Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


On to New Hampshire: Will Internet traffic there predict winner?

As we continue to track the effects of a candidate’s Web 2.0 efforts on the race for the White House, it is interesting to take a look at how accurate some of the predictions for the Iowa Caucus were based on Internet traffic in that state. And it is a good time to take a look at how traffic in New Hampshire is lining up behind the various candidates as a possible predictor of the outcome for the nation’s first primary on Jan. 8.

On the night before Thursday’s caucus in Iowa, Hitwise measured the volume of traffic the candidate Web sites were receiving from Iowa and ranked those sites among the top 100 political Web sites based on traffic for the previous four weeks ending on Jan. 3.

According to Hitwise, Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) web site logged the most traffic in Iowa, which corresponded to his big win there among the Democratic candidates. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) ranked just behind Obama, according to the Hitwise statistics (although in actuality she fell just behind former Sen. John Edwards in the caucus results).

Rep Ron Paul (R-Tex.), who has had the largest online presence of any candidate in the race and has mastered online fund-raising with his grassroots supporters, pulled in the most traffic, Hitwise said, followed by former Gov. Mike Huckabee (who was the night’s big winner for the Republicans).

But as Computerworld noted in our article looking at the candidates’ use of Web 2.0 tools leading up to the Iowa Caucus, Paul’s use of various online tools has resulted in monumental fund-raising efforts, but may not have been connected enough to the campaign to translate into offline activities that resulted in getting the votes needed to surpass others in his party. Huckabee, on the other hand, has been more successful in prompting online supporters to help organize offline events that had more potential to generate votes, according to sources for that story.

As far as traffic in New Hampshire goes, as of the four weeks leading up to Jan. 3, Hitwise noted that Obama still led the pack, followed by Clinton on the Democratic side. But on the Republican side, Sen. John McCain (R.-Ariz.) led the Republicans as far as traffic from New Hampshire, followed by Huckabee and then Paul. Edwards and former Gov. Mitt Romney rounded out the top seven candidates as far as traffic from New Hampshire.

It will be interesting to see which candidates come out on top in New Hampshire and match that back to their varying efforts of tapping into the Web 2.0 world.

 

What People Are Saying

Thanks

Very interesting and usefull. It helped me in work. Thanks.

Web Support vs Real Support

Web support vs real support is the issue. In Iowa, broadband coverage followed support for Barack Obama and Ron Paul. This is key for New Hampshire has good broadband coverage so we can finally see if web support follows real support.

If the Republicans want to win this election something has to change. The agenda they are offering is not motivating Republicans to give money to their candidates and that is a hard fact.

Hillary raised $100 million in 2007 ($20 Million Q4) by herself without breaking a sweat. When you add in Obamas $100 million in 2007 ($20 million Q4), you start to realize that all of the Republicans in the third quarter raised half as much as the Democrats. Huckabee is leading the polls but only has $2 million in the bank ending Q4. That lack of funding will not win an election against Hillary or Obama.

Ron Paul was able to entice 130,000 voters to give him $20 million in the last 3 months. And from the recent announcement from the Clinton Campaign, Paul is the first Republican to match Clinton in fund raising. The other Republicans better stop looking at the polls and start figuring out what part of the Paul message they can use to raise real money from real voters or they will lose the general election in November.

The question that no one is asking is why are the other Republican candidates not having 130,000 people giving them money?

We see a CNN Poll of 377 people that still use land lines and they announce Huckabee has taken the lead? Lots of real people giving real money is what is important now. Hillary and Obama have both. Obama reported 472,630 unique doners. This was good for Iowa and should hold true in New Hampshire. Some idiots believe the Democrats are giving money to Ron Paul to split up the Republicans. If that is true then they are missing the real point which is the Democrats are outspending the Republicans three to one!

The bigger problem is that not very many real people gave money to the other Republican candidates. Romney giving himself money does not represent real voters. Guiliani raising $11 million in Q3 from 5,000 people giving the maximum amount of $2,300 will not convert into a meaningful number of votes in the general election either. Lots of people, giving real money, will win the election.

The Republicans are fighting a loosing battle this time around if they don’t change some messaging now and start generating real money from real voters. Right now the Republican voters can not tell the candidates apart and based on their contributions are very excited about any of the candidates.

The math don’t lie.

Go to the Federal Election Commission Website and see for your self.