Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

It's time for the Feds to subsidize broadband

The U.S. is falling so far behind the rest of the world in broadband that it's time for the government to take some action -- and Senator Hillary Clinton's proposed Rural Broadband Innovation Fund is a good first step.

Now, I know there are a lot of wingnuts out there who believe that Senator Clinton is the spawn of the devil, but whatever you think of Clinton, her idea is on-target. The U.S. lags behind the rest of the industrialized world in broadband deployment -- coming in at a lousy 16th worldwide -- and one part of the reason is that if you're in a rural area, you simply can't get a broadband connection. Only 17 percent of rural households have access to broadband, studies have shown.

This has implications not only for those who can't get broadband, but for the rest of us as well. There's a multiplier effect at work in broadband access; the greater the number of people who have it, the better off the general economy will be.

Even the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA), no great fan of government action, recognizes that lack of broadband access is hurting the country.

“America has fallen behind in broadband penetration, reducing our relative efficiency in a number of ways,” TIA President Matthew J. Flanigan noted in a recent press release touting the fact that one million homes and businesses now subscribe to fiber to the home (FTTH) services.

You can be sure that those homes are not in rural areas. Telcom companies target only high-income suburbs for their FTTH deployments, and ignore both cities and rural areas alike. That's why the government needs to step in.

Clinton's bill would set up the Office of Rural Broadband Initiatives at the Department of Agriculture. The office would administer grants and loan programs to encourage investment in broadband infrastructure in underserved rural areas. It would also create a Rural Broadband Innovation Fund which would invest in services hat can deliver broadband service to rural areas including satellite, fiber, WiFi, and broadband over power lines (BPL).

There are some things the government can do well, and others it can't. This is an instance in which it can do a great deal of good, with seed money, investment, and encouragement.

After all, the Internet began its life as a government project as well, and that investment paid off pretty well.

What People Are Saying

I agree with Ken. I believe

I agree with Ken. I believe that access to the internet will eventually be considered a utility. What do you think makes distance learning more efficient and interactive than it has ever been? Dial up? Hardly. This country can't wait for selfish people like the first poster to realize that we will all benefit from a connected society. Porn is available on paper, video and telephone chat lines. Don't cloud the issue with quasi-moralistic rantings.

It just goes to show you how

It just goes to show you how much of a Socialist Hillary is!

I live in New York and

I live in New York and happily use dial-up. It suits me fine but then, I'm a bit of a crank. I like reading my email in PINE, and feel very attached to Telnet. I also have a blog that uses a template so old that some people can't believe it's really a blog. I have no plans to change that.

Okay, so what's my point. While I indulge these little style quirks, the company that manages my website has broadband, of course. Dial-up is a choice for me, not something forced upon me by circumstance. It's like wearing vintage but knowing you can always buy some new clothes if you really want to. (I don't, btw, do the vintage look when it comes to my clothes.)

I'm sorry to hear people bashing dial-up but I can see why it would be frustrating if you didn't have the option.

I live in a semi rural area,

I live in a semi rural area, and I can't get affordable broadband (no DSL, wireless or cable).

Affordable is the key word. I could get a t1 line to my house, or I could get sat internet, but its not worth it. If you have a business and live in a rural area you have options if you have money.

If the government wants grant money to assist people to get sat or t1 lines then fine. But please dont hand out cash to the scumbag telecom/cable companies!

This should be a local government issue anyway. They have franchise agreements and they should enforce full buildout. Take the good with the bad I say.

I agree with "Do the Math"

I agree with "Do the Math" and "Ohhh Ken". I personally think it's cool for the government to get involved with R&D of new technology, but getting involved with the distribution of existing technology with existing private, competitive sources of distribution, that may eventually be replaced by some other technology, is like flushing money down the toilet. Guys: broadband will continue to deploy to more and more areas the way it already has-without government intervention. Can't wait? Move!

Ohhh Ken....Highways are

Ohhh Ken....Highways are forever...technology isn't. The kinds of infrastructure that government should be responsible for subsidizing should be sustainable for a very long term, not just for as long as it is the "Technology Du Jour".

Hmmmm, "technology isn't"

Hmmmm, "technology isn't" And what world are you living in? LOL I believe millions of people would beg to differ with you on that comment. Technology is growing exceedingly fast and will be here forever. Thanks for contributing to my smile today :)

The government is

The government is responsible for infrastructure. Ever hear of the interstate highway system? Sometimes it is necessary to develop the infrastructure before all the benefits are seen or realized.

Do the math. The US is the

Do the math. The US is the 3rd largest country in the world- IN GEOGRAPHIC AREA- out of roughly 244 countries (Russia is #1, Canada is #2). I don't know which countries are the top 15 in broadband deployment, but I don't think Russia and Canada would be in the top 20. The US is often compared to Japan in broadband deployement, Japan affording internet access to many people in many places. Japan has, at most, 40% of the land mass that the US has! If you did an analysis that rank countries according to private industry investment in proportion to geographic land mass, you would conclude that the US is doing pretty darn well. The federal government needs to stay out of the broadband business. Many companies are already investing to provide wireless broadband to rural areas where wireline broadband deployment would be too expensive. If you are one of the unfortunate who need broadband and can't get adequate service, and can't wait until it gets there, MOVE! What's next? You refuse to be happy until you have a view of the ocean from your Illinois farm, so the government should create a habitat to make you happy? People need to weigh their wants and their needs and make their own decisions on what's more important to them and follow their dreams, not wait until the dreams get delivered to them via Federal Government Express. The government isn't there to give everyone everything they want without having to sacrifice anything. Let's spend our federal money where it's truly needed, and let private industry take its course.

I'm for rural broadband.

I'm for rural broadband. Bring it on, Hillary! Dial-up? Gimme a break! Satellite? Who has an extra $600 for equipment and installation, plus $60 per month to spend for a lousy 700k download? Not me!! Wireless? Not available. GO HILLARY!!!