Industry


Ads by TechWords

See your link here


The RIAA gives up on finding a competitor to iTunes

The RIAA today announced it is giving up on suing individual users for distributing music over the Internet.  Although they still will serve notice to ISPs which have customers who are big offenders, they have effectively stopped trying to put up walls around music.

More news will be coming up in the next few weeks, perhaps at Macworld:  Apple is finalizing the deal which will see all record labels distributing their music on iTunes (which owns over 70% of the US and a majority of the global market in digitally distributed music) DRM-free.  There have been many hints that this is coming and a few false starts.  Interestingly, Steve Jobs won't be there to present it at Macworld, which makes me think the announcement won't happen at the event, but at some time after.

RIAA iTeuns DRM Apple had foreseen this and even posted a "Thoughts on Music" letter to the industry stating that DRM-free was the best policy for consumers.  Two years later, the rest of the industry is realizing that they can't create another reality in which they control the flow of information.

In any case, the bigger story is that the record companies are basically giving up on finding a competitor to iTunes in the music space.  They had originally looked to Amazon to be the major US competitor to Apple.  They gave Amazon DRM-free MP3s at discounted prices so that Amazon could gain marketshare against Apple.  Only the smallest of the big four, EMI, had provided Apple with DRM-free music, and originally, that was at a higher price.

Although many (myself included) think that DRM-free high quality MP3s you get from Amazon at often discounted prices are better than the product Apple offers through iTunes, they've only managed to capture about 10-15 percent of the market, depending on who you ask.  Amazon isn't going to be a realistic competitor to iTunes anytime soon.

iTunes's complete ecosystem, exciting delivery, better branding and superior community are likely the reasons that Apple is keeping ahead of the competition.  It doesn't hurt that part of their ecosystem, the iPod, is far and away the most popular portable music player in the world.  AppleTV is a convenient way to put music on home theater systems as well.

So, even with this open ecosystem and more competitive pricing by Amazon and others in the DRM-free space, will Apple be able to keep its huge lead on the industry?  The numbers seem to state that it will.

What People Are Saying

internet radio is it

my girlfriend asked me the other day why i keep buying music off itunes that i hear on groove salad (somafm.com) , since i listen for 16 hours a day to internet radio

"you buy what you like but then you only ever listen to internet radio!"

its like im hoarding for the day world war three comes and we have to hide in bunkers... i have no real need for the music i buy except when im flying/traveling.

internet radio is so good and so accessible (through itunes no less) that i have to say i agree less and less people will buy music to keep and save.

mg

Great choice in online

Great choice in online radio!!! My Fav.

Is MP3 really superior?

Hi Seth:

You say "many (myself included) think that DRM-free high quality MP3s you get from Amazon at often discounted prices are better than the product Apple offers through iTunes"

I thought an MP3 was a lesser quality recording than the format iTunes uses, which I believe is AAC?

Can you explain?

--Rob

Hi

Hi Rob,
http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=200154210&#spec
* Bit Rate: Where possible, we encode our MP3 files using variable bit rates for maximum audio quality and smaller file sizes, aiming at an average of 256 kilobits per second (kbps). Using a variable bit rate allows us to allocate a higher bit rate to the more complex sections of music files while using a smaller bit rate for the less complex sections. The average of these rates is then calculated to produce an average bit rate for the entire file that represents the overall sound quality. Some of our content is encoded using a constant bit rate of 256 kbps. This content will have the same excellent audio quality at a slightly larger file size.

Amazon uses variable bitrate while iTunes uses 256Kbs AAC for iTunes Plus.

For the most part, these two file formats are indistinguishable

Not Really...

256kbps vbr mp3's aren't as good as 256kbps AAC. With vbr files, you set the max kbps you want complex stuff to be encoded in. So the max is 256kbps. The majority of the song will be less than that. The benefit to vbr is file size, not quality. AAC is the newer standard and "supposedly" better than MP3, but even if they're the same, the vbr mp3 has to be worse just because of the way vbr mp3's are compressed (technically, you may not hear a difference).

Finnally!

Finally the nimrods are going to allow Apple to sell DRM free content? I'll believe it when I see it.

'Although many (myself

'Although many (myself included) think that DRM-free high quality MP3s you get from Amazon at often discounted prices are better than the product Apple offers through iTunes...'

Just why would you think that or anybody else for that matter - the AAC files are actually better quality than the mp3 files and joe public seems to agree?

@macerroneous... internet radio better than owning your own music????

You wish!

MP3 is the old (if not

MP3 is the old (if not ancient) MPEG-1 audio format whereas AAC is the modern MPEG-4 audio format that is vastly superior to MP3. AAC is also standardised by both the IEC and ISO.

Why anybody would want to use MP3 these days is beyond me.

What's Next?

It sounds like this war is over. However, I think the number of songs people actually "collect" for their own usage (either legally or illegally) will start to decline. I base this on personal experience and am extrapolating to the universe, in general. Nonetheless, now that the internet radio options for iphone (and touch) are fleshing out, I find myself spending less and less time listening to my own music. I think this transformation (access to virtually any audio source in the world over your cell phone) is truly miraculous. I believe it was Ballmer (or some other Zune supporter) who was quoted on this subject a while back. So, while people will still buy MP3 players in 2 years, they won't buy many without access to internet radio.

Perhaps the RIAA salvos being fired at Pandora and other legitimate internet sources show where the new battle is being waged.

I DIsagree

I m not sure how many people under the age of 30 use internet radio . . . most younger people, the majority of music buyers, buy singles or download them. Not use Pandora, but itunes maybe some people use Songza. Although with that said, my mother-in law loves Pandora, and all the librarians she works with. what people really want it to be able to always download a song, not repay for it when you delete it off your harddrive