Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

OpenOffice 3 review: Who needs Microsoft Office?

I've just put the beta of OpenOffice 3 through its paces, and found that the office suite can do just about anything that Microsoft Office can do, supports a wide variety of formats...and, of course, is free. Given all that, who needs Microsoft Office?

I reviewed the Windows version of OpenOffice 3. The 147.9 MB download comes with six applications: the Writer word processor, Calc spreadsheet, Impress presentations program, Base database program, Math equation editor, and Draw graphics program. Even at a more than 147 MB download, though, it's still svelte compared to Microsoft Office.

Keep in mind that this is an early beta, and the program isn't expected to be ready until September. It's buggy, so don't use it in a production environment.

For most of what you use an office suite for, you'll find that OpenOffice 3.0 will more than fill your needs. Whether you're creating documents, spreadsheets, or presentations, all the basics, and much more is here. There's excellent formatting tools, mail merge, macros, solid charting tools, and the ability to easily create presentations.

An excellent new addition is the Start Centre, pictured below. It lets you easily create a new document, or open an existing one --- just click the proper icon. The Start Centre only appears if you don't currently have an OpenOffice application opened. Once you've opened an application, you can create or open a document by right-clicking the OpenOffice icon in the system tray, and making the appropriate choice.

OpenOffice 3.0 Start Centre

Particularly useful is that OpenOffice now handles a wide variety of formats, including the upcoming OpenDocument Format (ODF) 1.2 standard, and will also be able to open documents created in Microsoft Office 2007 and Office 2008 for the Mac, which means that it's about as universally useful as an Office suite can be. It can also export files to PDF format. Mac users will be pleased to know that it can run on Mac OSX without having to use X11.

The OpenOffice wizards are especially useful, and walk you through tasks such as creating databases and presentations. Experts won't need them, but everyone else will most likely welcome then. You can see and Impress wizard in action below.

OpenOffice 3.0 Impress

One drawback is the program's stodgy, dull-looking overall interface. It's functional, but not more than that. And it's certainly not nearly as useful as the Microsoft Office 2007 ribbon. The screenshot below shows Writer in action. It's good that it now supports displaying multiple pages on screen. But overall, using this program feels like a trip back to the 1990s.

OpenOffice 3.0 Writer

OpenOffice also doesn't support some of Microsoft Office 2007's higher-end features, such as Quick Parts. And there's very few templates, backgrounds, and layouts. And if you work in an enterprise that's standardized on Microsoft Office, you won't find the program of much use.

But if you can live without a few high-end features that most people don't use, and don't mind not having plenty of templates, you'll find OpenOffice 3 a winner. There's no need to pay top dollar for an office suite, when there's a free one, just waiting to be downloaded.

By the way, I'll have a more complete review running in Computerworld soon.

For more details about the beta, and to download it, click here.

Like this blog? Subscribe to the RSS feed!

What People Are Saying

Who needs Microsoft Office?

Who needs MS Office?
Anyone who wants to print documents correctly (even with an HP printer which OO supposedly works with).All my other applications print just fine but not OO.
Anyone who wants to share spreadsheets with users who have MS Office. Lots of financial & engineering functions created in MS office don't work in OO.
Anyone who wants to print labels. Many avery label templates don't work in OO.
Anyone who wants to share Power Point/Impress documents with MS Office users. The colors & some formatting do not display the same.
I keep running into more projects that are easy with MS Office but are time consuming or impossible in OO.
I have the default save settings set to MS format but it still doesn't help when trying to shar documents with others.

That's odd, I use OO on all

That's odd, I use OO on all the computers I support and have never had an issue.

The issue about file sharing between MS Office apps and OO is more about changing your default save formt in OO, though Microsoft is supposed to change this soon.

As for the engineering functions, the engineers I've worked with don't use Excel, regarding it as a piece of crap (they used specialized apps instead). The chemists I've worked with wouldn't have had a problem either as they only used basic multiplication in it on the spreadsheet functions. But they may be exceptions to the rule, as these people were in research.

Funny. MS products get

Funny. MS products get bashed, no matter how good they are. Office 2007 (and office 2008 for Mac) is widely regarded as a huge improvement over previous versions by both professionals and home users. Ofcourse some are not satisfied, but the day every single person will like any given product will never come.

"Microsoft feels the need to constantly re-invent the weel".

Another statement that makes me laugh. MS gets bashed when they release a product that isn't revolutionary (like Vista, some people think it's just a graphical update, i disagree but that's another discussion). Then they release a product that is different from top to bottom... and all of a sudden they have gone too far.

The community is always complaining and will do so as long as MS will exist. Supporting a huge company like MS isn't "cool" and will never be. No matter what product they produce.

Office 2007, an improvement?

I disagree MS Office is a step backwards from previous versions of MS. Where is my selection to go back to the classic view? Why does it not have PDF support by default, whereas OpenOffice has export to PDF support built in? Until MS fixes these problems, I will never like their new office suite. Office 2008 still has a menubar to use as well as a bit different interface and I like how I still have the menubar.

"And if you work in an

"And if you work in an enterprise that's standardized on Microsoft Office, you won't find the program of much use. "

It always suprises me when people in tech blogs make comments like this. I work in a large enterprise that has Microsoft Office on its computers. However, I use OpenOffice on my computers due to familiarity, ease of use and functionality. I have never had issues with lack of function, or with lack of compatibility - aside from the time when, suprise suprise, Microsoft decided to invent a new file format and that caused problems... but what's new there?

In addition many of my colleagues use iWork 08 for their work at home. Again we all work in an MS dominated environment, but all of us have absolutely no reduction in productivity due to using alternative office suites.

OpenOffice offers a very full featured, easy to use and intuitive interface which has the big advantage of familiarity over the 'ribbon' offering of MS.

I hope that one day you will look out of the window and see a much brighter day dawning outside!

God Bless

The poor sod who has to scurry around installing compatibilty patches to make office 2003 open 2007 and helping near sighted 50 year old accounts secretaries set their save defaults to msoffice why being asked 'why did you break my computer"

End users are complete cnuts to deal with. For the manager and for support staff.

Smart gimps with local admin rights to want install and use their own office versions should be lined up and shot.

Either there are three people and a cat in your company or your just another opinionated home user who has never met the bored pleb in accounting who hates their wok hates IT staff and hates anything that makes them click in a different place to the day before to get their wok done and leave at 5:30.

What would I know though - I was a developer for two major coporations and have my own business supllying services to five SMEs.

I'd like to see you deal with the real angry rude little toejams that populate real world offices and sulk around the place if you ask them to move their seat five inches and the miserably incompetent management that expect it to be both state of the art and free and could not give a toss about how many young smart people spend their lives crawling around offices at night fixing s**t like open office while clerical staff who are pain more stick likeglue to civilised wok hours and go home on time.

You can stick vista, linux et all up you bottom for all the use they are when faced with rude stupid office staff just lookikng for an excuse to dish out abuse.

Don't forget the marketing cock addict with an IPOD full of viri who just has to be allowed install any old sh*t onto a stable network because he nearly made a web site in 1999.

15 years in IT and I hate it.

Go support 200 end users for a year and tell me all about your whizz bang freeware/microsoft junk.

Office apps have offered nothing new that people need for 10 years. People use excel because of mountains of sheets riddles with SQL odbc reporting, macros etc taht for the average SME would take NASA and their budget to make work in anything else.

I hate you all!

For your sins I hope you wind up supporting your favoured tat.

AMEN!!

To that!!!

AMEN!!

To that!!!

I have never understood why

I have never understood why Microsoft feels compelled to 'reinvent the wheel' with every new version of software. It's not enough simply to improve the software and add functionality. Oh, no. They have to redesign it completely. Suppose every time you bought a new car, you had how to drive all over again. That's what it's like with Microsoft software. It doesn't need to be that way. The basic controls should not be changed solely for the sake of change!
I use Office 2000 now because it works and I understand it. I can use Office 2003 but I don't like it. It's more difficult to use. I have not used Office 2007, but I can imagine what it would be like. Count me out.

The reason is simple...

Constantly changing the base features and UI gives MS a moving target. There are multiple benefits to that. 1) it makes it harder for competitors to figure out where you're going to be, never mind where you are. 2) it allows you to charge for training classes again, and again, and again. (Really, how many times do you have to get certified on an OS or an app? If it didn't change with every release, only once. There's no money in that.) 3) it allows you and your MCSE Certified followers to write tons of new books: "Learn Office 2000!", "Learn Office XP!", "Learn Office 2003!", "Learn Office 2007!"...)

Bottom line: it's the $$$.