Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Microsoft does it again

It's no surprise really, but Microsoft has done it again.  A statement released by the company's PR firm confirms that Office 2007 is to be delayed, yet again.  Now it looks like it will be sometime in early 2007 (how appropriate) before the Office Suite becomes available to general consumers and small- and mid-sized businesses. 

It's disappointing.  As I've mentioned before, I'm not only a Microsoft Baby, but I'm also a Beta Tester for the Office 2007 suite.  And I'm ever the optimist.  As a Beta Tester, I love the program.  It's much more user-friendly than previous versions of Office.  But that won't do anyone any good until it becomes widely available.

I don't usually pick on Microsoft, but what if other companies worked the way this company does?  Say for example that a car manufacturer went to all of the expense of widely advertising a new model car only to step up a few months before the car is to be released to say that the release is delayed because of customer feedback?  Without a doubt, drivers that were holding out for the new model would begin to look elsewhere.

Of course, they have the option of looking elsewhere.  And I guess that's where Microsoft has us all over a barrel.  There are a few other suites of office applications available, but none are as widely used as Microsoft Office.  So, when the company says it's coming and then changes its mind, there's little that users can do about it.  (Although I'm interested in seeing what comes of Google Office, because that could give us all additional options.)

The flip side of this is that the longer Microsoft takes to develop the program and the more Beta Testers provide input, the better the program will be when it's released.  Software patches and updates are a fact of life, but honestly, I think it's a fact that Microsoft is responsible for creating. 

In the end, we'll wait.  When the program comes out, users will be slow to adopt it, but when they do, they'll find it's well worth the expense of upgrading.  And then we'll all do our regularly scheduled updates (yeah, right).  And when something else comes along, we'll be slow to walk away from Microsoft, because for those of us who truly are Microsoft Babies, it's all we've ever known.  Now, if every business could just figure out how to accomplish this process with their product...

What People Are Saying

It's a shame that Microsoft

It's a shame that Microsoft trashed Data Access Pages in the upcoming version of Access 2007.

I congratulate on their beta test drive set up.

Well the ribbon should be vertical instead of being horizontal.

Who's waiting? I don't know

Who's waiting? I don't know anyone that's "waiting" for a new version. I know I'm not...

Having been applying on line

Having been applying on line for job vacancies, using the "standard" Word Processing software makes sense to me.

However, just how more functions can be added before its feature list becomes 80% that most users are never going to use? Oops too late I guess.

Don't get me wrong, I love playing around with MS Office Pro 2003. If I HAD to create a powerpoint project, I could. IF I must demonstrate basic database design and user forms, I could. Mainly it's been an interesting hobby personally and yes for the large part it is bloatware.

Maybe Open source is the way for businesses to go. Just as easy to use as MS products, but free. Microsoft has created the icon shortcuts, and I remember knowing every single formating shortcut in WP when I was in college, now, I have trouble remembering shortcuts in computer games. Very pathetic I know.

I do love the new format of

I do love the new format of Office 2007. There's more functionality built into this version of Office than any I've seen in the past, and I'm beta testing it, so I'm putting it through the ringer.

My problem at this point (beyond the delay issue) is that this version introduces new document formats, and that's going to muddy the waters for a while. My one request would be that formats had stayed the same, but I guess with some of the functionality, that just couldn't happen.

The problem that folks face

The problem that folks face is that when they go to send files to someone else, then the incompatibility arises. I have a friend who insists on using an older program because she likes it, but if she sends this file to me, or anyone else, well, you can imagine. I don't want a document in ascii text or the like. Yes, older copies of Word perfect and the like work well, and Word will open most of them, but in much of the business world, we have Word, and it works well.

So, even though I don't use most of the "new" features, I'll upgrade, because it makes it easier on me and others.

The author's statements on

The author's statements on usability are valid. There are many computer users who still struggle with the concept of a context-sensitive menu, utilizing secondary mouse clicks. Increased usability, despite bloatware (etc.) is a big selling point. Now for those of us who have our 15 functions memorized and are comfortable with them, then the advantage to buying Office 2007 is, well, hmmm.... I guess it is not for me ...

We also use WP6.1 for all

We also use WP6.1 for all routine correspondence. We also have Word Perfect X3 for its superior PDF editing feature, and Open Office for its ability to read some different file formats. We have everything we need, and we can interchange data with ANY version of Word Perfect, Word, or Open Office! We also use Word Perfect to "disinfect" *.doc files other people send us (just load and save with WP and the evil macros are gone!).

With M$, you can't even be assured that you can read old M$ files! So who needs this hassle? Who wants to pay for the privelege of having useful work obstructed and sabotaged?

Most of the word processing

Most of the word processing where I work is done with WordPerfect 6.1, the rest with Office 2000. Nothing in Office 2003 would make the work done here any easier or better. I'm inclined to doubt that Office 2007 will catch on here.

Of course anonymous is

Of course anonymous is right. The thing that gets me is, why would anyone ever NEED an upgrade to a word processing or spread sheet program anyway? Last time I looked I still use the same 10 characters and 26 letters plus punctuation. As long as I can change the size and style of my fonts, format the page, add a header and footer... and place an image on the page, with spell checker what ELSE could I possibly need? I'm only limited by how fast I can type. Now when M$ (I like that) decides to make an office program that can type what I think THEN I'll sit up and take notice. ...and in a few years when the printers no longer support the "old" Office that I'm using now? I'll either go to Free Office or print it out using Adobe Writer, then open the PDF and print that out using the free Adobe Reader of 2012. For now... later.

Anonymous2

Anon-2 has the right idea.

Anon-2 has the right idea. I'm still using a Win98 system with the last version of Amipro for creating documents. I can import them into Wordpro to create a Word format, which I can import to StarOffice for final formatting. I did buy Word 1.0, but it couldn't wrap text around both sides of a picture. I trashes it when Apipro's trial version did it and more! Wordpro on XP allows me to use the latest printers and things but is like Word-it lacks the capabilities of Amipro that I use most. Amipro on a P-II/266 is faster with graphics/text than Word on a P 4 630!