Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Vista sales surging? Not so fast!

When Microsoft released a strong earnings report for the first quarter of 2007, it wasn't just the spike in revenues that was unexpected. The claims that strong Vista sales was a key driver of that earnings growth sounded a bit overblown - and I can give you six reasons why.

The operating system was only released to the consumer market in January. Enterprises have had it since last Fall, but they generally tend to adopt a new Microsoft operating system fairly slowly. Nonetheless, a story in Business Week, Vista Pays off for Microsoft, states that "...while some corporate customers still opt for the predecessor Windows XP when they buy new computers, for software compatibility reasons, a remarkably large number are taking the new operating system." That unattributed remark sounds like a reporter may have drunk too much of the Microsoft Kool-Aid.

Consumers, meanwhile, typically buy an operating system with a new PC. Analysts had been saying that PC sales growth, which had been slowing, was unlikely to see much if any increase from Vista. And Computerworld Windows expert Scot Finnie recently stated that readers of his newsletter for advanced users weren’t too interested in upgrading. Then there was Dell's recent decision to bow to consumer pressure and begin offering Windows XP again as an alternative to Vista. Add it all up and that doesn't exactly support the booming Vista sales theory.

So what's happening? Clearly, the Client division's numbers are up significantly. Windows sales appear to be up. But that doesn’t mean that Vista has hit one out of the park.

Here are six reasons why Microsoft’s spin on the numbers may be less than what it seems:

  • A substantial amount of product is still in the channel and not in end users’ hands. “There is a lag between the time an OS ships into the manufacturers, the channels, and retails, and the time it turns into a box and into living rooms and offices, says IDC analyst David Daoud.
  • Vista pre sales from the last quarter of 2006 were deferred to be taken in Q1 2007. That accounts for $1.2 billion of the Client group’s $5.2 billion in sales. This includes pre-purchases of the OS as well as machines that were sold with a free upgrade to Vista. Removing those revenues cuts down the quarter over quarter gain for the the Client business unit from 67% to 29%. That’s still quite respectable, but quite a bit lower.
  • An accounting change has inflated Windows revenues when compared to previous earnings reports. Until now, when Microsoft reported income from Windows it deferred 25% of the income over a 3 1/2 year period. “The accounting treatment reflected the costs of upgrades and other add-ons Microsoft provides over the life of the system,” according to a WSJ story. With Vista it’s taking the entire amount in the quarter in which it sells the product. In other words, Microsoft’s Windows earnings this quarter would have gone up 25% even if it sold the exact same number of Windows licenses as in the previous quarter for the same price. In a conference call comment picked up by the WSJ, Microsoft’s CFO predicted that this will trend income upward by $220 million for the current fiscal year. Microsoft’s fiscal year for Microsoft ends June 30th so that number represents two quarters of accounting-related income gains.
  • A vote for a PC is not necessarily a vote for Vista. Since most enterprises are unlikely to begin a mass migration to Vista, most early users will likely be consumers. Most consumers don’t go out and buy an operating system. It comes on their PC, and PC sales are up by 10.9% worldwide for the first quarter. While PC sales weren’t expected to see a bump from Vista’s release, the reverse may be true. “…yes, there was a small bump from Vista … but we don't think it necessarily translates into a major Vista adoption pattern that drives the market [for PCs],” says IDC’s Bob O'Donnell.
  • Corollary: What comes on the box doesn’t necessarily stay on the box. According to various reports in the news, Microsoft claims that three quarters or more of its Windows sales are Vista. When it comes to business users that doesn’t mean much. “A business purchasing new laptops or desktops today is getting Windows Vista... but they typically strip Vista off and re-image with Windows XP so the system fits into their corporate standard,” says IDC analyst Al Gillen.
  • Sales revenues aren’t the same as unit sales. Microsoft isn’t necessarily saying it’s selling a lot of copies of Vista. It is saying that with its new price structure it’s making a lot of revenue on the versions it does sell. The company claims to have sold more of the premium editions of Vista, which sell for up to twice the cost of the basic version.

So the tsunami of new Vista users may be more like a small wave.

What People Are Saying

Okay. But Vista uses at

Okay. But Vista uses at least 1gb of memory to run, as you say:"flawless..." So does an Apple! It's the same concept that perturbs me! Vista is Apple!

I do not understand people

I do not understand people being so anti-vista.

Oh wait, yes I do.. you are people who refuse to upgrade your hardware and sit on ancient processors.

If you have a Dual Core Processor and 2 gb of memory you should have no problem at all. Vista has ran flawless for the 30 days i've been on it and i have run into minimal complications.. just like all new OS it has a few teething problems but they are easy to sort and work out. And what is meant by cant do anything on vista? Everything works fine here.

XP didnt have 'teething

XP didnt have 'teething problems'. Vista is pathetic, since i got it it has had nearly one start up error a day, it needs custom software, doesnt play divx properly or .avi
When it came out of the box it had 15gb of memory used already

I have been a Windows user

I have been a Windows user since the first edition of Windows 95, still have the diskettes. Windows XP and the required activation drive me crazy, because I am always crashing the machine or changing the hardware. XP doesn't mind that, but will run out of auto activations and require you to call the mother ship and answer the question. "How many machines do you have Windows XP installed on". Not sure they even listen to the answer.
I bought Windows Vista Ultimate. Spent a considerable amount of money upgrading my machine. Tried both the 32 bit version and the 64 bit version.
The 64 bit version runs most of the operating system built in tools, like Internet Explorer and Windows Media Player, in emulation mode. In other words, there is a 64 bit version installed, but by default it runs the 32 bit version. What's up with that?
Long story short, Windows XP was a tremendous step forward for Microsoft, very stable OS that runs quickly. Windows Vista reminds me of Windows 3.1. You get the idea of what they intended, but is runs so poorly, it will drive you crazy. I removed it from my machine and tried Linux, again. I now recommend Linux for the casual user, that's right, if you just want email, the web and basic office software, it is the best choice, although it is wise to pay for the offered support services if you are not lucky enough to have someone that can help you. Linux has come a long way and is actually much more enjoyable to use that Windows. But if you need to use your machine for serious work, like writting commercial software and most of your required tools are windows based, you are pretty much stuck with XP.
I think Microsoft has made a very bad move with Vista. But they have enough money to pretty much "fix" anything. So after about Service Pack 3, it might be worth another look.

Keep your windows xp. You

Keep your windows xp. You cannot do anything on vista.

Having used Windows since v3

Having used Windows since v3 XP was a step too far with the restrictive activation. Two years ago I tried Linux but was not impressed so was stuck with Windows.

Along came Vista and I thought an upgrade would be a good idea but a trial of RC1 and the even worse activation made me decide to try Linux again.

Over the past three months I have tried various versions and now run a duel boot system with Suse and my other computer has Xandros on it. The third computer will trial the latest Madrake and Ubuntu. Yes I have found the fun in computing again. AS soon as I can find Linux programs to replace all my Windows ones then its goodbye Microsoft. Mind you Wine or Crossover may make that time come sooner!

I am not a Vista fan or any

I am not a Vista fan or any new before service pack operating system from the Borg (oops, Microsoft)I am using this time while we wait productively and am using the newest Ubuntu 7.04 release. Very impressive. An operating system with all your hard core apps attached and free to boot. What a concept. Are you paying attention Microsoft.

Any numbers that Microsoft

Any numbers that Microsoft releases regarding Vista sales are not accurate. My job is to sell Microsoft licensing to school districts for a Fortune 500 company and I sell a lot of Vista licensing--business has been very good lately. With that said, almost every license order that goes out has the installation media for XP attached, not the media kit for Vista. You see, Microsoft will only allow sales of their newest OS on their volume licensing programs for education, corporate, and government customers, but under that license you are allowed to legally install a previous version of the OS. The resulting sales figures show healthy Vista license purchases, but we know for a fact that it is XP and not Vista that is actually being installed.

I'm not a fan of Vista. I

I'm not a fan of Vista. I know my company won't be going to Vista until at least 2008. I have run into a few people who have Vista, and it doesn't work as well as XP. It's frustrating for someone to hear that even though they have a good working printer, they have to go buy a new printer, because their old one won't work with their new computer!

I recommend to all my clients that if they buy a new pc, even if it comes with Vista, they put XP on it.

I wouldn't be surprised if all other computer vendors gives in, and offers XP on their machines along with Dell. It's smart business, at this point.

Carl Howe over at Seeking

Carl Howe over at Seeking Alpha wrote an interesting piece in which he states:

"Microsoft has been drawing down its balance sheet over time. It stood at nearly $70 billion nine months ago. It was $66 billion at the beginning of the year. As of March 31, it's less than $64 billion."

So what does this mean?

"Microsoft achieved record breaking earnings during the Vista launch quarter by taking money out of its assets, not through amazing sales of Vista and Office."