Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

FCC boss: We can throw away the AT&T net neutrality agreement

The groundbreaking AT&T pledge to agree to net neutrality provisions in return for being allowed to buy out BellSouth carries absolutely no weight with FCC honcho Kevin Martin. In fact, Martin has said that the FCC "will oppose such policies going forward."

Last week, AT&T agreed to a variety of net neutrality provisions as a way to get Democratic FCC commissioners to allow it to buy BellSouth. Without those commissioners' votes, the FCC was deadlocked.

A variety of consumer groups hailed the agreement, and said that it could even serve as a blueprint for future net neutrality provisions.

But FCC boss Kevin Martin and fellow Republican commissioner Deborah Taylor Tate immediately squashed that idea. In a statement, they made clear that they believe the agreement was a bad one, and they'll do their best to fight net neutrality.

Their statement claims that the net neutrality provisions "are discriminatory, and run contrary to Commission policy and precedent."

The statement goes on to say, "while the Democrat Commissioners may have extracted concessions from AT&T, they in no way bind future Commission action...To the extent Commission action is required to effectuate these conditions as a policy going forward, we specifically do not support those aspects of the conditions and will oppose such policies going forward.

"For example, today's order does not mean that the Commision has adopted an additional net neutrality principle... although AT&T may make a voluntary business decision, it cannot dictate or bind government policy."

In other words, from Martin's point of view, nothing has changed. And his statement seems to imply that AT&T could back out of its promises and the FCC would take no action against it.

But there's one thing that Martin has overlooked: The Democratic Congress may pass legislation ensuring net neutrality. And then, whether he likes it or not, it will be the law of the land.

Related Opinion by Preston Gralla:

 

What People Are Saying

Perhpas its time for Kevin

Perhpas its time for Kevin Martin to move on. When Martin said that the FCC "will oppose such policies going forward." he spitefully ignored the wishes of the people. Indeed, the republican members of the commission have turned this into a political problem based on party politics rather than a victory for the consumer. Someone should tell Martin that he needs to abide by agreements made. If he doesn't, then he should be removed from his position.

Umm... hey genious you do

Umm... hey genious you do pay the phone companies, on both ends, to transport your calls. They are called access charges and they are billed by the local phone companies on both ends of the call to your long distance or local toll provider. They in turn charge you for that cost in your per minute rate or your flate rate service.

Anonymous -- Google doesn't

Anonymous -- Google doesn't ride free on anyone's networks. They pay for their network access just like anyone else does. By your logic, when I call someone on the phone, I should pay not only my phone company but I should also pay their phone company for the privilege of carrying my call to their subscriber.

See also Wednesday's IT

See also Wednesday's IT Blogwatch:
AT&T promises neutral tube series (and SfSS)

Preston -- one thing you

Preston -- one thing you overlooked....the President will veto any net neutrality bill that will favor the Google's of the world so they can free ride on other peoples network's.

Net neutrality is great,

Net neutrality is great, another way for consumers to benefit from free and open networks. But I fear nothing can remain "free" if government doesn't step in to protect us from the Teleco's myopic focus on profits. I hope ATT doesn't back out.

Net neutrality is crap,

Net neutrality is crap, another way for "consumers" to benefit from "free" networks. Nothing is free. I hope ATT does back out.