Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Frank Hayes's picture
Frank Hayes

Frankly Blogging

Who's out first?

Which one will make it out the door at Microsoft first -- Vista or Jim Allchin? We all figured it would be Vista. We all assumed that the Vista team would do whatever it took to deliver Vista before their beloved leader let the door close on him for the last time.

We were wrong.

As of Tuesday afternoon, Allchin is still slated to retire by the end of this year. But Vista is now officially delayed -- again. Volume customers (that means PC vendors and big businesses) will get Vista in November. Retail packages won't hit store shelves until sometime in January.

Or so it says here.

One bleary-eyed Microsoft watcher calls the delay "unthinkable." No, it's not. It's easily thinkable. In fact, we all should have been thinking how unlikely it was that Microsoft would meet a drumhead-tight, nothing-can-go-wrong schedule to get its most complicated software-development project ever completed on time.

But amazingly, most of us (me too) thought it would happen. We bought a lot of rah-rah about how Microsoft's overhauled development process would make software delivery more predictable. And how the Vista troops would rally to make sure Allchin's last hurrah would be a big victory chant, not a Bronx cheer. And how everything was going so well -- right on schedule for Vista to be under everybody's tree in December.

It's really sort of charming that we can still have that kind of childlike faith after all these years, I guess.

Now the faith of all those PC makers and corporate customers is being stretched again. November, huh? Right.

Look, it's March now. That means it's eight months until November. Show of hands, please: Who still believes that absolutely nothing will go wrong in Vista development during the next eight months?

All those with your hands raised, get out of the IT business. You're too optimistic for anyone's good.

Will some version of Vista be sent off to some customers this year? Could be. But it will almost certainly be too late for holiday-season PC sales or for corporate IT shops to get any significant testing started before it's time to close the books on Q4. And a real 2006 release assumes that the last of Vista's major problems are behind it with most of a year's work to go. That's never happened with a major Microsoft product before -- think Yukon, a.k.a. SQL Server 2005.

Yukon came out a year after Microsoft said it absolutely, positively would arrive. So let's take Microsoft's statements about Vista's delivery with an appropriate hill of salt, shall we?

On the other hand, whether Vista will get out the door before Allchin is a different question. Maybe it will.

After all, summer is a pretty nice time for a retirement party, too.

Related Blog Opinion:

What People Are Saying

I think the same google

I think the same google

I agree with John, MS should

I agree with John,
MS should not be defended, I feel it has cheated us over and over again. Why even all of their sportsgames look alike, not that its illegal, but still as a sports game fan, I feel some injustice has been done. MS has been using the same code probably for saving money.

One thing that hasn't been

One thing that hasn't been mentioned--with all the MacFreaks touting how OSX jettisoned everything OS9--was that IBM's OS/2 did that with DOS and DIED! Maybe--and just maybe--MS could get away with dumping all the 9x code and driver compatibility--but we STILL use Simply Accounting 4.0 (the DOS version) One of Canada's major Chratered banks (which has $400 Billion in managed assets--no lightweight) still uses an OS/2 application to run EVERY teller's station in every bank. MS is going to have to choose someday to abandon some compatibility--but the end user is going to need a fair bit of notice before that happens

To quote an idiot: "I have

To quote an idiot:
"I have run my business on Apple products for 4 years now and I simply have no need for any IT support."

Of course you have no need for IT support...You're using a product with less than 4% marketshare...No one CARES enough about Apple to bother even USING it, never mind HACKING it!

As long as you're happy using fringe technology, you can remain blissfully ignorant and free of mainstream attacks. But if you want to compete in the real world, with the big boys, Apple ain't gonna cut it.

"They've been cutting

"They've been cutting corners for years depending on advertisements and hype to sell a third rate operating system to the unsuspecting masses. Their stocks have been flat since they split in February 2003. There is a reason for this, don't take it from me, take it from the industry leaders and foreign governments that won't tolerate a monopoly like the US government will."
...
"...You're using a product (Mac computers, OS X) with less than 4% marketshare...No one CARES enough about Apple to bother even USING it, never mind HACKING it!"

Is there a connection, a causal relationship here?? Anon, go back to school. Learn to think before you puke on others. If the MS monopoly is bad, then be glad there is, in fact, an alternative.

Why does MS deserve to be

Why does MS deserve to be defended? Microsoft deserves to be pilloried. It cheats, it isn't truthful, it misleads and generally isn't deserving of its monopoly. I for one have a belief that if it doesn't change 180 degrees it will ultimately fail altogether.

I have run my business on Apple products for 4 years now and I simply have no need for any IT support. More businesses would be wise to switch to a system that has already -for at least two years- been proved far superior to VISTA.

You know, all the tech media

You know, all the tech media harping about this delay of Vista really smacks of hypocrisy. I mean, Microsoft has been (justifiably) pilloried again and again by the same media for their security flaps, and now when they opt to have a costly delay of the product to address security issues in the consumer versions, they get flak again. Man, they can't win it seems. Let them delay Vista as long as it's needed to get the security issues buttoned up. Anything is better than what happened with XP "The Most Secure Windows Operating System Ever". So what if it isn't out by the Christmas season. It's always Spyware and virus season.

You're right they

You're right they 'Microsoft' can't win. They've been cutting corners for years depending on advertisements and hype to sell a third rate operating system to the unsuspecting masses. Their stocks have been flat since they split in February 2003. There is a reason for this, don't take it from me, take it from the industry leaders and foreign governments that won't tolerate a monopoly like the US government will. The industry is growing up and will no longer automatically settle for a dos extended operating system, especially one with closed file standards. Nobody's too upset about all of this except the Microsoft freaks that wait outside of CompUSA at midnight waiting for the 'next great release'. Companies have better things to do than spend tens of millions of dollars for contracts that will most certainly mean they will have to endure years of vendor lock-in. Yes, can't you just see how upset those IT directors are going to be because they won't have to retool and push out another bug infested image to all the computers and schedule retraining for the staff until next year?