Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


How to make a half-a-billion bucks with Linux

I find it hard to believe that there are still fools out there who don't think you can make money, serious as heart attack money, with Linux and open source. Let Red Hat spell it out for you.

Red Hat reported its 4th quarter results last night, March 25th. I quote: "Total revenue for the quarter was $166.2 million, an increase of 18% from the year ago quarter and 1% from the prior quarter. Subscription revenue for the quarter was $139.4 million, up 14% year-over-year and 3% from the prior quarter. For the full year, total revenue was $652.6 million, an increase of 25% over the prior year, and subscription revenue was $541.2 million, up 20% year-over-year."

Anyone want to bet Red Hat's total revenue will top a billion in 2011?

How is Red Hat doing it? They're doing it the old-fashioned way: they're earning it. RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) is a great server Linux. While all Linux distributions are closely related, how many others have clones, such as Oracle Unbreakable Linux and CentOS, where their main selling point is that they're cut-rate versions of RHEL?

Not that there's anything wrong with that. If you know your Linux and you need to save some money, go for it. But, if you want top-of-the-line corporate technical support with your Linux, you want Red Hat. CIO surveys have consistently shown Red Hat as delivering better support than the other Linux vendors, and, for that matter, just about all the other software companies as well.

Red Hat also does well because, while most companies continue to suffer from the Bush-era financial excesses hangover, Red Hat avoided that nonsense. Charlie Peters, Red Hat's CFO said in a press call yesterday that, "We continue to enhance the company's already strong financial profile. We ended the fiscal year with cash and cash equivalents and investments of $846 million and essentially no debt."

Red Hat doesn't just do Linux though. While JBoss, the heart of its middleware stack, hasn't done as well as Red Hat had first hoped, companies are starting to use JBoss for their application stacks. ISP Covad, for example, recently saved a cool half-million by switching to JBoss for its SOA (service oriented architecture).

The Raleigh, NC-based company has made its hundreds of millions without getting too tied to other companies. While it's true that Red Hat has recently partnered with Microsoft on virtualization, it hasn't gotten into bed with Microsoft the way Novell or Xandros have.

And, as for Oracle acquiring Red Hat? Red Hat CEO, Jim Whitehurst, said "Right now my main focus is on satisfying customers. Let the market chatter be what it is."

It sure looks to me that Red Hat, by steering its own course and delivering the Linux goods, is doing just fine without Microsoft or Oracle. Who knows, maybe in a few years we'll be talking about whether or not Red Hat might buy Oracle the way we are now about IBM buying Sun. Red Hat's showing that Linux and open source is not just a good way to make software; it's also a great way to make money.

What People Are Saying

Good job with calling your

Good job with calling your readers fools. You were off to a great start there. You really had me when you made me certain that you knew absolutely nothing of Linux by suggesting that it would be a good idea users would like to pay for their distros. Not only that, but you suggest that having "top-of-the-line corporate technical support" is a good thing? If you use a computer for five minuets you quickly learn what "corporate technical support" amounts to; pretty much nothing.

I break my computer a lot, it happens. I have never come across a problem that has been solved by a simple query in google. =/

Pop quiz

Today's pop quiz: Which is worse, the "Bush-era financial excesses hangover" or the "Obama-era government spend-a-thon".

Answer: Bloggers who dilute the value of their postings by inserting their own politics, whatever their views.

Hangovers

Since this is apparently a political blog, here's another opinion: The deficit hangover caused by today's binge-spending will only make things worse. Only in America do a majority seem to believe we can spend ourselves out of debt.

as an long-time user of

as an long-time user of linux (I think 5.0 redhat was the first time I installed), I agree with the sentiment expressed here, but trying to get a foothold into the business arena is not that easy. The business world is firmly entrenched in MSworld, with applications only running on MS etc, people frustrated with change - hell, when you upgrade to a new version of something MS the world ends!! Goodness knows what would happen if you change OS on the users. Even openoffice has caused consternation/frustration/cranky end users.
I wish I knew an easy way to convince people, I really do.

Red hat and Support

My two points are regarding Support.

1
"CIO surveys have consistently shown Red Hat as delivering better support than the other Linux vendors"

What do CIOs know about Technical Support - answer not much.

2
I think Red Hat really need to focus heavily on customer experience, It can be very slow and poor theres no eagerness to really resolve issues and provide award winning service.

RHN is dated and poorly organized (Information muddle is everywhere).

If they are not careful their "award winning support" will be exposed for what is really is poor maybe average at best.

With up until...

I was with you until you started the gratuitous Bush bashing. For the record, there are those of us who retain our guns and religion and want a smaller, fiscally responsible government and guess what else? We like and support Linux.

Just adding to the brainwashing..

A poll was taken where a large percentage are already
ready to blame Bush if Obama's plans do not work!

Obama continues to blame Bush for everything, even
though his cronies have been in charge of the
government for more than two years, and the majority
of the 20th century was ruled by Democrats. If the
"ONE" has all the answers, why did he keep his mouth
shut for the two years he was supposedly a senator?

By the way, if you are looking for excesses, look at
the Clinton administration, who was in charge during
the bursting of the .com bubble. People forget Bush
took office during a recession, but was Clinton ever
blamed by the liberals? Of course not!

Small government?

If you want a small, fiscally responsible government why would you support Bush? He presided over a gigantic increase in the size and expense of the federal government.

And 0bama spent more in less

And 0bama spent more in less than 100 days of office than Bush did in 8 years. Whats the point?

Still Bushed

Yeah. Follow our new president's lead and refer to the Cheney-Bush regime as the "previous several years". Avoid inciting the "Guns and God" people.