Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


IT Blogwatch's picture
IT Blogwatch

A Daily Digest of IT Blogs from Richi Jennings

Hasta la Vista, Bill (and BOFH-style inventory disposal)

Hasta la Vista, Bill, says the eponymous company, founded in 1999. Founder John Wall (of Wall Data fame) is livid. Michael Hampton shakes his head, "You’d think someone would have noticed that company just down the street." Bart Xerocool quips, "Microsoft could really care-less as they get sued like everyday."

>> UK blogger "Annie" shrugs and says it...

may well not bother me, as this PC is less than a year old & I’m seriously thinking of going for a Mac next time around. [read more]

>>Alex Scoble is incredulous, asking what was wrong with "Windows 2006"?

I know that coming up with a product name is difficult, but if this is all that the biggest moneymaking machine on the planet, this side of the IRS, could come up with, we are in big trouble as a species. [read more]

>>Antonio Ortiz thinks Wall doesn't have a leg to stand on (assuming my Spanish is up to it):

In principle, no matter how much Microsoft can be criticized, I believe that in this dispute they are going to be more right than John Wall... It's very clear to me that Windows Vista and Wall's company are two different things and there is no overlap between an operating system and a services company... However, the boot's on the other foot this time: Microsoft should recall its confrontation with Mocosoft. [read more (in Spanish)]

>>Bill Quick fumes, "Do As We Say, Not As We Do":

How hard would it have been for mega-moneybags Gates and his company to negotiate a licensing deal with Vista? But no, they are MICROSOFT, and while they defend their own marks at the drop of a hat, they don't have to play by their own rules with anybody else. I hope Wall rips a big chunk out of their wallet. [read more]

>>Chris Camargo points out that it's up to Wall to be seen to protect his trademark:

Knowing very well how protective Microsoft is of its trademarks, I'm sure ol' John doesn't want to see himself get tangled into a lawsuit when Microsoft comes for him after the launch of the OS. Good luck with that, John. [read more]

>>Engadget notes that Wall is not alone:

Among the companies that could be affected by the new name are La Jolla, California, based Vista Software, and Warren, Ohio’s Vista Window Co., which makes, you guessed it, Windows. Somehow we suspect that, if any of these companies make a run at Microsoft, they’re going to face a reaction that makes Apple’s successful defense of the Tiger brand against Tiger Direct look meek by comparison. It’s Windows Vista, now and forever (or at least until Blackcomb comes out). Get used to it. [read more]

>>German blogger Sebastian Hirschmann asks,

Could it be, that Microsoft’s struggle to get patents on everything - including smiley creators - is finally turning on them again? Or will Microsofts [sic] response be to just buy Vista and make them shut up by that? [read more]

>>Lukasz Maciak first notes that "Višta" is Lithuanian for "Chicken" and then loses it, badly:

Come on people! It's Chicken! You are fighting over a chicken! This is silly! I have this mental image of lawyers playing tug of war with a rubber chicken! [read more]

Buffer overflow:

And finally... BOFH: Chuck it and leg it.

Richi Jennings is an independent technology and marketing consultant, specializing in email, blogging, Linux, and computer security. A 20 year, cross-functional IT veteran, he is also an analyst at Ferris Research. Contact Richi at blogwatch@richi.co.uk.

What People Are Saying

Vista? Hasta la... baby! It

Vista? Hasta la... baby! It would be nicer when Microsoft one day decides to brush up a rock stable version of their meanwhile 10 year old OS.

1. They meanwhile admitted they did not reach their goal of supporting older hardware. A 64 MB graphics card tugging the 1 gigaherz computer isn't such a bad idea, but not in trade for some transparent windowborders. I see thousands of small and medium companies investing hundreds of thousands of dollars upgrading their hardware, just to find out linux would have been for free.

2. Everything a coder codes, eventually ends up in the realms of the Windows OS. Eg: RSS! Sure, but we had coders releasing bugfree, final versions of good software for years... why integrate it into the operating system? Are they just plain stupid or don't they see (because of all those seperate coding teams) that it can and will make the OS more open for malicious attacks.Furthermore, why should coders keep on supporting Microsoft operating systems when they try to make a living out of finding and coding nifty software, Microsoft later steals and integrates without even caring about "copyright laws and international treaties". Next thing: playing with that shell? Where is the "speed and stability" factor? I don't need a litestep desktop shell that has been recoded by Microsoft just to produce more pixelspace-stealing windows on my screen. 99% of the time, I'm using an app fullscreen. I even switch between the proggies using alt-tab, so why a taskbar with an overloaded startmenu?

3. Could Microsoft please decide where their design experiences are going to lead to? I don't see myself updating my proggies every darn year just because "visual styles" and "PNG is the new icon format" comes along.

Bill, wanna scare your admins, your coders and in the end your users? Keep it up the way you're handling it right now - or change your company politics, dude! I once was a fan... a designer... a coder... a pro in the two worlds of pixels and bytes. Now I'm a neo-realistic technocrat, thinking of switching over to Linux. Why? The creators of linux don't rip off people! (well, most of the time that is).