Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
For more info on a specific newsletter, click the title. Details will be displayed in a new window.
Computerworld Daily News (First Look and Wrap-Up)
Computerworld Blogs Newsletter
The Weekly Top 10
More E-Mail Newsletters 
Mark Hall's picture
Mark Hall

On the Mark

Power management yields green

Look inside a data center and you see servers, switches, routers and sundry other digital gear sucking up a lot of electricity. True. But according to power engineers at Cleveland-based Eaton Corp., all that hardware is only consuming less than a third of your data center's electricity demand. The rest is evenly gobbled up between your HVAC systems and your power management systems.

So, while it is vital that your money-saving green initiatives in the data center continue to focus on more efficient computer and network systems, it is equally important to review the energy efficiencies of the rest of your data center technologies.

One place to start is with your uninterruptible power supply (UPS), says Pedro Robredo, product line manager for Eaton's Power Quality division. He says the company's UPS 9395 825 kVA's transformerless technology is more efficient than UPS with transformers, which squander away kilowatts and take up lots more data center real estate.

Eaton's Fred Miller, product line manager, says combining the UPS 9395 825 and its power distribution unit (a PDU handles power loads for each rack of servers) can get you to 98.5% power efficiency. (As a comparison, electricity flowing across utility grid gets only about 20% efficiency, Miller notes.) He says as server virtualization projects move apace, putting greater demand on each server in a rack, "power per rack is going through the roof" with as much as four-times the power consumption of pre-virtualized racks.

Pricing for the UPS 9395 825 kVA, which begins volume shpments later this month, is implementation specific.

What People Are Saying

virtualization projects

This article was a good read for me until the last paragraph which Id like to ask you to detail out more. My colleague and I just took a 4U and 2U and condensed them both into the the 4U on a Red Hat system running VMWare. We have this behind our Raritan Power Monitor and have easily seen a substantial reduction in power usage.

Now perhaps when you say "greater demand on each server in a rack " you are referring to processor tasks and memory stream capacity running at 90% now and not 9 Servers running at 10% in a pre-virtual "bare metal" rack setup. So maybe I misunderstand the last VM comments... Could you clarify yor thoughts on VM and green power consumption in another article ?

In my experiences so far in my ITS green initiatives, when it comes to virtualization being a greater demand on power consumption I have to disagree. On overall disk power, we are getting down to a lean mean electricity/utility wattage (this is what it all comes down to cause that is what is billed on) fighting weight thx to RH and VM!