Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Angela Gunn's picture
Angela Gunn

Pushing Buttons

Your Homeland Security tax dollars at work

Security to a great extent involves the use of good judgment and good observation skills. So what do we make of the Department of Homeland Security doofus who thought it would be The Thing To Do to show up at the agency Halloween party in blackface? And what do we make of the panel that gave said doofus an award for this costume?! Is there a DHS Agency for Minstrelsy Defense? Are they so hard up for employees over there that they're hiring time travelers from the 1890s? And what are we to make of the spokesbot who said that "These kinds of things, incidents, happen all the time, so we handle them on a case-by-case basis?" Does this mean people are wandering the halls of DHS in blackface on a regular basis? And how did costume-party judges -- including Julie Myers, the assistant secretary overseeing Homeland Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement division -- look directly at the guy and not notice?

Yes, it could be worse -- we learn today in fact that over 110 contract employees at Chicago's O'Hare airport were using forged badges to access allegedly secure areas of the airport. One of the workers told investigators that he was pointed by representatives of Ideal Staffing Solutions to a box of assorted badges and told to find one with a photo that "looked like him"... and again, no one seemed to notice.

Maybe they're still too busy protecting TSA head Kip Hawley from plastic bags and Sharpies to be bothered. In that case, what's Julie Myers' excuse? If you've passed through U.S. Customs lately you're quite clear that the lady isn't distracted by repairing that system -- isn't it bad enough to have wafted into DHS under a should-have-been-crushing cloud of nepotism without adding more emissions to the atmosphere?

What People Are Saying

Jiyu, perhaps AG engaged in

Jiyu, perhaps AG engaged in hyperbole... but the actual costume is IMHO worse, in simply darkening his skin he made his pushing of a stereotype more "realistic"

And which is worse racism? or the fact that we have people stupid enough to do things that easily "mistaken" for racism in positions of federal authority?

Personally, i'd rather deal with an honest bigot than someone that freaking stupid.

Blackface: It's not just about cork anymore

Hi MFH -- thanks for chiming in. (So what do you think of the new blog format?) Yeah, I'll admit I paused slightly before going with "blackface" to describe what this idiot did, since we have as a culture a pretty clear image of blackface -- heavy cork, white outlines exaggerating features, Al Jolson / Bert Williams.

But I went with it, because (and now we delve into my history-of-American-popular-music obsession) as with the corking-up (aka blacking up) of yore, what this guy did when he "darkened" was a performance, and specifically a performance of an assortment of racial stereotypes connected to skin color. The blackface performers in the minstrel shows purported to be acting like "real" [we'd say black folk or African Americans, but other words were used then], but by and large of course it was pure hokum. (One of the things that fascinates me about Bert Williams, in fact, is that he was a man who was in part of African descent, who found no congruence nor reality in the awful stereotypes he saw in blackface performances, but who ended up working in blackface and trying, even succeeding to some extent, to infuse it with our common humanity. Amazing man. I digress.)

Anyway, blackface was something performers did to indulge an array of stereotypes for the amusement of onlookers, springing from an era when stereotyping was a major, major part of pop culture. Irish? Jewish? Italian? Greek? Hawaiian? Japanese? Chinese? Native American? Ruthlessly stereotyped on stage and in song -- and not just in the lyrics but very, very often in looks. One didn't apply the burnt cork for those, but there were other visual "cues," so to speak. Same stuff, different target.

And so we have a guy who wants to communicate a set of stereotypes. Obviously he dressed a certain way (or he wouldn't have won his contest); I wouldn't be surprised to hear that he affected an accented speech; maybe he carried props or the name to make it clearer what he was supposed to be costumed as. And he corked up -- maybe not so much as to indicate "Dahomenian," as our Mr. Williams would have had it, but that wasn't what this doofus was pretending to be. The shade varies, but the semantic intent remains the same.

The only thing that changes is that it's been about 90 years since we as a culture have found blacking-up an even REMOTELY acceptable thing to do. I reiterate the initial point: Dude's an idiot. (I mean the guy in the initial post, not Jiyu the commenter -- hard to hate on anyone who just gave me an excuse to talk about Bert Williams and semantic intent for 15 minutes!)

The writer should take the

The writer should take the time to read the news report she referenced (with a web link) - if she had, she would have noted that the costumed employee in question was NOT wearing "blackface," but rather simply was wearing makeup; darker than his natural skin color, yes, but close enough to it that the difference wasn't noticable by most of those who saw him. It's not unusual for someone in costume to wear theatrical or consumer makeup, so if that were all, there would have been no problem. The problem was with the rest of the costume - dreadlocks and prison stripes, which suggests to some a stereotype of African Americans being criminals. Had a black person worn the same costume, or even one with straight hair and light-hued makeup (suggesting a caucasian criminal), there would have been no outcry from the public. However, apparently the employee was white, which makes his inept costume choice a politically incorrect no-no. I suspect the employee's choice of costume was not at all motivated by racism (and that people really need to lighten up); but in this age of political correctness, it was certainly thoughtless and tasteless.