Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


Red Hat returns to the Linux desktop

Red Hat used to be in the desktop business along with all the other Linux distributors. Then, they left. As Jim Whitehurst, Red Hat's CEO, explained Red Hat's desktop approach to me last year, "There are companies that sell hundreds of products for millions of dollars and there are companies that sell millions of products for hundreds of dollars. Guess which kind of company Red Hat is?"

Now, however, Red Hat is switching from Xen to KVM for virtualization. As part of that switchover, Red Hat will be using not only KVM, but the SolidICE/SPICE (Simple Protocol for Independent Computing Environments) desktop virtualization and management software suite to introduce a new server-based desktop virtualization system.

Does this mean that Red Hat will be getting back into the Linux desktop business? That's the question I posed to Red Hat CTO Brian Stevens, in a phone call after the Red Hat/KVM press conference, and he told me that, "Yes. Red Hat will indeed be pushing the Linux desktop again."

What got Red Hat interested in the desktop again was that SolidICE/SPICE and the "virtual desktop management suite desktop made the desktop much more interesting." And, Stevens continued, it's not just good for the Linux desktop. "This open-source software can solve management problems for both Windows and Linux desktops. So, while it absolutely makes sense for us to deliver a Red Hat desktop on a virtualized platform, we can also put Windows and Linux desktops side by side. With Red Hat's virtualization, users will no longer have a choice of one or the other, they can have both."

Specifically, the new virtual Red Hat Desktop will be managed by Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager for Desktops. This virtual desktops management system, Red Hat claims, will deliver three to five times better cost-performance for both Linux and Windows desktops.

The desktops themselves, both Windows and Linux, will run on Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor. By using SolidICE and SPICE remote rendering technology, this will not be yet another thin-client approach. This will be a full-powered desktop that can handle HD video and video-conferencing. On a high-speed network with sufficiently muscular servers, Red Hat expects both Windows and Linux desktop users to have a full desktop experience without performance or feature compromises.

This follows up with Red Hat's existing Linux desktop efforts. It's not that Red Hat ever gave up on doing things with the desktop. It's just that Red Hat had no plans on making any money from the desktop with a formal desktop product.

Instead, Red Hat kept working on Linux desktop improvements, like improving Linux's audio playback with PulseAudio and making software installation and management easier with PackageKit. You just wouldn't find these improvements in a Red Hat Personal Desktop. Instead, you'd find them in Fedora 10, Red Hat's community Linux.

Things are changing. Now that Red Hat has a way to fit the Linux desktop into its corporate business plans, the formal Red Hat Linux desktop is on its way back. You can expect to see it in the late summer of 2009 soon after RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) 5.4 appears.

What People Are Saying

("Yes. Red Hat will indeed

("Yes. Red Hat will indeed be pushing the Linux desktop again.")Indeed, once again its back. Glad to hear this,your information is good.

so if i understand, red hat

so if i understand, red hat runs alongside your windows or your linux and makes it work better? or is it its own separate os??

wedding planning

Red Hat returns to the Linux desktop...

Ubuntu is so far in the lead that Red Hat will never catch up! Red Hat should nary have blinked, eh?

both distributions can

both distributions can 'borrow' eachother technology. it doesn't matter that ubuntu is ahead, all their tools are open source and redhat can take them and use them (if they are interested), other way around works too, ubuntu can take whatever they want and use it.

that is they way open source works, that is what makes all the distros great. they work idenpendently together.

Ubuntu isn't that far. Most

Ubuntu isn't that far. Most of the technology it uses isn't their own and a fair part is of Redhat (NetworkManager, libvirt, a fair part of the newer kernel features.)
So the most critical resource isn't technology. It's users.
Ubuntu gained most of their users by including proprietary software and having an aspect of "non-profit" and "human" in some sense.
Anyway it always has been a commercial entity looking at market share and profit like Red Hat except that their contributions to the Free Software community has been minor.

Fedora is mercedes, Ubuntu is BMW

I use both Fedora and Ubuntu, and they are both great. Its just a matter of preference BMW or Mercedes, Angelina Jolie or Megan Fox etc.. something like that.

And if Redhat just use Fedora 10 or 11 as the basis of their Enterprise desktop (RHEL 6), they can change the hegemony of the game against Windows or Ubuntu for that matter. Fedora is just a great Linux both for Server and Desktop (been using Fedora exclusively since Fedora 7). RHEL 5 is based on Fedora 6 and starts to show its age now.. (vs Ubuntu) but with Desktop virtualization strategy using KVM and RHED offerings, we might be for some interesting times ahead.

I believe Redhat will go seriously into desktop.. but for Professional Enterprise Desktop space rather than consumer. For others there's Fedora

Ubuntu or Fedora are desktop-wise ? try Mandriva first ...

The only long-term distribution providing an excellent ratio between innovation and stability is Mandriva, you are not locked to kde, gnome, lxde, xfce, or else, you have them all, including a lot of developpment and server packages.

If you think about desktop as for the normal user, but also as a power user or a workstation, then fedora can fit, but you'll get a lot more with Mandriva Linux, with releases more regular, and a great community (aside the commercial branch).

Fedora wants to virtualize the desktop, why not, this is already what is been done by other companies and operating systems. What is in the desktop is important, and Mandriva is the clear cut winner...

> You are not locked to kde,

> You are not locked to kde, gnome, lxde, xfce, or else, you have them all, including a lot of developpment and server packages.

The same applies to Fedora, and probably to Ubuntu as well (don't know it).

to name a few: * ubuntu :

to name a few:
* ubuntu : gnome
* kubuntu: kde
* xubuntu : xfce
* lubuntu : lxde (soon)

Red Hat Linux back on the desktop?

I'll believe it when I see it. I remember them talking about this Red Hat Global Desktop sometime back and I don't think anything ever came of it really. I think Canonical has got it right (and the mindshare) with Linux on the desktop with their Ubuntu efforts.

I use to be a BIG fan of Red Hat, but when they pulled the plug on the desktop effort, I went elsewhere (not to look back).