Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


OLPC to Intel: Get lost

Intel's abrupt resignation from the OLPC board this week is an ominous sign for the future of Nicholas Negroponte's One Laptop per Child Project.

Intel's marketing clout and economies of scale could have helped the project keep skyrocketing costs for the now $200 laptop under control, as I've mentioned before (One laptop per child: Built for failure)

But control issues appear to be what lead to the divorce.

Negroponte's demand that Intel discontinue its own low-cost laptop forced the chipmaker to make a choice between its own business and its interest in helping OLPC. That was a mistake. Absolute positions seldom lead to the kind of compromise necessary to move forward.

Is there more to it than that? We don't know the full story at this point, but OLPC President Walter Bender Bender said there were other issues with Intel, including "a complete lack of cooperation by Intel on software, learning, etc."

He said, she said not withstanding, the lack of cooperation between the two parties does not bode well for the future success of the XO laptop. OLPC had much more to gain by keeping Intel in the fold than Intel did in joining the project.

The biggest loser in all this, however, will be OLPC's customers in developing countries: The world's economically disadvantaged children. Both Intel and OLPC have let them down.

 

 

What People Are Saying

Capitalism vs. Non-Profit

Of course the project can't be worthwhile if it doesn't come from the Big C -- Capitalism, better know as the Military/Industrial/Governmental Complex.

Capitalism will make sure OLPC doesn't succeed, using tried-and-true, corrupt methods, including threats and bribes. No non-profit can compete with that.

And, of course, it's the people who will suffer. Developing countries will end up getting fewer, more expensive, inferior computers. But the obscenely rich of the world will get richer.

Reminds me of the destruction of public transportation in the US by Big C, lead by GM, which ripped out over 100 streetcar systems nationwide by 1950.

OLPC - Doomed from the start

Negroponte is likely well intentioned with this project, but all he has really accomplished is a lot of gallant press releases and noble ideals. And unfortunately persuading organizations like Google to join this losing cause when they should be more careful where they donate. The cost barrier for developing countries ($100M), the questionable return on education value, and the very obvious fact that theft would be more likely around 50% (our kids occasionally get mugged for the peanut butter sandwiches we give them), made this project an idea that should have been considered and rejected. Now all this high-profile technocrats' backbiting is just putting the final nails in the coffin. Of course the OLPC will fly to Vegas on money donated as a means of helping poor communities, and they will put on a show, but the lack of orders will continue. This is yet another example of why poverty continues to perpetuate while high profile and rich organizations waste money on self aggrandizing ventures. Real progress will come when they are ready to support the very hard work of teaching kids reading, writing, math, science, personal accountability, self-esteem, values and responsibility. This will not happen with a laptop of any price.