Ads by TechWords
Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
Preston Gralla's picture
Preston Gralla

Seeing Through Windows

OpenOffice 3 review: Who needs Microsoft Office?

Rate this
Rated -77
767 Votes

I've just put the beta of OpenOffice 3 through its paces, and found that the office suite can do just about anything that Microsoft Office can do, supports a wide variety of formats...and, of course, is free. Given all that, who needs Microsoft Office?

I reviewed the Windows version of OpenOffice 3. The 147.9 MB download comes with six applications: the Writer word processor, Calc spreadsheet, Impress presentations program, Base database program, Math equation editor, and Draw graphics program. Even at a more than 147 MB download, though, it's still svelte compared to Microsoft Office.

Keep in mind that this is an early beta, and the program isn't expected to be ready until September. It's buggy, so don't use it in a production environment.

For most of what you use an office suite for, you'll find that OpenOffice 3.0 will more than fill your needs. Whether you're creating documents, spreadsheets, or presentations, all the basics, and much more is here. There's excellent formatting tools, mail merge, macros, solid charting tools, and the ability to easily create presentations.

An excellent new addition is the Start Centre, pictured below. It lets you easily create a new document, or open an existing one --- just click the proper icon. The Start Centre only appears if you don't currently have an OpenOffice application opened. Once you've opened an application, you can create or open a document by right-clicking the OpenOffice icon in the system tray, and making the appropriate choice.

OpenOffice 3.0 Start Centre

Particularly useful is that OpenOffice now handles a wide variety of formats, including the upcoming OpenDocument Format (ODF) 1.2 standard, and will also be able to open documents created in Microsoft Office 2007 and Office 2008 for the Mac, which means that it's about as universally useful as an Office suite can be. It can also export files to PDF format. Mac users will be pleased to know that it can run on Mac OSX without having to use X11.

The OpenOffice wizards are especially useful, and walk you through tasks such as creating databases and presentations. Experts won't need them, but everyone else will most likely welcome then. You can see and Impress wizard in action below.

OpenOffice 3.0 Impress

One drawback is the program's stodgy, dull-looking overall interface. It's functional, but not more than that. And it's certainly not nearly as useful as the Microsoft Office 2007 ribbon. The screenshot below shows Writer in action. It's good that it now supports displaying multiple pages on screen. But overall, using this program feels like a trip back to the 1990s.

OpenOffice 3.0 Writer

OpenOffice also doesn't support some of Microsoft Office 2007's higher-end features, such as Quick Parts. And there's very few templates, backgrounds, and layouts. And if you work in an enterprise that's standardized on Microsoft Office, you won't find the program of much use.

But if you can live without a few high-end features that most people don't use, and don't mind not having plenty of templates, you'll find OpenOffice 3 a winner. There's no need to pay top dollar for an office suite, when there's a free one, just waiting to be downloaded.

By the way, I'll have a more complete review running in Computerworld soon.

For more details about the beta, and to download it, click here.

Like this blog? Subscribe to the RSS feed!

What People Are Saying

Rate this
Rated 0
436 Votes

I have never understood why

I have never understood why Microsoft feels compelled to 'reinvent the wheel' with every new version of software. It's not enough simply to improve the software and add functionality. Oh, no. They have to redesign it completely. Suppose every time you bought a new car, you had how to drive all over again. That's what it's like with Microsoft software. It doesn't need to be that way. The basic controls should not be changed solely for the sake of change!
I use Office 2000 now because it works and I understand it. I can use Office 2003 but I don't like it. It's more difficult to use. I have not used Office 2007, but I can imagine what it would be like. Count me out.

Rate this
Rated +7
137 Votes

I agree that the learning

I agree that the learning curve is much steeper with Office 2007. However, this is only true for power users who are transitioning from an older version. As an Access and Excel developer I hate how I can't even do the simplest things (like pivot tables) without resorting to the Help file.

The real difference if for NEW users. The new layout really enables them to learn the program much faster.

Rate this
Rated +34
590 Votes

The ribbon... really?

The best thing about OpenOffice is that it works. Period. Microsoft Office might have worked once, but they have rearranged everything so many times that I can no longer do what I once did. The ribbon is testament to how poorly Microsoft understands their product. It is a tool. Of course I want the tool to be improved. But when a hammer no longer looks like a hammer and I have no idea how to hold it, it no longer matters how much you have improved. I love OpenOffice because it has improved with every release and I still know how to hold it and use. Microsoft's ribbon is garbage. Sure it looks neat, but it now takes me 15 minutes to find the buttons that have been moved to something that once took me 5. The job of software is to allow me to be more productive, do more in less time. Not the other way around. I am done with Microsoft. I will stick with the community that has it principles right.

Rate this
Rated +11
463 Votes

If all you need to do is

If all you need to do is independently and simply do word processing or calculations (and other office-software tasks)then Open office Suite is the way to go. Forget Microsoft and its cost. However, if your company wants to be a Microsoft sweatshop (have everything from the website to CRM to ERP and everything in between be from Microsoft) then Microsoft Office is the way to go. Microsoft products then to nicely (i.e- purposely) integate with other Microsoft products. So it will save the company on IT cost and gives a way to integrate products better. Period. Just because something is free does not mean its right for the context and get the context down before making laws.

Rate this
Rated +31
575 Votes

Car comparison

When someone buys an expensive car will not agree that some other cheap brand car has the same features. Don't you agree?

Rate this
Rated +20
648 Votes

A trip back

I had to laugh when Mr. MS tried to denigrate OO as a trip back to the 90's.

Ah, the 90's. I remember them well. That was the last time MS Office actually did what I wanted without 5 bazillion feature options that change locations with every release.

That's probably why I love OO. I don't need the rocket science function bloat that is MS Office.

Rate this
Rated +56
720 Votes

Preston, you ARE the M.S. Guy...

YOU need MS Office. Otherwise where will your job go? M.S. won't hire you, I assure you! (Unless they need a whipping boi!)

Rate this
Rated -11
591 Votes

Let Gralla microshill

He's dreaming of standing by Steve Ballmer some day.

Rate this
Rated +8
616 Votes

This was better though

Have to admit, Preston was lighter at bashing non-MS in this one. Maybe someday, he'll actually expand from his ignorance.

Rate this
Rated -7
457 Votes

ribbon?? rubbish!!

ribbon?? rubbish!!