Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

Pentagon: Social networking sites are off-limits

Soldiers, in the U.S. as well as in Iraq and other overseas locations, will no longer be allowed to use a variety of social networking sites such as YouTube, MySpace, and several others. The reason? Security concerns as well as bandwidth problems.

Sound familiar? It should. Those are the same reasons that many corporations don't particularly like social networking sites either. Of course, in the military such concerns are greatly magnified.

The Associated Press reports that the military is worried that when soldiers blog or post videos to YouTube they may inadvertently reveal information about military operations that can be used by the enemy. In addition, the sites are bandwidth hogs, and the Pentagon wants to devote its bandwidth to more important matters.

While there are obvious reasons why the Pentagon is doing this, there are some potential problems as well. The move follows on the heels of the Pentagon cracking down on bloggers. Some people believe that it's an attempt to blunt any criticism of the Iraq war.

In addition, Noah Shachtman, who a national security blogger for Wired Magazine, told the Associated Press that soldiers' blogs are an excellent weapon in the propoganda war, and that by cracking down on blogs, the U.S. could be hurting itself in the long run.

"This is as much an information war as it is bombs and bullets," he told the Associated Press. "And they are muzzling their best voices."

The upshot? There are clear reasons for the Pentagon move, but it should recognize it's creating problems as well as solving them.

What People Are Saying

Thank you Rick. I was a 12B

Thank you Rick. I was a 12B for 8 years, never had to go anywhere. I am glad that people like you are willing to do what is asked of you.

We all need to keep in mind that ours has been a Voluntary military for decades. None of these soldiers were dragged from their homes, handed a rifle and put on a plane. They chose to do this the same as I chose to do it for my 8 years.

I was never sent into a combat zone, I happened to fall in between Desert Storm and Enduring Freedom. If I had been sent, I would have gone. One thing I remember from basic training is the understanding that from the point you put on the uniform, you aren't a civilian any longer. Civilians have their laws but soldiers have a much stricter set of laws called the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Pretty much anything civilian law covers it covers, and much more. Essentially a soldier belongs to the military. There are no group votes on whether to take a mission or not, you just do it.

Do I feel bad that soldiers are losing access? Yes, but on the other side, my grandfather could barely get letters out of Europe to the rest of his family.

Get over yourselves and worry more about how we treat these guys when they get home.

Yes, long-term deployments

Yes, long-term deployments and the imminent threat of danger make for an uncomfortable situation, but the situation is temporary. And, yes, my fellow soldiers, who also share the same experiences and same dangers, sometimes are injured or killed while performing their duties. But we know why we're here -- we're here to keep the enemy here, away from the States, away from attacking our homes, family and country. And we don't want to be anywhere else at this moment in time, because we understand the importance of our presence here. If we're not here fighting the enemy, we will be fighting them on our own soil, barricaded in our own homes. It was quite plainly demonstrated in our country on September 11, 2001, what fanatical, unprincipled madmen will do to others when they have the opportunity.

Would you not spend a year in Hell, a far worse place than where we now stand, to save all of that which is precious to you? If not, I pity you for your lack of commitment and passion, for not having a cause in your heart worth defending to your last breath. We don't fight for the love of war, war being a horrid thing that is best avoided, but instead we fight for the love of peace. I do not pity those that will die and be maimed here on this battlefield, we who stand for our beliefs and our country and give all that we have. We know in our final moments that there is nothing more we can possibly do to protect those we love and protect, because we give all that we have in that defense. And we trust that our fellow soldiers will also do the same, and because of that, we know that our family, friends and country will be safe.

So I and my fellow soldiers give up smelling good, eating fancy meals and sleeping in late on Saturdays for a year or two to preserve our freedoms and way of life, so that we have a safe, free place to return home to. We'll even be doing the same for you as well, despite the fact that you may not appreciate our commitment. That's the greatest bargain I've ever made.

Let's stick a bunch of our

Let's stick a bunch of our guys in the middle of a civil war in Iraq, put them in life threatening situations without proper equipment and a severe lack of training, give them 3rd rate medical care after their lives are virtually destroyed due to catastrophic injuries, force them to do extended tours, and then take away their ability to communicate with the world outside of Iraq, and with their friends and family? They don't show that on the Army commercial...