Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Big Brother's arm gets a lot bigger

If the Republicans get their way, ISPs will be required by law to track all of their customer's behavior, keep records of that behavior forever, and turn it over not only to law enforcment officials, but even to private lawyers in non-criminal cases such as divorces and employment disputes.

The new law is being proposed by Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the House Judiciary Committee's top Republican. It would let Attorney General Alberto Gonzales decide exactly what information should be kept by ISPs. Gonzales has shown time and time again to be a civil libertarian's worst nightmare.

What happened to a time when conservatives worried about the long arm of the federal government, decried privacy intrusions, and thought that the government had no business snooping into people's private lives?

As this bill shows, those days are long gone. The law, if approved, would be the worst intrusion invasion of privacy in cyberspace yet by the feds.

Unfortunately, the proposal also shows that stupidity is an equal-opportunity employer, because some Democrats are backing it as well. Colorado Rep. Diana DeGette, for example, favors this kind of law. Other Democrats have voted in the past for similar proposals.

Increasingly, more and more of our lives are being conducted online. This law hastens in a time when you have no online privacy, and whatever you do can be snooped on by the government, and even private lawyers. Congress should squash this bill, and fast.

What People Are Saying

ISP's have been tracking all

ISP's have been tracking all of our moves on the Internet for years. I am surprised that a person who has written about computers and technology for 20 years did not know this! (or if he did, he didn't express it in the article) I suspect it is yet another politically driven attempt to spread fear into the uninitiated. Make the Big Bad Republicans the evil fall guy and cause of everything that is wrong with society. I also doubt that Preston read the entire bill himself. It sounds like talking points from a political opposition. No serious piece of legislation is completely with out merit. If this is not a serious piece of legislation, than it is not worth writing about.
Lets face it, if you want to live in a bubble completely isolated, live in the street. Do not bank, buy anything unless you pay with cash in a dark alley or use technology in any way size or shape or form.

Our lives are an open book. We need to have and maintain privacy protections that protect the innocent individuals. The fact that many if not most of you didn't know that ISP's have tracked us for years is proof that these protections work. While I have not read the bill and do not know word for word what is in it (Preston did you) I am sure there are merits and problems with the bill. Lets offer suggestions on how to improve the bill. We need the ability to track and find those individuals that would do our society harm.

This article is just another politically motivated attack. It is a shame, Preston could do so much more. Preston, lets see some alternative solutions offered in your blog posts. Of course in order to do that you would have to read and understand the bills you are writing about. Stop the Whining and offer alternatives

I'm really getting tired of

I'm really getting tired of hearing that Bush stole the 2000 election. How did he steal it? What fraud did he commit (or direct others to commit)?

Continuing such rhetoric undermines the value of your other comments about big brother.

And note that a desire to become big brother is certainly not limited to President Bush or even the Republicans. It is clearly stated that plenty of Democrats support the bill and have voted for similar bills in the past.

I do agree that all this data tracking is a bad thing. But I'll let you in on a little (not) secret: many ISPs are already doing it! How do you think the RIAA was able to get the names of music downloaders/uploaders to sue? They had IP addresses; that information on a subpoena resulted in the ISPs providing the name/address of the customer...

First it was the IRS, then

First it was the IRS, then it was the war on drugs, then fighting the 911 terrorists, then the war on child pornography. Each one was only an excuse for the invasion of privacy. While each of these may have been a laudable goal, the actual invasion of privacy was in actuality the goal itself.

To paraphrase a couple of famous quotes - The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Or to put it another way: Those who give up their freedoms for safety will be neither safe, nor free.

The actual quote was, "Those

The actual quote was, "Those who would give up a little bit of freedom for more security are deserving of neither." Ben Franklin, I believe.

The people in this country

The people in this country are nothing but blind, scared sheep. Politicians always say these acts are to protect the children. Baloney!! It's all about controlling us.

This will pass, just like all the other Big Brother proposals since the decider stole the election in 2000.

Beside all the legal, moral and privacy issues, this is an economic disaster too.

ISP rates will skyrocket because they will need to add an endless string of disk space to archive all of this information.

I urge EVERYONE to call/write Lamar Smith and Trent Franks in AZ, he's a co-sponsor.
Franks hasn't seen a Big Brother proposal that he hasn't liked.

Wake up, people, before it's too late. If it's not already!! Write!! Call!!