Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Martin McKeay's picture
Martin McKeay

Security Matters

Insider threats happen less often, but with more impact

Richard Bejtlich had a couple of good blog entries last week about the insider threat (first, second ).  He correctly points out that the number of threats is much higher from external sources.  He also argues that the controls we have in place and the options we have for dealing with insiders are much greater than we'll ever have for dealing with outsiders.  But what he's missing is that so many of the controls we have are circumvented by the fact that we have to trust insiders, just so they can get their job done on a daily basis.

It's hard to differentiate between someone doing their job in a conscientious manner and someone who's maliciously attacking the system.  It's easy to tell when an engineer is getting into the accounting database.  But how well can most programs differentiate between the accountant paying a valid account and the same accountant paying a bogus invoice to their cousin Vinnie?  How is a computer going to tell if the sales person is taking a copy of his contact list so he can make calls on the road and the same sales person taking the list to a competitor?  The real answer is, it probably can't in either case. 

A large part of the problem is that the insider threat isn't a purely technical threat.  It involves making sure your HR department properly screened new employees when they were hired.  It means the physical security of your site has to be considered.  It requires the cooperation of multiple departments in the organization, something IT is not historically the best at.

What People Are Saying

I agree with you that the

I agree with you that the insider threat cannot be solved by IT security alone – several departments need to come together to develop best practices and security guidelines for employees.

Once best practices are in place, IT can better monitor for insider activity and use security violations as an opportunity to educate and reeducate employees. Access control is also an important part of the equation.

In my experience, most insider threat activity is merely employees lack of awareness on polices and making simple mistakes on improper disclosure.

Faizel Lakhani, Reconnex

Richard, I guess we're just

Richard,

I guess we're just focusing on different aspects of the same thing.

Martin McKeay
martin_cw@mckeay.net
http://www.mckeay.net/secure/
Voicemail: 916.231.9479

Good programmers always need

Good programmers always need developing and already developed site and weblogs. Hackers think up all new and new facilities of the breaking in :(

Martin, I'm not missing

Martin,

I'm not missing anything. The first post you link to includes this:

"However, as I've said elsewhere [link to older post], insiders will always be better informed and positioned to cause the most damage to their victims. They know where to hurt, how to hurt, and may already have all the access they need to hurt, their victim."

That earlier link includes this comment:

"My personal opinion is that rogue insiders have the potential to cause the most damage, but the frequency with which they appear and cause havoc is lower than people think. Outsiders, on the other hand, are frequently attacking and exploiting enterprises, but they are not often causing the sort of damage a rogue insider could."

I'm not sure you are right

I'm not sure you are right on the frequency. The ones that are effective at doing so won't brag about it, the company has both a legal and a publicity value in keeping it quiet when folks aren't effective, so the only ones you hear about are going to be those that feel a need to brag about what they've done after they got caught or where the company was so affected that they decided to bring in the legal system and make it public. That will be a pretty small percentage of total incidents.