Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


No phone for you: Vonage's weak link

My Vonage service went down today.

My experience painfully points out one of the weaknesses of independent voice over IP phone (VoIP) services. With plain old telephone service (POTS) the only end point device you are responsible for is your telephone. It's the telephone company's responsibility to deliver dial tone to it.

With VoIP services like Vonage, however, you get a small electronic box that attaches to your cable or DSL modem and provides dial tone to your telephone. Vonage's box is called a V-Portal. If it fails, as mine did today, your phone is out of service until you can get a new one. That typically takes two business days.

Fortunately, I have a bit more flexibility with VoIP than I did with POTS. Vonage has every conceivable phone feature and it's all configurable on Vonage's Web site. To cope with the problem over the next few days I went to my Vonage account online and configured the service to ring my incoming calls on another line. And I was able to listen to voice mail messages that came in over the weekend from the Web site as well.

No dial tone? Who ya gonna call?

Vonage is cheaper than my local POTS and it's less expensive than my Comcast voice over IP offering, Comcast Digital Voice. But when something goes wrong Vonage is less convenient. With either of my other telephone services a technician is dispatched to remedy the problem when dial tone disappears. After some initial troubleshooting my involvement is over, although I do still have to wait for service - and that can take a few days.

With Vonage you have two pieces of customer premise equipment: the telephone and the VoIP adapter. You own both, and you're the troubleshooter, or the "smart hands" in the field as someone in Vonage technical support walks you through the troubleshooting steps.

A little misunderstanding

I got right through to Vonage technical support this morning, and the Filipino representative was cordial and earnest, but each of us had trouble understanding the other. For example, it took about a minute of back and forth before I realized that she was asking me to click on the Windows XP "Start" button on my desktop. I just couldn't understand what she was saying.

The problem was that the V-Portal wasn't picking up an IP address from the cable modem. No IP address, no dial tone. That sounds simple, but it took about an hour before she finally isolated the problem to the V-Portal.

Coming to that conclusion involved a lot of swapping around of wires, turning things on and off, a few wild gestures, and finally jamming a pen into a hardware reset slot on the V-Portal and rebooting it. I didn't mind so much, since I've done this kind of thing for a living, but for the average person who just wants a telephone I'm sure this has all the appeal of opening the hood of the car and having your mechanic talk you through connecting and disconnecting all of the vacuum lines on the motor.

Once the replacement unit gets here the new V-Portal should just power up and connect with no muss and no fuss, as the original one did. If it doesn't I'll be back on the phone for another time-consuming round of technical support with my friends from the Philippines.

The price you pay

Even if the new unit solves the problem, I'm still not done. Much as I'd like to use the hockey puck-sized V-Portal for a little skeet shooting, Vonage wants the old unit back. So I've got to fill out the paperwork, enter the return authorization number, follow the packing instructions and then pay to insure and ship it back (failure to do so within 14 days may result in "additional charges"). Fortunately, my unit is still covered by a one year warranty. Otherwise, Vonage would charge me an additional $79.99 for the cost of the replacement unit.

There's a lot to like about independent VoIP service vendors like Vonage or Ooma. They have many more features for less money and offer much greater flexibility than POTS and they're generally cheaper and more feature rich than the VoIP offerings from cable providers like Comcast and Time Warner.

When things go wrong, however, you may find yourself pulling out your hair - and then pulling out the calculator to see if the savings are worth the aggravation.

What People Are Saying

Vonage Charging High Cancellation Fees, Even to the Unemployed

I have been unemployed since October. It's rough out there, but companies like Vonage are making it worse for the unemployed. I was having major DSL problems and, due to high DSL charges and the bad connection, I had to disconnect my DSL. No DSL means no VoIP. Well, because I was canceling service before my year contract was up (and who knew I was signing a year contract? The tiny print did, that's who), Vonage wanted to charge me a cancellation fee of $40, cost of the device ($80), and taxes. There are millions of unemployed people who can't afford their houses or even food and Vonage is making it harder for us all to cope.

Not always like that!

Hi,

I am from Canada, and living in France right now.
I use a service called ippi ( http://www.ippi.fr ), and they deliver me for the first time in a Voip service a great support. When I asked my first question by email, they respond right away with a good response. So, I know exactly what you are saying, but it's not always true ;)

Best Voip adapters are from Sipura/Linksys like the PAP2. I think you can buy it and put the Vonage parameters to use the service.

Bye,

David

statically configured IP address

I had a somewhat similar problem with an AT&T CallVantage VoIP box. When it was new, I set it up with a static IP address to avoid the sort of DHCP related problems described here. That worked great until I took the box with me when traveling and plugged it into another router - one that was using a different range of IP addresses. Of course, by then I had forgotten about the static IP address.

I bring this up because should DHCP break, as seems to have happened in this case, manually assigning the VoIP box an IP address may solve the problem.

VoIP Pros Outweigh the Cons

You're entirely right that there are some "pain points" with VoIP. On the other hand, there are a lot more benefits. You mentioned features: VoIP providers usually offer way more. There is also the portability: when you move, you need not worry about connect/disconnect fees and delay. But, it is also worth noting that there are lots of VoIP options. I have a Skype phone on my desk that allows me to make virtually unlimited calls across the country for $3/mo. No other hardware: just the desk phone. But, if you really want to rely on a company to handle it all for you, you can get VoIP service from your cable company (they call it "digital phone"). There really are a lot of options, each with varying degrees of frustration when you have a problem. But, they all have one thing in common: a lot more value than the old telephone of yesterday.

Well put.

I couldn't agree more. But readers need to now what they may be getting into. My experience is a prime example. See the link to my latest post in the comment below.

You VoIP folks just don't get it.

One phrase: Too many points of failure. Let's see:

--Your phone

--The VoIP hardware

--Your broadband provider's equipment: local switches, central "hub" location servers, DNS servers, etc.

--Local/regional power failure (say bye-bye to cell service, too, if the towers lose power for an extended time)

Yet, those two thin copper wires that bring POTS to your house work just fine, even in a substantial power failure, because of their simplicity and low power demands, that are easily provided at the CO by backup equipment.

VoIP's ONLY advantage is price, period. And what's the old cliche'? "You get what you pay for."

Price is VERY important

I agree that the primary advantage is price. If you make a lot of international phone calls, the world plan for $25 a month is a HUGE discount on what I would be paying without Vonage. There is also the fact I can take the V-portal with me when I travel overseas, and I can talk to the states as if I was in the states. As if in the states translates into "FREE". Yes, it might only be price, but that "only" is a big only.

Oh, I get it!

I definitely get it. I know full-well that the old copper cable could be more reliable. The fact is, though, that most people just do not care for reliability that much. Many are moving to mobile entirely, while some use mobile and VoIP on a wired network. The probability of both going out at the same time are slim. On cost, though: arguably there is little cost difference. AT&T could offer home phone service with unlimited long-distance for $20/mo if they wish. The switch at the CO is paid for and line cards are dirt cheap. On the back-end, they could use VoIP. All carriers are moving to VoIP in the core, anyway. The big question I have is why AT&T does not take advantage of this installed base and retain customers on that copper? They prefer to charge as much as possible and drive customers away from it. So, it isn't that I get what I pay for, but I get what I can reasonably afford. (And I do like to note that my combined Internet, mobile phone, and VoIP service is way higher than my landline bill ever was, even adjusted for inflation.)

POTS phone service is expensive - very

I am in a semi-rural area that has both DSL and cable broadband and I use Vonage (via cable) for both cost and features. If I use my "Bell" local service it costs me $20/month plus a BUNCH in taxes and I get maybe a 10 mile radius before I encounter long distance. In order to extend my local "Bell" service into an "enhanced local" service which will allow me to call the city which is 25 miles away, I will need to pay an additional $20 per month on top of the $20 for local service plus extra in taxes. If I call long distance, now I incur charges from a separate carrier for each minute called plus a BUNCH in taxes on top of the "Bell" costs.

Now with my Vonage 500 minutes account, I can basically call ANYWHERE, ANYTIME - a call is a call generally regardless of destination. It has features my "Bell" service never would or could. And those taxes? There is a federal access charge and sales tax. My phone bill is less than $20 per month - never long distance.

I dont understand the POTS/"Bell" sentiment and a lot of VOIP and Wireless phone users dont either. It is expensive and NOT convenient. Next we will see the phone companies standing in the federal bailout program line and it will be their own fault.

Vonage taxes

You're entirely right that the costs of traditional telephony are outrageous. This is actually the #1 reason why individuals even care to try VoIP: to save money. Honestly, given VoIP at 2c/min or TDM at 2c/min, I'd likely go for TDM, as there is no motivating factor to switch. OK, most VoIP services do offer more stuff, but I don't use most of it.

But, Vonage is not free from taxes. See this article: http://www.dailypayload.com/2006/1013.html.

You will see more taxes in terms of dollars on your POTS line, just because your bill is higher, but I suspect the percentage of your bill going to taxes is not better with Vonage.

And, personally, this bugs me. We are already taxed on our broadband and now we're being taxed for the services we use on top of that broadband.

But, you know what they say about death and taxes. I'm of the mind that the latter seems to help induce the former ;-)