Ads by TechWords
Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
Mark Hall's picture
Mark Hall

On the Mark

Planning with uncertainty

 Palm Desert, Calif.--Project planning software has proved itself to be a useful, but not particularly precise tool in predicting when a project will actually come to fruition. That may change with the beta release of LiquidPlanner announced here this week at the DEMO '08 conference. According to Jason Carlson, vice president of engineering at LiquidPlanner Inc. in Bellevue, Wash., his software embraces what other project planning programs eschew: uncertainty. Each task owner in a project gives a range of time when a task will be completed, from best to worst case. Carlson claims that the linear regression math in the software can then calculate a true delivery date with 98% probability. That's way better than anything else on the market, says CEO Charles Seybold. He adds that when a project manager sees each task owner's range of uncertainty to complete their work and the cascading effect it has on a project, he or she can see where and when to distribute resources to keep the project on track. The hosted service captures all of your projects' histories so you are able to review how well similar projects or project teams performed in the past. The beta is free now. Ironically, neither gentleman would predict when the LiquidPlanner project would be completed.

What People Are Saying

Rate this
Rated -9
185 Votes

The LiquidPlanner product is

The LiquidPlanner product is very interesting. I'm planning to sign up for a demo and do a test of the software pretty soon. I want to see how much they have improved upon the early concepts espoused by the stochastic project management theories of the 1980-90's. Also, a product built around ranges should be easier to use than something like @Risk within Primavera (and other products). In the end, Eli Goldratt should be proud that someone decided to build a software based ont he theory he espoused in "Critical Chain". Good luck to the team at LuquidPlanner.