Ads by TechWords
Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

New report: U.S. broadband is still a miserable failure

The latest broadband figures from the international organization the OECD are out, and once again, they show the U.S. trails most of the industrial world when it comes to broadband penetration --- we're an anemic 15th place, with broadband penetration of 22.1 percent. The world winner Denmark has more than 34 percent penetration.

The numbers are getting worse, not better. The U.S. increase in broadband growth came in at a dismal 19th place, trailing Greece. But hey, let's not complain --- we beat Turkey!

Everywhere you look, there's bad news. When it comes to broadband speed, for example, we're a lowly 19th place, with an average advertised speed of 8.86 Mbps. Contrast that with Japan, with a whopping 93.69 Mbps average speed.

All this is cause for concern because broadband is an engine of economic growth and innovation. The further we fall behind, the most likely that our economy will suffer, and that others will catch up. Don't look to the federal government for help -- it won't even admit there's a problem, much less do anything about it. Just this week, the FCC once again issued its usual broadband whitewash, claiming that everything is hunky-dory. But that's only because the numbers it uses are bogus. It claims, for example, that any speed over 200 Kbps is broadband.

There's a lot more wrong with the FCC report as well. More on that, though, in a future blog. The point here is that we're falling further behind the rest of the world in broadband, and ultimately we'll pay the price for it.

What People Are Saying

Rate this
Rated -9
163 Votes

SpeedMatters does not show the real speed

The SpeedMatters map for Nebraska makes it look like Nebraska has been forgotten when it comes to broadband deployment ... When 99.98% of all people living inside the city limits of all 532 incorporated communities (Many communities with under 100 and even under 50 population) have the availability of access to broadband at speeds of 6Mbps and higher. Pricing 3Mbps $24.95 per month and 6Mbps $29.95 per month. AND 86% of all farmers and ranchers have availability of broadband access to the Interent at 6Mbps and higher. DSL has been extended to the majority of the rural areas with fiber to remote units within 1 1/2 mile of the farm and ranch homes. All of the DSL providers are ready when the market is ready to increase their bandwidths to 20 to 40 Mbps. Fiber to the premise has been completed in several communities and underway in many more. Fiber directly to ranch and farm homes will be completed in several communities this summer. Your speed measurement process is seriously flawed in that even if a higher local speed is in service, in most of our State, no one has placed a call to your server. Or of the calls placed to your server using a 3,6 or 10Mbps local connection gets to your server it might test as 512Kbps because of congestion in the nation wide network. You make some good points but your data in no way portrays reality.

Thx for the opportunity to comment - Roger Hahn

Rate this
Rated +24
330 Votes

The premise of your

The premise of your arguement is somewhat flawed because most, if not all, of the countries ahead of the US on the list are geographically small and many still have largely government subsidized telco markets. I have lived in Germany and in the UK and when you have dense population pockets - i.e. everyone lives in apartments or terraced (attached) houses - then you reach more of a market for every dollar spent on infrastructure. The population of France is nearly 300% that of Texas, but France is only 80% the size Texas. That density tends to skew the statistics to support your point, however it prevents you from painting a realistic scenario.

And by the way, I agree with your points on the impact of broadband, however I consider myself a "realist" so it is important to me that people understand why things are the way they are.

Rate this
Rated +19
307 Votes

We might make some headway

We might make some headway if the ISPs were required to advertise the minimum speed and the average speed for connections, and prohibited from advertising the theoretical maximum speed.