buying netbooks either as a supplement to a full-size system or as an alternative to buying nothing.

And netbook buyers are right. Netbooks are fine for occasional use in places where a notebook wouldn't work -- airliner tray table, kitchen counter, history class -- but they're lousy for real, sustained work -- and surveys are starting to prove it.

Because netbooks aren't considered an alternative by buyers, they're not the main factor applying price pressure on desktop PCs and full-size notebooks. 

I think industry insiders and pundits are wrong. The sales and pricing declines we're seeing in desktop and notebook PCs would have happened anyway. Because netbooks are the only hot area of the PC market, OEMs should be counting their blessings.

What People Are Saying

Netbooks, however, are

Netbooks, however, are expected to soar in almost all regions. The strongest areas of growth are expected to be in China and North America, with expected unit growth of 260.3 percent and 136.9 percent, respectively. DisplaySearch predicted Japan would show the weakest growth, with an increase of 29.1 percent. Worldwide, unit growth is expected to be about 99 percent. Notebook computer sales

Go for the netbook

f you do want more computing power (for programming or gaming) and still need portable computing, it is almost cheaper to buy a powerful desktop for your home and a netbook for travel, rather than buying a powerful and more expensive laptop or notebook.

Oh, no way. No netbooks for

Oh, no way. No netbooks for me. I have a Dell desktop that's only a year old that's my big gaming machine and I wanted something to "play" with (email, browsing,etc.) while away from my desktop so I researched the netbook vs real laptop thing before finally deciding on a very nice and affordable full laptop by HP. The netbook just didn't offer enough incentive. I think the two biggest drawbacks were the screen size (I went and looked at one in person to be able to make a clear decision) and the fact that they don't have a CD or DVD drive for installing the software I use daily. I have to look at the "what if my desktop was damaged and the laptop was my only computer" approach and that made me think better about what would be best for me. The laptop I settled on was only $200 more than the netbook and could replace my desktop if an emergency happened. A netbook really couldn't. We can't make big purchases like this often, in fact it will be several years before we will be able to make another upgrade, so this purchase had to be the right thing for the long haul.

Netbook DO kill laptops and

Netbook DO kill laptops and even PC market. Why would I bother buying a 5 pound laptop with 2 hours battery for 2-3 time$ more than a netbook???? Are you out of your mind? lol

The thing is the Atom processor that most netbooks have is more powerfull than a laptop with 1.6GHz processor without hyper-threading. I do the same calculations on my netbook that I did on my laptop and my desktop so netbooks are equivalent and even better in computational power than 2-3 years old laptops. Were those only for email and web browsing too? LOL

Netbook CAN be your primary computer. Just buy a big LCD screen, that's it. Now if you want to play games that require a lot of graphics a netbook wont do but I know people that actually play games on a netbook.

People that underestimate netbooks never actually had one or are owners that have no idea what their netbook can actually do. I often read in reviews that once someone buys a netbook he/she is surprised how fast the thing is and that it can ran the same programs like the laptop. Well DOH, netbook is just a portable laptop, not a retarded cousin ...

Of course the netbook can

Of course the netbook can rival 2-3 year old laptops, according to Moore's law the processing speed would have doubled. That is a huge difference than newer pcs and notebooks.

Also, as I said note, we do own a netbook and I can't stand using it long term. It is horrid for gaming and processing. It works great for a simple word processor, but that is all. And it's not because of the Xandros Linux interface, because I've been using Linux for years.

It's real simple

Netbooks do what people need.

That's it. That's as complicated as it needs to get.

I replaced a 5 year old laptop with a netbook. The laptop works but gets bogged down with Flash-heavy sites and streaming video and has reached the end of its useful life. While I can easily afford a $1500+ notebook, all that extra money fails to provide me with any features or advantages that I don't get in a $350 netbook. For my portable computing, I want email, surfing, word processing, video playback, and maybe some music. While my old laptop had trouble keeping up with that, the new Atom-based netbooks don't break a sweat with those tasks. And they do it at half the weight of a full size notebook for a lot less money.

If I were doing video editing or some other task that requires a lot of CPU power, a netbook would be a poor choice. If I were constantly working on large spreadsheets while travelling, a netbook would be a poor choice. If I wanted to play Crysis, a netbook would be a poor choice.

But quite a few people want something bigger/better than a smartphone when traveling but don't need 5+ pounds of dual core fury to catch up on their email, update a report for a client, and change some text in tomorrow's powerpoint presentation.

Netbooks Not Cannibalizing PC Sales

I think Mike Elgan is right. I bought a Dell Mini 9 netbook with Ubuntu in order to learn Linux and to have a very portable, quick-starting machine mostly for net surfing and e-mail. I love it, but still plan on buying a new 17" laptop for real work, which for me requires a big screen for these aging eyes and a standard-size keyboard for my fat fingers.

A Fundamental Change?

When we come out of the current recession (depression?), as we most assuredly will, I am convinced that the personal computing industry will be fundamentally changed. Yes, we will lose some manufacturers along the way, and others will be permanently altered. But the primary focus of this change will not be on the supply side, rather it will be on the demand side. To wit, the consumer will no longer be swayed by the “bigger-better-faster” mantra that has been the heart and soul of computer economics for the past 50+ years. Unless a user is among the top 5 percent who actually employ a computer at the cutting edge, the remaining 95 percent will come to realize--if they haven’t already--that their comparatively modest needs can be met with comparatively modest equipment. In other words, the average consumer--home or office--already has all the computing power he/she needs. So to use the old business life-cycle model, what we are seeing is the maturing of the computer industry, and unless a new, must-have application arises that demands continued growth, I’m afraid we are witnessing the start of computer commoditization.

For $300 you can check email

For $300 you can check email and surf the web, have a real keyboard, 10" screen and not pay any 2 year contracts... a whole freakin' computer for $300? That's half of what the iPhone cost when it debuted! Why wouldn't you buy a netbook? Especially one you can hack and put OS X on it!

Netbook - Aspire One...

I have a netbook because it is great for sitting
on the couch and reading email, checking web
sites, and chatting with people on messenger.
Yes, it is running Linpus, which is very good
for machines like this.

I also recently bought a tower that I am playing
with (currently running OpenSuse 11.1) that I
am using to create an entertainment system.

Notice neither one has anything Windows on it.

:)