Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Martin McKeay's picture
Martin McKeay

Security Matters

The first of many identities revealed

The first person to be positively identified due to the AOL search query release this weekend is the lucky Ms. Thelma Arnold.  Or at least the first person to allow her name to be put in print, that is.  I'm willing to bet the authors of the article identified at least one or two other candidates, and Ms. Arnold was just the first they could contact.  Give it another day or two and I'm sure more people will be positively identified.  There's just too much data, too easily searched, for more people to not show up.

AOL has already admitted what they did was wrong.  They've apologized in general, and apparently to Ms. Arnold in particular.  But I still see lawsuits in the near future as more people are found due to their search queries.  And some people won't have innocent explanations for the nature of their searches like Ms. Arnold did.

I have a friend who watched an episode of CSI a couple of years ago and saw something he'd never seen before, furries.  He was fascinated by the fact that there are people out there who like dressing up in animal costumes to indulge in their fantasies.  He spent a couple weeks doing searches and laughing whenever he found some strange new twist to this fetish.  Then one day he satisfied his curiosity and moved on.  Imagine if his search queries had been part of the data AOL exposed to the Internet.  If you were researching some of the account information in the database, what would you think of someone who's been spending a lot of their time searching for 'furries dalmatian Virginia'?

There is the potential for a lot of embarrassing, personal information to be revealed because of AOL's mistake.  The reporters and the mildly curious will probably forget about the database in a week or two.  But the malicious and the obsessive amongst us will keep at the database for months to come.  When are we going to hear about the first attempts to blackmail someone who's been searching about their personal kink?  Or until someone is arrested based on the searches they did?  The information is there for the people who have the time and the skills to ferret it out.

Privacy isn't quite dead in the era of the Internet, but it's taking quite a hit.  Most people don't realize that their search queries aren't just answered and dropped.  All of the search companies keep track of the queries, it's just a question of how long.  The queries you make reveal a lot about you, what your interested in and what you've been researching.   Which is exactly why so much effort has been spent in keeping the search queries out of the hands of the government.  We have to defend our privacy if we want to keep what little's left, and companies like AOL aren't making the job any easier.

What People Are Saying

One more thing. Isn't

One more thing. Isn't America wonderful???? While I hear many complaints about how horrible it is to have our privacy at risk, I have to remind everyone and myself that with freedom comes risk. We are all here chatting about how angry we are at a rather large public company, criticizing our government at many levels, and pretty much having a grand ol' time doing it.

This is not possible in many countries around the world, and especially not in China.

We are free people and because we are we don't really have any privacy. Remember it's a trade-off.

"For some crazy reason,

"For some crazy reason, people who should know better (IT people) think that searching for escorts on the Internet is somehow different to looking up an escort agency in the printed White Pages in the privacy of your own home....The Internet is NOT private and was never intended to be that way."

These statements appear to contradict one another, but I think I know what you're trying to say...

If I look up "escort services" in the printed White Pages in the privacy of my own home, no one knows I did so unless I *tell* them I did (or if my housemate sees me doing so).

Put another way, your next-door neighbor doesn't know what you look up in your paperback White Pages, while the two of you are sitting in the comforts of your respective homes. Why, then, should your next-door neighbor have the ability to "see" what you look up in the Yellow Pages if it's "online"?

Be careful how you tie such a notion to the statement "The Internet is not "private" and was never intended to be that way". People might get the wrong idea....

Check out this search

Check out this search engine:www.ixquick.com

It's not US based. Read their privacy statement.

This was no "mistake". This

This was no "mistake". This was totally intentional. Now AOL and the government can sit back and say OOPS! we never meant this to happen. BUT, since it DID, we might as well use it. My question now is this. What provider isn't watching what we are searching for? What provider is the best as I, unfortunately, have AOL as my kids wanted it years ago and I never changed. I am dropping them this week. Can anyone advise me as to who is a good provider or what I can do other than start to do a query on a class action suit against AOL?

I don't believe that AOL

I don't believe that AOL released the information accidentally. How can a company like AOL be blind to the recent news on how Govt. forced Google, Yahoo and other search engines to part with their search query database. Even a layman would have understood that such data is precious and should not be parted with. But AOL gave away the data literally for free.

If a company like Google gives the data, its ok because they are offering their search services for free. We are not paying a cent to get their services. But AOL charges its customers for the internet services. As such they must be careful in playing with the interests of their customers. AOL must definitely be punished for their negligency.

AOL released these documents

AOL released these documents 'accidentally'. Who wants to bet that the FBI and Homeland Security received an enormous benefit from the 'mistake'? Our gov't is cracking down on our freedoms by detaining peaceful protestors, pressuring Amazon to drop the book "America Deceived", stealing private lands, illegally wire-tapping phones and conducting improper search and seizures. All with the help of corporations like Amazon, AT&T, Sprint and Verizon. It's only a matter of time before they control the internet.
Final link (before an 'accident' happens to Google Books):
America Deceived - Book

There is no privacy with

There is no privacy with "search and seizure" protections in place. Have you been traveling over the last couple years?

There is very little difference between what occurred at the beginning of tyrannical communism and now; in fact, this administration has hired ex KGB members as consultants. Do you think they are learning how to play solitaire?

NO! Communist Russia kept files and information on every single person.

And now so does "the freest country in the world."

You're not living in reality if you think there isn't an access file on everyone with every little detail on it.

You'd think, for instance, that if I go to my doctor I could keep my medical records private right? Wrong!

The government has full access to that information (as well as your HMO/PPOs "marketing" partners).

The only way I can get around the government having access to my PERSONAL medical information is if I DON'T use insurance and insist my doctor not place my medical information in my HIIPA file (another forced creation of the government so they have one central location where they can cull thousands of terabites of medical information on all of us).

Ever wonder why when you are tested positive for something like diabetes suddenly you're getting a bulk of advertising SPECIFICALLY from some drug company letting you know "for your own best interests" (OF COURSE it is) what's available out there?

We are and will continue to be only a consumer in the eyes of those who lost their humanity many years ago.

We aren't people anymore. We aren't human - we're consumers whose only value is something to make money off of.

It's disgusting what this world has devolved into.

I tool the AOL data and

I tool the AOL data and dumped it into SQL and ported it to web

Trying looking at it with

Trying looking at it with this search engine: http://www.splunkd.com/
Personally, I'm amazed that so many, uh-um, offensive websites exist. This search engine lets you see a graph by time and you can tell which user IDs were looking at which sites on which day of the week and at what hour. Very interesting.

Ryan -> Try writing a

Ryan ->
Try writing a defence of the Bush administration without using the word "lefty" (or "liberal, but you didn't use the one).
Accusing everyone who disagrees with Bush policies (in other words, people who prefer honesty, truth, and integrity of the Constitution) of being a "lefty" or a "liberal" just proves that you don't know what those two words mean. If you did, you'd also realize that the fact that "lefties" and "liberals" exist balances out the political process so that the regime doesn't become too revolutionary or reactionary. Nonetheless, that doesn't make anyone disagreeing with Bush a "lefty".

Rico.