Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 

Palm Pre's processor beats Apple iPhone's

While there are hundreds of hardware and then software layers on top of the processor, not much else can make as big an input on the overall abilities of a device than the horsepower it has under the hood.  In this race, Palm Pre's engine beats the (current!) iPhone and just about any other smartphone out there hands down.

That doesn't mean that by the time mid 2009 rolls around, the iPhone won't have a better engine, but we won't know until the second Apple is ready to tell us.

The current iPhone has an ARM 11-based architecture from Samsung (S3C6400).  While a popular chip with many advantages, it isn't state of the art - it might have been when iPhone was announced 2 years ago but now it is very "middle of the road".  And for battery draw (and heat?) reasons, Apple doesn't even crank it all of the way up.  It currently doesn't even reach 500MHz (out of a possible 667MHz).

As I stated last month, most new high-end multimedia phones will be coming with ARM Cortex A8-based microprocessors which offer roughly double the speed at, again roughly,  the same battery draw as the ARM 11 series processors.  These processors are even climbing up into netbook territory.

Palm's Pre is the first such phone to have a ARM Cortex processor.  By most accounts it is the TI OMAP 34x0 series.

I have to believe that Apple, when they do their yearly iPhone update in June/July (not just flash storage upgrade in the next month) will be able to match this processor with either their own PA Semi-based ARM Cortex processor or a Cortex processor from another vendor (but probably not quad-core).

To get an idea of what these processors are capable of, they have been rated at about the same speed at Intel's Atom processor per clock cycle.

From the TI OMAP 3440 Specs page:

  • The OMAP™ 3 architecture combines mobile entertainment with high performance productivity applications
  • Advanced Superscalar ARM® Cortex™-A8 RISC core enabling 3x gain in performance
  • Designed in 65-nm CMOS process technology adds processing performance
  • IVA™ 2+ (Image Video Audio) accelerator enables multi-standard (MPEG4, WMV9, RealVideo, H263, H264) encode/decode at D1 (720x480 pixels) 30 fps
  • Integrated image signal processor (ISP) for faster, higher-quality image capture and lower system cost
  • Flexible system support
    • Composite and S-video TV output
    • XGA (1024x768 pixels), 16M-color (24-bit definition) display support
    • Flatlink™ 3G-compliant serial display and parallel display support
    • High Speed USB2.0 On-The-Go support
  • Seamless connectivity to Hard Disk Drive (HDD) devices for mass storage
  • Leverages SmartReflex™ technologies for advanced power reduction
  • M-shield™ mobile security enhanced with ARM TrustZone™ support
  • Software-compatible with OMAP™ 2 processors
  • HLOS support for customizable interface
  • Support for OpenGL ES 1.1

 

More on the Palm Pre from the IT BlogWatch.

What People Are Saying

But seriously...

I own a mac and I love the way the iPhone looks. Apple seems to really spend time making their stuff very pleasing to the eye.

But really... the iPhone is a jack of all trades and a master of none. It's probably the biggest innovation in mobile communications but what it makes up for in design and implementation, it lacks in basic functions.

It's a great "phone" but it definitely isn't the best one out there. Not saying it's going to stay that way though. Change is constant and stuff just keep getting better every day.

It's easy to put a faster

It's easy to put a faster processor in a cellphone, but not so easy to get a battery that can keep the phone powered up for a reasonable length of time. Battery technology is not keeping up with processor power. Chances are if you want more life from the battery then you'd better put a thicker one inside the case. Apple keeps trying to make their devices thinner and thinner and they are going to be the losers when it comes to practicality. Plus, people want the iPhone and iPod Touch to be some super-gaming machines which is ridiculous for such dainty devices. People want to play some sophisticated 3D games that sucks the battery dry in a couple of hours and then they get angry. They are so stupid. The iPhone is just a glorified cellphone at best and the Touch is even thinner than the iPhone which is also foolish. That's Apple's curse of form over function. Keep the iPhone thin but give gamers and video watchers a bigger battery for the iPod Touch, for chrissake.
The Pre is a brand-new prototype and not even in production, so we'll see how long the battery holds it's charge in the real world.

Is there a point in this

Is there a point in this type of comparison? The Pre isn't a shipping product. It could have 16 ARM-A8 CPUs in it. That doesn't make a bit of difference to me, you or anyone else if you can't currently buy and use the damned thing.

While I agree it's great to get excited about potential products that use the newest technology, it's a waste of time to compare it to products on the market when it isn't even due to be released for half a year yet!? Especially during a time when a lot of people are expecting Apple to release a third generation iPhone along with another major update to the iPhone OS.

WTF

Are you serious? Apple did not release much for their upcoming product launches for 2009 buddy, maybe you need to re-watch the Keynote. I bet you got all excited over the specs of the iPhone and didn't doubt it like you are the Pre. Stop being a fanboy and don't bother posting if you're going to bring your negative fanboy posts into here. And who cares with the new iPhone, what have they done that wasn't already available on the 2G iPhone? What's next, replace the Glass screen with plastic? Face it, the iPhone 3G are the same exact damn phone, just one has plastic and the other has metal. You think they're going to make drastic changes? Uh, Not.. I understand you get and got hurt that another phone has more power than the iPhone, Well get used to it because your iPhone isn't the best product out, even if you do have one.

Are you serious? Get off

Are you serious? Get off your high horse and get a grip on reality. If you think the iPhone 2G is the "same exact damn phone" as the 3G you really are ignorant, stupid or both.

Kings button

Did you notice the all new iPhone 3g Kings Button. It seems to steal the world of the really rich. Take a look at the piece of work with iPhone

http://www.kanbal.com/index.php?/Electronics/iphone-3g-kings-button-costliest-on-earth.html

There's more...

There's more about the Pre and webOS in Friday's IT Blogwatch: Palm previews the Pre and webOS.

Hey, iPhone is 2 years old ...

So, it is the bare minimum for competitors to offer at least equivalent or better hardware.

And the the Palm is coming

And the the Palm is coming out after the iPhone. Its not that fair to compare. Isnt it funny how everyone wants to copy the iPhone?

When Palm had pda's and

When Palm had pda's and touch screen and smart phones apple had only
anorexic designs. Iphone is the Ninendo Wii of the phones. Lots of hipe and cool, not so much hardware and real power.