Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Picasa 3: Great Linux photo software

I have a confession to make. There's no software on earth I can't make dance and sing ... except for photography programs. Whether it's Adobe Photoshop CS4 on a Mac or GIMP 2.6.3 on Linux, I'm a klutz. So, when I need to make my holiday photos look halfway decent, I try my best with easy to use photo programs like Photoshop Elements 7 or Google Picasa. While I'd like to see more Adobe programs on Linux, with Google's new release of Picasa 3 for Linux now here, I'm in no hurry to see Photoshop Elements on Linux.

Don't get me wrong, Picasa doesn't have all of Elements' features. After all, these days Elements is really just the low-end version of Photoshop rather than a program for casual photographers like yours truly. For me, and for the millions of others who find getting rid of red-eye in photos the biggest challenge they'll ever tackle, Picasa is more than enough program.

I installed the new Picasa, which like all Google programs is a free download and labeled as beta software on two systems. The first is my new main Linux desktop system. This is a Dell Inspiron 530s, powered by a 2.2GHz Intel Pentium E2200 dual-core processor with an 800MHz front side bus, 4GB of RAM, a 500GB SATA drive, and an integrated Intel 3100 GMA (Graphics Media Accelerator) running the Debian-based SimplyMEPIS 8. My other test computer is my openSUSE 11 powered ThinkPad R61 with a 2.2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor T7500, 2GBs of RAM, an 80GB hard drive and an integrated Intel 965 GMA.

Underneath the hood, Picasa isn't a native Linux application. It's actually a Windows program running under Wine, an open-source version of the Windows API (application programming interface). No matter, on both computers, the program ran flawlessly. And, better still, it did a flawless job of making my photos presentable.

Picasa includes all the tools you'd expect from an easy-to-use photo editing program. These include cropping, red-eye editing, straighten images, and so on. It also makes all these functions easy to use, including the somewhat fancier ones such as adding tints or turning a color image into black and white or sepia.

It also has features that are somewhat unusual in photo programs. For example, rather than moving your photos to another, self-selected directory it keeps the images in the directory you choose. I can't count the number of times I've had to track down photos from where Adobe has decided to hide them or ended up creating duplicate images. With Picasa, that's not an issue.

Another nice feature, as far as I'm concerned anyway, is that while Picasa saves your edits, it actually doesn't change the original image until you decide to print or export the photo. This way, no matter how ham-handed you are at photo editing, you have ample opportunities to go back and start again until you finally get it right.

Picasa 3 has also added multi-word and geo-tagging. As you'd expect from a Google program, you can use geo-tagging with Google Earth, which is also available on Linux.

The program also gives a great selection of ways to get your photos to friends and family. This includes slideshows, creating a photo collage, creating a gift CD, and uploading the shots of your favorite kids on Christmas morning to your free Google Picasa Web Album.

This really is a great program. Frankly, I would have paid good money for it. Picasa is simply the best, easy-to-use, simple photo editing program around. The fact that this free program runs on Linux is just the cherry on top of the sundae.

What People Are Saying

digiKam

I would give a one vote for digiKam as well. I even installed it for Windows to replace picasa but because it is still on beta and crash sometimes in situations where it does not on Linux OS, I do not use it than just testing.

I used Picasa on Windows and suggested that for normal persons who do not need any fancy stuff from Elements. And I mean the HC photoediting stuff (where GIMP is more than enough now with 32bit support) why the picasa is not enough. When digikam hits stable on Windows, I will be suggesting it for those who takes photos more from others subjects than just from family.

Picasa got a Geotaggin? Well, digiKam supports that too and allows you even search them by using a map.
IPTC, XMP and DNG support makes digiKam more than great software for those who knows what kind possibilities digital media actually have. And when you have batch red eye remover, great printing wizard for old fashion way and easy-to-use Showfoto editor... there is not much what could be needed.

Amarok2 for music
digiKam for photos
....... for videos?

Just list for Linux OS about photo editing what is available and usable.

1. digiKam
2. Picasa
3. F-spot
4. Kphotoalbum

How about to upload photos

How about to upload photos to Google web album with digiKam :D

PS: Don't get me wrong I'm using digiKam too.

well, should be mentioned

well, should be mentioned that Picasa Web Albums, Flickr!, custom web albums etc are supported. digiKam is developing Kipi-plugins too so all kind applications what are made to use KDE technologies can get such possiblities via kipi-plugins. I use my own web archive on FTP server and I transferr everything as Flash album straight from digiKam.

Thats why I like the digiKam when it really allows to use what services is user using.

If someone is buying

If someone is buying Photoshop to do things Picasa is capable of, they are an idiot who deserves to be relieved of the exorbitant amounts of money such software will cost them. I don't care what platform you're on, if you just want to crop/resize/tweak/organize your family photos, there are no end of the number of free, high-quality programs available. Sadly, I know a number of people who think you *must* have photoshop for such things. Marketing is a wonderful thing, isn't it?

As for Linux, I get so tired of people whose anti-linux shtick is that Gimp sucks compared to Photoshop. Steven, you're a KDE user; howabout talking about Krita or Gwenview or Showfoto, or any of the other numerous excellent native Linux programs that fit the bill here? Why do we perpetuate the idea that the only way to edit photos in Linux either involves Gimp or running something in Wine?

numerous excellent native Linux programs

Alan,
You said "howabout talking about Krita or Gwenview or Showfoto, or any of the other numerous excellent native Linux programs that fit the bill here?"
I'm after a basic photo editing program as outlined in the main article but not Picasa; the programs you name are just organizers (not editors). Can you please name the "numerous excellent native Linux programs" please?
I'm a Gnome user so don't fancy Digikam (it needs to load 40 dependents which are mainly KDE packages) and I have tried F-Spot but have an issue with the edit controls. I don't seem to be able to find anything else other than Gimp.
Many Thanks

These days, only RAW support counts

'nough said.

I shelled out $89 or thereabouts for bibblelite. Now that's a native program that rocks.

I kind of feel that if I pay 5000 bucks for a camera, I should at least treat my captures using a decent program.

I tried Digikam, but boy is that application slow.

Obviously, this point is moot for people who shoot jpg only.

You could've saved yourself $89

I shoot RAW, and I use Gimp with the UFRaw plugin (also available as a standalone application, in case you'd rather use Krita or any other photo editing tool).

I'll have to second the

I'll have to second the Digikam recommendation with the Kipi plugins. It like Amarok were the exciting moments I realized that I always want to have a Linux machine b/c these two apps (among others later) do the best job of any software I have used on any OS.

One key rotation, red eye fixes, all the basic stuff is easy. Advanced stuff can be done or the user can switch to GIMP.

Exciting times we live in. Thank you to the open-source community.

Check out Digikam

Do you know Digikam? I find it a nicer tool for working with photos. And it is a completely native Linux application and also completely free and open source. If you haven't already it is worth taking a look at.

I don't give a rats how well Picassa compares to Abobe

Neither of them are native Linux applications, and both of them require WINE to function.

DigiKam is a far better choice for Linux, as it's both Free and Open. For Image editing that requires more than DigiKam, which will do all the common tasks, learn how to use the GIMP (it also is a native Linux application, that doesn't require WINE to make it function)

When Google release a genuine Linux, Free and Open Source, version of Picassa, then, and only then will I bother with it.