Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Lithium ion batteries: High-tech's latest mountain of waste

Dell plans to recycle however many of the 4.1 million recalled batteries that customers turn in (see Dell battery recall not likely to have big environmental impact), but what happens to the other 2 billion lithium ion batteries which will be sold this year? Most will last for 300 to 500 full recharges (one to three years of use) before failing and ending up in your local municipal landfill or incinerator.

Is that a bad thing? No... and yes.

According to the U.S. government, lithium ion batteries aren't an environmental hazard. "Lithium Ion batteries are classified by the federal government as non-hazardous waste and are safe for disposal in the normal municipal waste stream," says Kate Krebs at the National Recycling Coalition. While other types of batteries include toxic metals such as cadmium, the metals in lithium ion batteries - cobalt, copper, nickel and iron - are considered safe for landfills or incinerators (Interestingly enough, lithium ion batteries contain an ionic form of lithium but no lithium metal).

But that doesn't mean Americans should be dumping 2 billion batteries per year into the waste stream.

Europeans have a dimmer view of landfilling lithium ion batteries. "There is always potential contamination to water because they contain metals," says Daniel Cheret, general manager at Belgium-based Umicore Recycling Solutions. The bigger issue is a moral one: the products have a recycling value, so throwing away 2 billion batteries a year is just plain wasteful - especially when so many American landfills are running out of space. "It’s a pity to landfill this material that you could recover," Charet says. He estimates that between 8,000 and 9,000 tons of cobalt is used in the manufacture of lithium ion batteries each year. Each battery contains 10 to 13% cobalt by weight. Umicore recyles all four metals used in lithium ion batteries.

The reason why more lithium ion batteries aren't recycled boils down to simple economics: the scrap value of batteries doesn't amount to much - perhaps $100 per ton, Cheret says. In contrast, the cost of collecting, sorting and shipping used batteries to a recycler exceeds the scrap value, so batteries tend to be thrown away. Unfortunately, the market does not factor in the social cost of disposal, nor does it factor in the fact that recycling metals such as cobalt has a much lower economic and environmental cost than mining raw materials. So we throw them away by the millions.

As in many areas of environmental protection, the European Union is far ahead of the U.S., having passed a battery recycling law that will require vendors to reclaim for recycling a minimum of 25% of the batteries they manufacture and sell - including lithium ion. It's a shame we can't provide economic incentives to do the same on this side of the pond.

Related Opinion:

What People Are Saying

OK, I have over a 1000

OK, I have over a 1000 pounds of lithium batteries for sale? Whats anybody's offer? I will provide free delivery also, thank you, DanO
C:619-207-1629

I don't want any in my

I don't want any in my house.

> I'm surprised that the

> I'm surprised that the writer is surprised
that litium ion is used rather than the lithium.

Perhaps the writer was writing for the readers, who may not be aware of these details. I personally have never considered what was in these batteries and when the recall news came out I heard several technical folks comment on the use of "lithium" and how it burns. I now understand this technology a bit better.

> If something as rarely disposed of as a lithium ion battery is straining our landfills...

I don't recall seeing anything in the artical about landfills being strained, only about the possibility of contamination leaking and contaminating water supplies. Living near a closed landfill that has contaminated a water supply with tragic results, I can say it pays not to ignore this issue.

Any goofball that thinks

Any goofball that thinks even a drop of ink was used in the writing of this article is thoughtless.
Fact: There is an environmental impact that is not being factored into the cost of these products.
Fact: Americans are the most wasteful society the earth has ever seen.
This guy is only suggesting we start fixing the problem.

I'm surprised that the

I'm surprised that the writer is surprised
that litium ion is used rather than the lithium. You'd think that someone who is writing as some sort of authority would know the basics of a battery technology as old as
lithium ion. Makes me doubt that he knows any more about the efficacies of recycling the batteries or the total "social cost" (that means the cost is not calculable). If something as rarely disposed of as a lithium ion battery is straining our landfills, then I'd say our landfill problem is beyond redemption, lithium or no lithium. That has to be the silliest and most thoughtless argument I've heard in quite some time. As inflexible and inefficent as the Euro economies are, it is nice to know they are really into recycling. Unfortunately, I doubt that their efforts are as efficient as Mitchel believes. Lithium ion is simply not worth recycling and the idea that they are making the landfills bulge is hilariously and preposteriously silly and absurd. Arguments
that are data deficient, as this one is, are a waste of ink. Now there is a lot of wastage!

EVERYTHING strains the

EVERYTHING strains the landfills. And 2 billion things per year is definitely a strain, whether they are batteries or paperclips. Anything that can be removed from the one way trip from manufacturing to landfill is one step toward the better.

The mention of Lithium is parnethetically placed in the article in reference to the molecular metals that are contained in the batteries. It is an interesting fact. If you don't know battery technology (most people don't) you may not know that "Lithium ion" refers to the ionic lithium and not to a reaction between lithium and ions (as in Lead Acid.)

I found the article informative and points out a flaw in our society's throw away mentality. A point that you have unwittingly reinforced. We think about what we must save, instead of what we could save from our landfills.