Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Robin Harris's picture
Robin Harris

Random Writes

Two-minute guide to Electronic Data Discovery

Let the fear-mongering begin: the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) requirements are changing effective December 1, 2006, with new requirements for electronic data discovery (EDD). Images of a pale and blinking CIO walking through phalanxes of shouting reporters and photographers may come to mind. But the reality is not so dire.

What is electronic data discovery?
In civil cases (non-criminal lawsuits mostly) judges want everyone prepared. The FRCP rules of discovery lay out the process by which both sides get to search each other's files looking for evidence that supports their case. It's an existing process extended to electronic information.

So what's new?
Not much. Most of the changes are technical and not scary at all, like including EDD planning in pre-trial conferences. If you like there is a short summary of the rules at UScourts.gov.

What's interesting?

  • Rule 34 acknowledges that "electronically stored information is explicitly recognized as a category . . . distinct from "documents" and "things." The courts recognize that computer information differs in three major ways from traditional documents:
    • Volume is often enormous.
    • The information is dynamic - easily overwritten, deleted or changed, often without anyone's specific direction or knowledge (BSOD, anyone?).
    • The information may be incomprehensible apart from the system that created or stored it.
  • Rule 37(f) is the IT department's friend. It offers "limited protection against sanctions . . . for a party's failure to provide electronically stored information in discovery." The limits are:
    • The data must be lost in the routine operation of an information system.
    • The operation of the system must be in good faith - which may mean modifying IT operations to preserve data that might be needed for pending or reasonably anticipated litigation.

Buy or cry?
Some vendors will try to use the new FRCP rules to spook customers into buying costly stuff. Don't fall for it. Here's what to do:

  • Your company's lawyers and record management folks are responsible for setting electronic data retention policy - not IT
  • IT must take the lead, working with policy makers, in architecting an economic and effective infrastructure to ensure compliance
  • IT needs a documented process whose ownership lies outside IT for unscheduled data destruction - such as when a VP wants all their emails to a client deleted - and staff must be trained on it.

If you want to know more check out this site. And relax, at least about EDD - you've got bigger problems.

What People Are Saying

Bill,

Bill,

There are changes, of course, and those changes are largely around how the lawyers deal with this stuff, not IT. It is easier for IT to pass on electronic copies than a couple of hundred boxes of paper, and being electronic it is easier to search. All in all, I find that reasonable and not an undue burden. Further, the "safe harbor" provision explicitly takes into account that electronic documents are subject to loss and/or alteration in the course of normal IT operations, as long as those are "good faith" operations.

You and I are in complete agreement on the approval issue I noted. IT should not allow itself to be placed in the position of passing on the legal legitimacy of either data retention policies are deviations from those policies. They do, however, need to take the lead in architecting an economic and workable solution.

Generally, a good two minute

Generally, a good two minute primer. However, I take serious issue with this statement:
"So what's new?
Not much. Most of the changes are technical and not scary at all, like including EDD planning in pre-trial conferences. If you like there is a short summary of the rules at UScourts.gov."

It reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of legal process that will bite your IT clients in the butt. Under the old rules, lawyers wrangled over whether or not an electronic document was a "data compilation" subject to disclosure. Now such disclosure is mandatory within 120 days of the start of the case. You can't disclose what you don't know your client has. This rule change shortens the timeline by 75%. The burden will fall on IT to find and preserve the stuff needed for disclosure and IT failure will lead to collateral damage, like Coleman vs. Morgan Stanley.

Second, the old print-to-image archive methodology won't work. The default format for acquisition, assessment, disclosure and subsequent production in discovery of 'electronically stored information' is ' as maintained in the ordinary course of business' ie: digital format. This is a sea change for law departments and outside counsel as well.

I also think thoroughly documenting a VP's unscheduled deletion request is a great idea, but probably not enough to aviod sanctions or an indictment in any jurisdiction with an overly-zealous prosecutor. Securing corporate security or law department approval as part of the 'documentation' process would be the hook on which I'd hang my defensibility hat.