Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Sharky's picture
Sharky

Shark Tank

Shark Tank: Another satisfied customer

Program director goes on vacation, returns a week later and calls this netadmin pilot fish a few days after that. "I have odd e-mails about 'undeliverable mx-exchange' on here," he tells fish. "Do you have any idea why I would get these?"

Are you sending e-mail to addresses that don't exist? fish asks. "I don't think so," PD says. "Don't worry about it; let me double-check and make sure."

A week later, fish gets word that the PD has called the IT director: "Hey, I'm still getting these crazy e-mails. Your network administrator isn't doing anything. Let me forward one to you."

IT director forwards the sample to fish, who figures out it's undeliverable and an internal e-mail, but for some reason, it doesn't show the actual address.

Fish calls the PD. Could you be sending e-mail to someone who has resigned? "No, I use my own lists that I created."

So fish goes to the PD's desk to see the list -- 500 names of people in call centers up and down the coast. Fish points out that PD likely wouldn't be notified if any of them quit or resign. PD insists that fish call the supervisors to make sure the addresses are good.

It takes half a day, but fish tracks them down and confirms that the list contains only active employees.

"Program director calls the CIO to tell him I still haven't done anything, that I'm incompetent, and that our IT department is a useless cost center," says fish. "CIO calls me and asks for a status update. I answer that I'm still confirming the list for the program director."

Finally, PD calls to tell fish he's noticed something: He's getting the returned e-mails even when he doesn't send any out. Consistently, every hour. For the past four days.

Fish returns to PD's desk and looks at his in-box. Sure enough, the call center phone system is e-mailing him every hour with a summary. The "From" line changes with each message, because it encodes the date and time.

And when it hits the PD's mailbox, it triggers the PD's auto-reply vacation message.

"I turn off the program director's vacation message," fish says. "As I'm leaving, I e-mail the CIO from my BlackBerry that the problem was fixed.

"On my way out, the secretary who sits just outside his office stops me and asks me a quick question. Program director shuts his door and takes a call on speakerphone from the CIO. I couldn't make out the words, but I could hear the tone -- the CIO was furious.

"I haven't gotten any requests for assistance from the program director since."

Deliver your true tale of IT life to me at sharky@computerworld.com. I'll send you a sharp Shark shirt if I use it. You can also add comments by using the form at the bottom of this page.

See more Shark Tank stories at the Sharkives.

Join Shark Bait

Now you can post your own stories of IT ridiculousness. Join Shark Bait today and vent your IT frustrations to people who've been there.
Go to the
Shark Bait homepage
or
Post a story now

What People Are Saying

Floundering here! It's

Floundering here! It's Monday!

Carp! I don't have anything

Carp! I don't have anything witty or insightful to say!

;-)

While we don't have all the

While we don't have all the particulars, it does seem that tech support might have done a bit more research right up front. I deal with undeliverables on a fairly regular basis and I need to see the real, original bounce; not have it forwarded to me losing the headers in the process. Also I inspect the server log so I can see the conversation between the client and the MX. Diagnosing SMTP problems is not terribly difficult, but internal non-deliverables can be amazingly difficult to diagnose.

With regard to the question

With regard to the question about why the PD was getting bounces when the problem was his out-of-office autoreply: The autoreply will try to reply to the "from" line (or embedded reply-to if any) which we are told contains a datestamp -- or in other words, you *cannot* reply to it.

For this reason, all auto-emailing devices (scanners for instance) should use a real email address as their "from".

Don't go off topic, whatever

Don't go off topic, whatever you do. They might [gasp] [whisper]censor you[/whisper]. :-)

To: CoffeeLover Re:

To: CoffeeLover
Re: Cavemen

Agreed - playing the PC card would not have made for a lasting format. However, the cavemen scaring people then wondering why they aren't accepted into mainstream society wouldn't last long either. I just felt like there was an opportunity to make light of some stupid stereotypes.

I'd love to give some examples, but it's a bit off topic.

PD was the cause of the

PD was the cause of the problem. But, fish really fell down on the job in efficiently researching, identifying and fixing the problem. We are always going to have the PEBCAK issues, but knowing that we should be on our toes to be smarter than the fools we deal with. Fish needlessly wasted lots of time on this one. Bad fish! Bad, bad, bad! :-)

glug...glug... I'm a

glug...glug...
I'm a fish.
glug...glug...glug

The ancient egyptians reused

The ancient egyptians reused papyrus and animal skins like JIM's broads. Once they reviewed their bank statement, they just scraped off the writing and sent aunt Jenny, residing in the promised land, a letter telling her how irritating all the frog and locust plagues were.

To Anonymous (for obvious

To Anonymous (for obvious reasons)

Re: Caveman

Love the commercials, knew the TV show would be a train wreck.

I do agree with you that the show missed an opportunity to be a hit, but NOT by following the concept that you state... the whole concept of the cavemen is so outrageous that an over the top NON-PC, NON-ISSUE based show is the only way it would have made it... Making it into an "issue showcase" would have been another ratings loser IMHO.

The draw of the cavemen is the comedy factor... not any "message" (in fact if anything the humor is based on MAKING FUN of all of the hyper-sensitivity).

Also, if you wanted to make a show about immigrants in America, don't you think that show would show the opportunities and success that can be achieved here if they work hard and enthusiastically adopt their new country? Isn't THAT the true "trials and tribulations" of immigrantรขโ‚ฌโ„ขs and minorities in mainstream America and not the over-hyped occasional incidents of discrimination that EVERYONE faces regardless of their citizenship status?