Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


IT Blogwatch's picture
IT Blogwatch

A Daily Digest of IT Blogs from Richi Jennings

Vista's SPP: bastard child of WPA and WGA? (and geek wallets)

How YOU doin'? It's IT Blogwatch, in which Microsoft promises never to kill your PC, oh no, no way, not at all, next question? Not to mention geek wallets...

Eric Lai reports it for us:

Microsoft Corp. today confirmed that it plans to overhaul its antipiracy technology in Windows Vista, a move it hopes will avoid the problems associated similar efforts in Windows XP and plug a longtime gap ... volume licensing customers are currently issued a single key ... no matter how many machines the software will be installed on ... Stolen volume license keys often end up on the Internet, where they can be reused millions of times by pirates and unwitting users. Under the Microsoft Software Protection Platform (SPP), business customers of Microsoft will be forced to tighten up how they install software.
...
Customers who decline to or cannot successfully validate their copy of Vista during installation will be blocked from using certain features and will receive recurring messages urging them to validate or buy the software. Features they will be excluded from include Aero, Vista's updated graphical user interface; ReadyBoost, an application that uses flash memory to add to RAM and boost system performance; and Windows Defender, which protects against viruses and spyware.
...
After 30 days, the operating system will go into ... "ugly mode" similar to Windows Safe Mode, and grant users one final hour of access to a Web browser to strongly encourage them to validate or buy a legal license of Vista through the Internet.

Ed Bott says, "I told ya so":

Back in June, I took a bunch of heat from Microsoft when I reported that the company was planning to roll out a Windows “kill switch” this fall. Microsoft denied it. Now, today, comes an announcement of the Software Protection Platform for Windows Vista, which sounds pretty damn close to what I wrote about in the first place.

If your copy of Windows Vista is “identified as counterfeit or non-genuine” you’ll be kicked into “reduced functionality mode” ... There is no start menu, no desktop icons, and the desktop background is changed to black ... After one hour, the system will log the user out without warning ... Sounds like a kill switch to me.

Todd Bishop adds his 2 cents:

In other words, the technology doesn't turn the computer off. However, for most practical purposes, it renders much of the operating system useless ... It will be interesting to see how this plays out, given the history of Microsoft's existing Windows Genuine Advantage tool. Among other things, the anti-piracy measure has been a target of allegations that it erroneously labels some genuine Windows XP copies as invalid.

Your humble blogwatcher is incredulous:

Let's see if I have this straight. In its ongoing effort to thwart pirates, Microsoft is going to prevent its anti-malware bits from working on a PC running pirated Windows Vista? ... So it's fine for PCs running pirated versions of Vista to spew spam and malware into my inbox? Stupid, stupid, stupid.

Ars's Ken Fisher has his sources, too:

Microsoft's primary concern at this point is stopping both casual piracy and counterfeiters. I know from conversations with people inside the company that there are conflicting approaches to how to deal with this problem, but no one is under the illusion that that SPP, WPA, or WGA is going to completely eliminate piracy. The company is interested in continuing to build tools that make it difficult and inconvenience to be a pirate, however.

Mary Jo keeps digging:

Microsoft is providing publicly little more than bare-bones details about these technologies and how they’ll figure in its next-generation products ... Testers I’ve talked to are not too thrilled about the systems-management headaches they believe will result from Volume Activation 2.0. They just see it as yet another service they’re going to have to administer.

Cyrus Farivar connects the dots:

We all thought that Microsoft was asking for trouble when the company announced previously that it would be including all the versions of Windows Vista on a single DVD, setting the stage for those in the know to crack the disc and save themselves some cash by installing Ultimate when they likely bought (ok, probably pirated via BitTorrent) a Vista DVD. Well, Microsoft has fired the first salvo in this war on pirates ... So for those of you keeping score, Microsoft wants to make using your computer as miserable as possible
...
If we were betting types, we'd guess that the odds are pretty favorable that this anti-piracy measure will be defeated just as fast as PlaysForSure was.

Dwight Silverman accentuates the negatives and eliminates the positives: [you're fired -Ed.]

Much has been written -- usually in anger -- about Windows Genuine Advantage, which does a check to ensure your Microsoft operating system isn't pirated before you're allowed to download upgrades and additional programs. WGA is prone to false negatives [sic], sometimes declaring a copy of Windows to be illegitimate when actually it is quite legitimate. When this happens, you're forced to contact Microsoft and explain yourself, proving that your copy is real before you're allowed to download the goodies.
...
Certainly, Microsoft has the right to protect itself from piracy, but this is the kind of thing that it had better get right, given how dire the consequences would be for its customers if it gets it wrong. Unfortunately, that's not been the history of WGA so far.

James Robertson rants:

The problem with this kind of *cough* feature *cough* is the triggering conditions - any false positive is a disaster waiting to happen, and anyone who's been around software for the last few decades knows that no hardware/software test is 100% reliable. Microsoft is trodding the well known path followed by most mature companies: they got big, their initial visionaries have left, and they're getting increasingly stupid about preserving existing revenues.

But the Best Headline award goes to Harpreet Kaur:

Microsoft To Rip Your Head Off If You Pirate Vista

Buffer overflow:

Around the Net

Around Computerworld

And finally... Top Ten Geek Wallets

Richi Jennings is an independent technology and marketing consultant, specializing in email, blogging, Linux, and computer security. A 20 year, cross-functional IT veteran, he is also an analyst at Ferris Research. Contact Richi at blogwatch@richi.co.uk.

What People Are Saying

Yes MicroBux should just

Yes MicroBux should just made all the software and OS platforms just work better! I'm getting tired of the OS' that they've passed off as working well enough on 512 megs of ram and Vista needs 1gig or more to run, but seems if its not 2-3 gigs ram its a waste when you have to upgrade to keep up.. seems they help the OEM and pc builders more to sell more hardware and softwa lol ( Linux has run far better on 256-512 and yet has more software to boot as well), yet Microbux has to hike up the cost of the OS to drain all your money from your pockets ( OEM isn't the same for that issue as its been common practice for them to have a hidden partition to hold a copy of the OS thats installable) imagine how that must have been messed up when Microbux fux'd up big time! WPA, WGA etc, its a waste of time and money.. yet Microbux can get you to addon IMG to your Windows Live Msgr to help them donate to your fav charity.. lol go figure, bad software will be around a long time when its never really completed right the first time around ( whats the use of beta testing if you don't listen to the customers?), guessin life is like that every where.. roll out an update, roll out another security fix and roll out one more new patch when needed.. IMHO, they're getting slower on fixes.. while linux matures :) God bless Free Software and OS'! and btw, how will they ever get around the BIOS Slic 2.0 that helps identify the XP or Vista OEM Key supported? hackers will go to great lengths for testing.. and to top it off, it works! Far be it for any average joe to want to mess up a bios with a modded slic 2.0 hack.. yet theres plenty already that are a google at your finger tips! MicroBux, can you keep up?

Has anyone considered or

Has anyone considered or investigated the possiblity that the WGA program is a conscious effort on the part of Microsoft to "encourage" the installed Windows XP user base to convert to their Vista debut? The timing of their release of the final version of WGA a few months before Vista is to debut is troubling. Also, are certain users exempt from WGA? I cannot believe that government agencies would allow WGA to transmit the dozen or more details of information it does about their computers back to Microsoft!!!

Time to buy a MAC ....

Time to buy a MAC ....

lol linux user, people want

lol linux user, people want a "do it all" OS, if they dont then, ya i could still be on PII 300mhz using linux, i had slackware version with this pc and ya i couldnt do much more then edit text, play with gimp and hear some music and that many years ago and at right now with same computer i wouild still able to do the same stuffs.

but ppl need a OS that can do it all, being it media, gamming, for officie, etc...

its much more easy to build your own pc and instal windows, then by a limited mac or install linux, cuz we can do alot more with windows and dont blame its damn good, if it werent i wont have so much sucess.

bring linux to understand windows app fully and not a thing such as wine or similar, how about something similar to directx or compatible, then put it all together and then if not much bugs then it would be a worth for end users that want it all. because u all blame windows but it has so many things and made some many things possible, so there gotta be some stuffs left.

but for all that was said, i do not like the price and how vista is going to be

You know there is a

You know there is a solution, but it is way under funded... All it needs is $$$ to get it to the stage of relesing a full operational version.

It runs windows apps and needs some fluent programmers to help and $$$ to get it running

Visit www.reactos.org to find out more about the replacement of M$ windows 98 me nt 2000 and xp OS soon to enclude vista

WPA = Window Pain in the Ass

WPA = Window Pain in the Ass

As an IT professional I have

As an IT professional I have to admit that I am not altogether impressed. I don't see this as a solve all, end all to Microsoft's pirating problem. I see it as a way for malicious code to infiltrate and attack Microsoft customers by tapping into the tools designed to keep pirates out. In my opinion very few machines will actually register false positives. The problem will be when your hard drive crashes and you have to revalidate. Otherwise it is nothing more than an exploitable tool for hackers to tap into.
I could be naive, but I would assume that Microsoft's front to stop piracy would be nothing more than a challange to those who would seek to do something about it. I honestly don't want to have to coordinate massive fix actions when my enterprise users can no longer validate through the network... or deal with my home user customers on side jobs when they are suddenly unable to use their machine for more than an hour.

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAWN, I am

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAWN, I am hoping one day MS will realize that if they charged an acceptable amount for their often problem plagued software - they wouldnt have such a piracy problem

I would bet they would sell 10 copies of vista at $59-69 dollars faster than they could sell 1 copy at $179+

regardless, I give it a whole 2 weeks past release before there are hacks and workarounds to nullify this "security" they've added.

Microsoft, get a clue, you are absolutely worthless when it comes to making solid security and this system will be broken as fast as all the previous attempts, my advice? work on the product and its flaws and quit putting even more time in a system you know as well as I do is not going to solve your piracy problem. It is a joke at best.

PLEASE get a clue. It's not that hard to figure out.

This is as close to SaaS and

This is as close to SaaS and subscription services as you can get but you still pay big bucks up front.
I can see people putting off Vista as long as they can, I know I wil be. The price and conditions that come with Vista are enough to make me an Apple fan when it comes to new systems and a linux fan when it comes to reloading my current systems when XP is no longer supported.
Vista is nothing but BLOATWARE, simply a poorly coded version of XP with a Mac GUI ripoff.
But take heart all you that want to go with Vista. With all of the beta copies out in the public domain and the OEM copies coming I give SPP a life of 6 Months before it is cracked. Then you will be able to run Vista as long as you want but you will have to get your patches through third party patchers, shavlik, etc.
I see no point in throwing such an enormous amount of good hardware at an OS that offers more liabilities than features.

The new school at Microsoft

The new school at Microsoft is forgetting the one "big thing" that ensured their dominance dating back to the 1980s.

Piracy. Piracy is Microsoft's best friend and worst enemy. The ease of which DOS, Windows 3.1, Windows 95, NT and 2000 could be pirated ensured complete and total desktop dominance for Microsoft.

Pirates have helped Microsoft push new standards down people's throats because if someone didn't have the capability in the OEM operating system to handle the new standard, people would just pirate the newer version and wa-la, Microsoft's standard would become defacto reality because everyone could use it.

Really, almost everyone who buys a computer (excluding techies who will always be able to pirate the damn software) gets an OEM copy with the machine.

The problem is the upgrade cost is too much. You buy a Pentium 4 and it comes with XP. It runs XP like a bat out of hell. Now Vista comes along and you have to spend $400 upgrading your computer to be ready. Then another $200-$600 on the OS? Why not buy another computer with Vista OEM, it's cheaper and you end up with a better product. Wait- no just pirate the Vista OS and upgrade your computer.

Microsoft should be focusing their energies on "Microsoft Licensing Subscription Services". You pay $199 retail or $99 OEM for the software, or you pay $49 per year for the most current version of the software and if you stop paying your computer dies.

Another case of full speed in the wrong direction.