Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Novell vs. Red Hat: Linux vs. Linux

If you think about where Linux is fighting for market and mind-share, chances are you're thinking about Linux slugging it out with Microsoft Windows or Sun Solaris on the server, or trying to tear desktop customers away from Windows, and to a far lesser extent, from Mac OS X. That's all true, but there's also fierce competition between Linux distributions.

Some of that conflict is inside baseball stuff. Some Debian developers, for example, are jealous of Ubuntu's popularity and some developers feel that Ubuntu hasn't done enough for Linux. Unless you're a Linux insider this kind of stuff isn't going to matter to you.

What is going to matter to everyone who buys and deploys operating systems is that Novell is heating up its competition with the number one Linux distributor: Red Hat. On November 11th, Novell announced a new subscription and support program "designed to aid customers making the transition from their existing third-party Linux distribution to SLES (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server)." What makes this interesting is that the three-year SLES subscription under this plan also includes two years of technical support for a customer's existing Linux deployments while they make the SLES transition.

That's new. I can't recall ever seeing a vendor offering to support the competition's offering while helping you to transition to their product. It does make sense. This is Linux after all. There are a lot of differences between how Novell handles management with its ZENworks and Red Hat does the same jobs with its Red Hat Network, but underneath the top-level management tools a good Linux administrator won't have any trouble running either SLES or RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux).

Novell claims that this "new program is in response to growing customer demand for help as they make the strategic decision to transition their data center Linux infrastructure from existing third-party distributions, such as Red Hat Enterprise Linux and CentOS, to SUSE Linux Enterprise Server." In a statement, Novell's Justin Steinman, vice president of Solution and Product Marketing, said, "As the Linux market matures, we are increasingly being approached by customers who want to move to SUSE Linux Enterprise, attracted by Novell's award-winning support, superb interoperability in mixed-source environments, and by our support for mission critical applications. This new program makes it even easier for these customers to make the move to Novell." This program is already available today from Novell sales.

I honestly haven't seen that many RHEL or CentOS customers wanting to switch to anything else myself, but I have met some, just as I've met SLES users who were moving to RHEL, or its low-cost clone CentOS. Novell goes on to claim that in "a customer study conducted by independent research firm Lighthouse Research, Novell gained top ratings for overall support, and significantly outpaced Red Hat and Oracle Linux on both timeliness of phone support and support of mixed platforms, open source and proprietary software."

I've used both Novell and Red Hat support. Frankly, they're both good, and I can't call one better than the other. I will say, however, that I've found both Red Hat and Novell to do a better job than Oracle Linux support team. There is one area, where Novell does do a better job than Red Hat. Novell refers to it cautiously as "mixed platforms," "proprietary software," and "superb interoperability in mixed-source environments." What they're really talking about is that, thanks to Novell's Microsoft partnership, Novell SLES does a better job of working in tandem with Windows Server 2003, 2008 and related server/network services like AD (Active Directory).

Joint Windows/Linux support is something that a lot of businesses need. That said, Novell working hand-in-glove with Microsoft doesn't go over at all well with many Linux users. Boycott Novell, after all, which serves as the lightning rod for resentment against Novell and Microsoft working together, is a very popular site.

Be that as it may, Novell, which has profited from its Microsoft relationship, is planning on making even more from it by going after other Linux business contracts rather than Linux's traditional growth market of Unix and Windows Server shops. I'm going to be very interested in seeing how it plays out and what Red Hat will do in response to Novell's aggressive moves.

What People Are Saying

Linux community it's own worst enemy

the ego's in the Linux / Open Source community is the communities worst enemy. Everyone has to have their OWN / BEST distribution. If it's not their distribution it sucks.

over 1000 distributions doesn't help the Linux community make any inroads into business. Business needs stability and Linux is anything but stable. Distributions come and go. The hot distribution this week is next weeks trash. Developers jump around solving one problem here and another over there but never have a good look at the broad picture that the business exec must see. Give the exec something that solves many problems long term and they will adopt, but not until.

The instability in the Linux market and the sniping between Linux nerds drives them away. Either Linux nerds unify or Linux is condemmed to be a niche player forever.

144 Words

And not one of them true. It's not bad fiction though.

Killer Linux GUI needed for Mass Market

Once one of these distributors (Novell, RedHat, Ubuntu, etc.) can come out with a good desktop gui for the mass market to switch to Linux, we will have some competition with Microsoft (and Apple). Apple has done a great job with putting a great gui on top of FreeBSD, why aren't the Linux distributors working with Apple instead of Microsoft?

Personally, as a long time UNIX/Linux programmer, as well as Microsoft (before DOS had a number behind the name), I like Linux and any UNIX-like OS. I would love to switch my own computers completely over, but I have to worry about the other users in the house that need the comfort of Windows. So, to all you Linux geeks who spend your late night hours writing code while the rest of us are in bed, get cracking and put together that Killer Linux GUI.

That's an old one.

"Make the GUI like Windows and the users will beat a path to your door". Horse hockey. The first rule to remember when switching over to Linux is: Linux is not Windows. Another way to state it would be: I want Windows but I want it without the malware infections, DRM, WGA and a UAC with an attitude. No doubt there is room for improvement in the Linux GUI but that's the case for every OS. The desktops on Linux were not created by a marketing company, they were created by users. I can't imagine a better way to develop a GUI.

It's the applications, stupid

In terms of attracting new users to Linux, the differences among different distributions of Linux desktop are less important than the problems all flavours of Linux have in running the applications Windows and Mac users don't want to do without.

yeah yeah

uhh hahah hahah uhhh hahaha
-Fight fight!!!!
-Shut up Beavis!!!

-

Makes sense

In the current climate it makes sense for Novell and Red Hat to merge, creating a company which would be better resourced to take on M$ and reduce some of the Linux market fragmentation

Let's create one big Linux, Inc.

That's just what Microsoft would want. Imagine where we'd be if that happened in 2000.

Where else?

Novell is in a partnership with Microsoft that precludes them from taking marketshare from Windows so where else are they going to go? The Unix to Linux market is not one that is easily migrated and Novell has no consulting resources capable any longer. The Unix to Linux low-hanging fruit has already been migrated (mostly to RH).

Novell continues to struggle to improve the partner base expertise and mindshare so this is all they have to prop up service margins.

I don't see Novell executing on this any better than they have executed on anything else.

It's business.

Yes it would be nice if Linux companies would focus on taking on non-Linux competitors but that isn't practical or realistic.

It is interesting the mention of Novell's support in mixed environment being slightly better than Red Hat's. This exemplifies the difference in their two approaches to non-FOSS and proprietary software.

Novell has focused more on interoperability and working with Microsoft even before the Novell-MS deal.

Red Hat has been more FOSS-focused. Actually I am not sure about Red Hat exactly but poking around Fedora and CentOS and the verbiage used on their sites when referring to proprietary and non-FOSS reveals their overall philosophy.

Should Red Hat abandon it's FOSS-centric ideology? I'm not so sure about that. I'm just pretty sure that Novell is going to work that chink in their armor but Red Hat is smart and I would definitely not underestimate them.