Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


New Ubuntu Linux server is for business

On April 20th, Canonical, the commercial sponsor of Ubuntu, will be releasing Ubuntu Server Edition 9.04 along with the new Ubuntu Desktop Edition and the Ubuntu Netbook Remix. That's great news for Linux fans, but what I want to talk about today is why that's also great news for business.

The new Ubuntu Server does all the usual Linux server edge jobs -- Web and mail services -- and common line of business jobs like file and print. But, it also includes improved virtualization with the new version of KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) and easier integration with Microsoft AD (Active Directory).

Yes, you read that right. The new Ubuntu, both on the server and the desktop side, will now work and play better with AD. According to Steve George, Canonical's Director of Corporate Services, Ubuntu will be pulling this trick because it will be incorporating Likewise Open and Samba 3.3 support.

Likewise Open enables your Ubuntu servers and desktops to AD domains and forests with a single sign-on that works both for the AD and the Linux side of your network. Samba 3.3 adds over-all improvements in compatibility between Linux servers and clients and AD-based network services.

Ubuntu 9.04 also has some interesting virtualization improvements. Besides better KVM support, the server will be available to users on Amazon's EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud).

That's neat, but what I think is really much more interesting is that with Ubuntu 9.04 you'll be able to build your own EC2-compatible cloud on your own servers. This way, you can get a feel for how cloud computing might work for you without worrying with the data and security issues of actually trusting your data and processing to Amazon or another external provider.

As Jane Silber, Canonical's COO said, "With 9.04, larger businesses are now able to deploy Ubuntu in their production environments, and preview the Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud." Exactly. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first operating system that comes cloud-ready out of the box. For that alone, I think anyone considering moving to cloud computing should give Ubuntu a try. It's a perfect way to find out for yourself in the safety of your own network whether cloud computing is for you.

Further showing that Canonical is quite earnest about making Ubuntu a business operating system, the new Ubuntu also includes AMQP (Advanced Message Queuing Protocol) support. AMQP is an important set of middleware and SOA (service-oriented architecture) protocols. Red Hat is the only other Linux distributor that has made a particular point of supporting it until now.

Why is Canonical adding all this big-business functionality to a six-month release? George explained that, "While it's a year away from the next LTS (Long Term Service) release, we want to make sure we get the integration right now to help with the LTS. Our customers already want serious business support so we're being driven by our customers to get it to them now. So, we're listening to both our community and our business customers."

One last part of that listening to business is that Canonical has been working with HP to get Ubuntu server certified on its ProLiant server lines Ubuntu is already ready certified on some other HP, Dell, and IBM servers, and on VMware virtual platforms.

I couldn't say that Canonical is ready to go head to head with Red Hat for the king of the Linux server hill ... this year. I can say, though, that that's exactly what Canonical is planning to do by next year. There are interesting times ahead friends.

What People Are Saying

Its doing the job it does.

Good news.
In our leading company (3000+)we use debian, ubuntu and windows. All serve their purpose.
We dont realy care as to what OS is winning the race. More and more matches are won by open source for some years now. As long as the Operating Systems improves we even like the race.
As for a desktop, we are testing kubuntu.
Maybe in a few years we will run Linux to serve desktops. The winner is always the best one and we dont read the brand names.
So keep on racing dudes, we need that desktop fully operational by 2011.

Marc

I totally agree with you,

I totally agree with you, who cares which OS is winning or which server or company is winning. Important thing is that they are providing good softwares and services to us.

Cloud integration

Hey Steven, I thought the cloud integration was targeted for Ubuntu 9.10, not 9.04. Did they change their mind recently or what?

ref. Shuttleworth: Karmic Koala to make cloud 'dance'

the old man59 vs. Desktop Linux's Ugly Sister Syndrome

theoldman59, You're wasting your time trying to be (occasionally) supportive of GNU/Linux. It's either drink the kool-aid or nothing with these people.

Linux desktop zealots suffer from a mental condition known as "the ugly sister syndrome". In brief, it's a condition likened to having an ugly, yet much loved, sister. No matter how ugly she is in fact, their love for her is totally blind and complete. That she might have a huge festering boil on her face that perpetually leaks putrid, green, slimy, puss down to her chin is lost on them. They will vociferously lash out at anyone who even lovingly tries to point out, or offer suggestions on, how to improve upon her obviously sever appearance deficit.

So it is with the zealots of GNU/Linux desktops. That Linux desktop adoption has suffered numerous defeats in free markets where they initially had a 100% share is lost on them as well.

They learned nothing from the stunning defeat of desktop Linux on the OLPC (One Laptop Per Child)pc's, where even third world charity programs couldn't be convinced in any significant numbers to accept the pre-installed Linux software, opting instead, for the familiar Windows desktop (at a mere $3 a pop).

Remember the cries of "traitor!" ,"turncoat!", and "Microsoft shill!", Nicolas Negroponti received from the so-called community when he finally gave up on the Linux-only option and tried to give the recipients what they desired? Even more telling is his bended- knee, hat-in-hand attempt to get Microsoft to port Windows to the ARM processor that he's using on the OLPC2 (One Laptop Per Child 2)pc, his next innovative charitable initiative.

Nor have they learned from the likewise stunning defeat in the Netbook market. From 100% percent market share to 10% in about a year or so. The Linux desktop was obviously soundly rejected here as well. Of course it's always somebody elses fault. Someone is always conspiring to impede the progress of GNU/Linux's desktop adoption, regardless of the fact that these two huge defeats were in sold into massively dissimilar markets.

Don't even bother offering helpful suggestions like that they might consider lancing that festering boil they call a desktop. To them it's the shining epitome of the desktop paradigm, just as it is. Instead of hanging their heads in shame, as they should, they arrogantly, and belligerently, proclaim it's preeminent perfection.

Since peace offerings coming from anyone who is less than a total zealot are met with utter disdain and derision, you might want to consider your olive branch to be, as they say, "casting your pearls before swine".

Anon, AKA theoldman59,

Go away.

Very quickly.

You are annoying. Very annoying.

The end.

More of this?

I have a joke for you.

A man walked into a bar with a big shirt that said "I hate people who drink in bars" in bold typeface. He walked over to the table, and ordered a hamburger, his eyes flitting about the room.

"I love hamburgers in bars," he proclaimed loudly, as if everyone should care.

Somebody muttered something at the table about how that guy was stupid. The man with the shirt on stood up and walked over to the muttering man.

"God!" he yelled. "You bar drinkers are all alike! All you see is the beer and drinking here! God I hate you and how you use it! You cannot use bars for eating! They belong only to be eaten in!"

"Why?" someone asked.

"Because," the man with the shirt procliamed. "Bars for eating are 90% of the bars in the world. Only 1% actually exist for drinking in, and they're obviously inferior."

"Why?" someone asked again. "I drink in bars and they're completely functional for my needs."

The man with the shirt started a very long rant about how people who drink in bars were all zealots and that anyone who disagreed with him was a beer-drinking zealot. then he sat down, ate his hamburger, and then muttered about how everyone was getting on his case.

The end.

self-correction

fifth paragraph:

"God!" he yelled. "You bar drinkers are all alike! All you see is the beer and drinking here! God I hate you and how you use it! You cannot use bars for drinking! They belong only to be eaten in!"

I'm sure theoldman59 will claim something about how all those "blasted Linux desktop users...using and enjoying something so inferior to my personal favorites that they can't even read their own posts! Get offa my lawn before I gonna shoot ya!"

Needed to correct your

Needed to correct your mistake I see, guess your crap Linux system crapped out on you whilst posting.

but the entertainment value is fantastic

Nice to see others recognize Linux zealots for what they are.

I must admit, I've learned a lot about Linux by challanging the fanatics. Each time they make a claim, I load up my trusty test bed with whatever Linux they claim is the best this week, load up whatever software they claim will save the world and run it until it breaks. Usually doesn't take all that long. I run these from a user perspective, so the tests are pretty quick.

Besides, if there's no differing opinions you enter into serious group think. That's instant death to any group or business. Being challanged constantly keeps me moving forward, the little gray cells active, etc.

The ability to reverse engineer a claim on these boards helps in the work environement as well. It's a challange sorting out the accurate Linux information from the Hype and FUD.

Linux Servers are good, solid and to my knowlege reliable. Nuf said there.

In the end, I might even learn how to spell Ubuntu.

Why

Why can you not understand the other people value different things from software than you? Don't you have another forum to troll?

Go bother the Mac people; they're much more ornery than Linux folks. I'm sure you'd be far more entertained.

Olive branch my butt.