Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Senate committee uses sleazy poll to kill network neutrality

A key Senate committee is using a phony poll to try and kill network neutrality. The poll, which purports to show that Americans are against network neutrality, was in fact funded by one of network neutrality's biggest foes -- Verizon. And the poll's findings are the exact opposite of what the committee says they are.

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation issued a press release about the poll, as a way to back up its action to kill network neutrality. Any pretense that this poll is fair -- or that the fix wasn't in -- only needs to read the headline: "Bipartisan Poll Shows the Majority of Americans Favor Video Choice Over Onerous Net Neutrality Regulations."

It goes downhill from there. The survey, in fact, actually found that hardly anyone in the country has heard of network neutrality, much less has an opinion about it. The survey found, according to the release, "very few registered voters are familiar with the issue of network neutrality. In some regions of the country, only 5 percent of likely voters had even heard of “Net Neutrality.”

If hardly anyone has heard of network neutrality, how can a majority of Americans be against it? The committee isn't saying.

The survey asked a variety softball questions, such as whether respondents want a choice of video providers. Then through some sleight of hand, the committee claims the answers show Americans are against network neutrality.

The real kicker here is found at the bottom of the release, which reveals that Verizon paid for the survey. Considering that Verizon has been fighting network neutrality tooth and nail, does anyone really believe a survey they fund will be fair?

This is just one more example of the sleaze associated with the opponents of network neutrality. They'll stoop to anything to kill it.

What People Are Saying

The Net Neutrality issue

The Net Neutrality issue will most likely be defeated as those in favor of it have deep pockets and excellent lobbyists. This in concert with the fact that the entire Congress is in the hip pockets of the 35,000 registered lobbyists now pushing their client's issues - complete with generating their bill's verbage, and well...you get the picture.

It's a done deal.

On the other hand, I can see where streaming video will cause anyone delivering the last mile big headaches when pipes become over taxed with high-res programming. Anyone can buy programming from any source, and bog down the network.

Imagine a thousand cable subscribers in the same neighborhood downloading a thousand different high-definition movies at various times after 8:00 PM on Saturday night.

No network was ever designed for that kind of usage. On the contrary, they are designed for a statistical average usage distributed over far more users (8 to 10 times in voice circuits) than the network can actually carry.

So if we are going to have video over IP, somebody's got to pay for that use, and the $35 a month I pay now for my Verizon fiber will not cover it. So I can see their point.

Highways suffer the same issue. At 4:30 to 6:30 there can be a real problem when they can't handle the "average" traffic they were designed for. So along came toll roads. If you want express service, you pay for it.

The same will most likely be true for this media. It's just another "highway".

dave...

Here is an example of a good

Here is an example of a good analysis in favor of the net neutrality debate:

http://www.aeanet.org/publications/idjj_net_neutrality_overview.asp