Certification is about clearing the hurdles, not proving knowledge
- IT TOPICS:Careers, Management, Security
I'm a CISSP, I used to be a CCNA, and soon I'll have the GIAC-GSNA (System and Network Auditor) certification. In each case, I learned a lot in the process of becoming certified; the CCNA filled in some lower level networking knowledge gaps, the CISSP broadened my knowledge of security and forced me to learn about encryption, and the GSNA is giving me a better understanding of the role of auditing in security. As trite as it might sound, I believe you get as much out of any certification process as you put in.
That being said, there are a lot of certificates out there that don't take much effort to get, and are worth exactly the effort you expended to get them: not much. Which is why some members of the certification industry are pushing for standardization; they want to know that each certification program meets with minimum requirements and that everyone is testing in the same way. The theory is by standardizing the testing process it would make all certifications worth more. I'm more concerned that it would make it easier for 'cram session' companies more able to standardize their own training, which is one of the main issues that the testing companies are trying to avoid. Cramming to pass a test rather than than learning and understanding the subject matter lowers the value of the certificate for everyone.
The reality is, anyone who's been in IT for any length of time has horror stories about 'professionals' who are certified from here to Sunday, but can't really do the work when it comes to real life. We all know that certificates don't mean you know how to do anything; it means you've invested the time and effort in your career to get the certificate, nothing more. Hopefully you've learned something along the way, but certificates are really a way to get past the HR department and some of the basic questions than they are about actually proving your knowledge. They're designed to get you to the interview, rather than as a way to quickly get past the tough questions that should be asked in the interview.
I don't think certificates are useless, but too many people have the wrong expectations of their usefulness, especially entry level certs. If you use certifications as a gauge of the effort a professional has put into their career advancement, you'll find them useful. But if you're trying to use them as a benchmark of knowledge, expect the lowest common denominator necessary to pass the test. To paraphrase and old joke, what do they call a CISSP who barely passed his test? A CISSP.



